LambdaTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

LambdaTest and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2. LambdaTest holds a 4.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 28 LambdaTest reviews

2,889 Views
2,485 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

1,602 Views
753 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 27, 2025

Visual Studio Test Professional and LambdaTest are prominent players in the software testing category. Visual Studio Test Professional seems to have the upper hand in terms of comprehensive features, while LambdaTest is favored for specific testing needs.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional is known for its rich IDE and seamless integration with Microsoft tools. It provides extensive code analysis and detailed reporting for robust development. LambdaTest offers a scalable browser testing platform with real-time testing across devices and efficient geolocation testing. Its automation capabilities and CI/CD tool integrations are also notable.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could improve its documentation, enhance tool integration, and address its pricing model. Interface stability is another area of concern. LambdaTest users seek improved mobile app testing, expanded device options, and enhanced dashboard analytics. Better performance in native application testing could further improve user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional supports on-premises deployment with strong customer support and proactive technical assistance. LambdaTest excels in cloud deployment, offering a user-friendly experience and responsive support, making cloud transitions smooth for users.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is seen as pricey due to its structured annual licensing fee but offers significant ROI from streamlined workflows. LambdaTest provides cost-effective pricing with flexible subscription plans, offering extensive testing features without significant initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (8th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 4.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LambdaTest	4.5%
Visual Studio Test Professional	1.4%
Other	94.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Karine Kirche

Practice Specialist at a government with 1-10 employees

Cloud-based testing has simplified remote mobile validation and provides flexible device coverage

I was not impressed with how detailed their analytics and logs are from LambdaTest. The solution we were testing is being used because many of us are working from home. It was easy to implement because with a real phone, we have to bring a real phone to each person. Since three years ago, many employees have been working from home, so we were trying to find a solution for this challenge. We had no need to exploit the information for the analytics generated in the background. The purpose was simply to make it easy for our employees to access a phone. The downsides I noticed include that the pricing was very good, but the visual quality of the image sometimes suffers. The contrast on a real iPhone provides better contrast than with the cloud solution. The only aspect that was less favorable than on a real phone was the contrast of the color.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."

"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."

More LambdaTest pros

"The integration of Visual Studio with Azure DevOps has improved team collaboration significantly."

"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."

"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."

"It's great for the development of .NET."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."

"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."

"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."

"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."

More LambdaTest cons

"The data flow can be improved."

"The performance could be faster."

"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."

"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."

"The price could be improved."

"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."

"The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface."

"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"I used the product for free."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"It is a price-effective solution"

"I think that the pricing is quite good."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."

"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Performing Arts

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

See all answers

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 42% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 14% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

QA Wolf vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

January 2026

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Overview

LambdaTest offers real-time and automated testing across extensive browser and OS combinations with integrations like Jenkins and GitLab. It combines legacy and real device access for diverse compatibility, enhancing functionality and execution speed with HyperExecute and Docker tunneling.

Geared for businesses requiring robust browser compatibility, LambdaTest simplifies large-scale testing needs with seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. Its automation features and parallel testing capabilities help detect UI misalignments quickly while reducing manual efforts. LambdaTest supports cross-browser functionality with comprehensive documentation and platform fusions like AWS for enhanced utility.

What key features make LambdaTest indispensable?

Intuitive Interface: Streamlines user experience.
Real-Time Testing: Thousands of browser and OS combinations available.
Tool Integration: Compatible with Jenkins and GitLab.
Automation and Parallel Testing: Efficient test cycles and process streamlining.
Legacy and Real Device Access: Ensures broad compatibility.
HyperExecute: Boosts execution speed significantly.
Docker Tunnel: Enables local testing with ease.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Comprehensive Documentation: Ensures ease of use and knowledge sharing.
Enhanced Performance: Fusions with platforms like AWS offer improved efficiency.
Global User Compatibility: Reduces manual testing, boosts customer experience.
CI/CD Integration: Consistent performance across teams.
Efficient Resource Utilization: Lowered manual testing efforts and cost efficiency.

In industries demanding high browser compatibility and web responsiveness, teams integrate LambdaTest for automation, real-time testing, and maintaining global user experience standards. Its use in parallel testing cycles alongside industry-driven integrations minimizes timelines and optimizes workflows effectively.

LambdaTest

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

February 2026

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.