LinkRunner vs OneTouch AT Network Assistant comparison

LinkRunner and OneTouch AT Network Assistant are both solutions in the Network Troubleshooting category. LinkRunner is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while OneTouch AT Network Assistant is ranked #12. LinkRunner holds a 19.6% mindshare in NT, compared to OneTouch AT Network Assistant’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of LinkRunner users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OneTouch AT Network Assistant users who would recommend it.

LinkRunner

Read 20 LinkRunner reviews

2,466 Views
707 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Read 6 OneTouch AT Network Assistant reviews

181 Views
84 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LinkRunner

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

OneTouch AT Network Assistant and LinkRunner are two competing network diagnostic tools. LinkRunner appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features, despite its higher cost.

Features:OneTouch AT Network Assistant is recognized for its comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, real-time troubleshooting, and budget-friendly nature. LinkRunner is known for its detailed network visibility, integration with other diagnostic tools, and bonus advanced features.

Room for Improvement:OneTouch AT Network Assistant could improve speed, add more advanced diagnostic tools, and offer better real-time responsiveness. LinkRunner needs better battery life, more intuitive data interpretation features, and refinement in firmware updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OneTouch AT Network Assistant is easy to deploy and has responsive customer service. LinkRunner is also easy to deploy but lacks the same level of customer support, while compensating with robust features.

Pricing and ROI:OneTouch AT Network Assistant is more budget-friendly, providing a satisfactory ROI with fewer features. LinkRunner has a higher initial setup cost but users find the ROI justified by its advanced functionalities and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LinkRunner

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of LinkRunner is 19.6%, down from 23.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneTouch AT Network Assistant is 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Troubleshooting

Featured Reviews

Jesse_B

Manager of networks and infrastructure at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Impressive ease of use, gives comprehensive results in seconds, and saves a lot of time and resources

I've found the VLAN test feature to be most valuable. That's because not many devices do VLAN tests. Normally, I have to send a center technician to check a line and see if it's alive. If it's working, then I have to send a network technician out to log into a switch and see which port it's on and on which VLAN that port is. That's two persons and two separate visits. This device does all of this in a matter of seconds, and that has saved me a lot of time, troubleshooting, and resources. Its ease of use is very impressive. LinkRunner allows me to have my technicians run tests that are normally too complex and require a network specialist. AutoTest works with just one click. AutoTest does a lot of testing that would normally require a network specialist to log in to a switch and check out VLAN based on a port. My technicians don't have to log in to the switch anymore. They can just do AutoTest and information is provided online. So, I no longer have to send a specialist. I can have my technician run these very complex tests. It saves me on resources, time, and site visits. When it comes to troubleshooting, based on my experience, it has given very useful and very helpful information, especially for my field technicians. It has reduced my visits and the amount of presence because it gives a very comprehensive report on your network tests. It tests multiple variables and multiple parameters and gives a very informative report that makes it easy to pinpoint what is the root cause. There are many tools in this one solution. It's basically a bunch of toolkits or tool sets in one device, which makes it very powerful testing equipment.

Read full review

JamesStout

IT Director at JVS Consulting

It's a simple entry-level tool that's easy to set up, but it has some limitations on speed and IP targets

OneTouch is an entry-level testing tool that's coming to the end of its life, I believe, so it has limitations. For example, it can only test up to 1 gig of network speed. It would be helpful if they increased that to 10 gigs. It is also limited in the number of IP targets you can test. If you want to test how many hops or different sites, you should be able to hit a test button and say, "Right then, test these 20 IP addresses to see if I can reach them." It only does up to 10. Most of NetAlly's other devices, like the G2, can do unlimited addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that LinkRunner is an all-in-one device with a touchscreen interface. You don't have to pair it with a phone or anything else to get the full functionality. The built-in tests are one of the most significant advantages. It will pull an IP, ping the gateway, ping out to the intra, and report everything on the screen. It will tell you when a test completes or fails and why."

"In terms of network validation, and copper and fiber Ethernet configuration, I can't imagine life without LinkRunner devices. The minute I got the 10G, everybody was fighting over it. They had never used such a device before and it was just breathtaking for them to very quickly see the validation you can gain from these devices."

"LinkRunner 10G is very handy for onsite troubleshooting and implementations. We can quickly identify the links in terms of 1G, 2.5G, 5G, and 10G on the copper side, and also from 1G up to 10G on the fiber side. It is very handy for me because we deal with a lot of banks. Especially for the provisioning of new services, we use this tool to identify the link capacity and do the necessary testing to ensure all the circuits are ready before the handover to the next team to operate the technology. This is something that saves a lot of time as compared to the old days."

"The AutoTest feature makes it easy for you on both ends. It's an excellent feature, especially if you're by yourself. You plug one end in and you hit AutoTest. It sits and waits for you to plug in the other end and it starts testing."

"The auto-test feature is vital and does 90 percent of what I need on its own. It's fast and I can get there in just a few clicks. It does a good job and tells me everything I need to know. LinkRunner works pretty quickly and always seems to be accurate."

"I like the fact that I can tell the equipment to stop at a certain point during the test of a cable, to see whether or not there is basic connectivity. I can stop it before it starts pinging the outside world, such as Google or, perhaps, our core network switch. Those basic results—do I have a basic connection and power—finish up fast and I can move on."

"It provides a way to test 10Gig connectivity. Previously, we had to hook up a switch. That was our only way. Now, with LinkRunner, we can test on the fly if an SFP is bad or if the switch has the right configuration on it."

"In terms of documenting ad hoc additions and other changes to wired ethernet connections, this product is very good. It keeps the information in the cloud and I have the ability to name it. This makes it very nice and easy to see."

Cons

"A feature that I would like to see is the ability to send a tone down the cable. That would be great. I have to use a separate tool for that. If I'm trying to troubleshoot a cable that is not plugged into a network switch, I need the ability to tone."

"They should allow firmware updates even if you don't have an AllyCare contract. I'm in a situation right now where they've released firmware for bug fixes, but we cannot access those, which makes the device almost useless. You almost want to just throw it out the window because they're not supporting their product unless you have an AllyCare contract."

"If it weren't for the battery, it would probably get an eight out of 10. But because of the battery, it's infuriating and it's not reliable."

"It does take a little while to boot up if it's turned off."

"It is very stable. That being said, there is one feature that is not quite as stable as the rest of the product. You can leave it plugged into a location where you're doing some work and connect to it remotely by a program called VNC... sometimes that function breaks down, if you've been running for a couple of days... if you're remotely controlling it, you're probably not right next to it. That can be modestly annoying."

"It runs tests quickly, but it takes a while to boot up. It's somewhat disappointing that LinkRunner takes some time to turn on. When I arrive in the space, I usually spend the first two minutes waiting."

"Unlike using an application like Wireshark, this device gives us no way to see network packets specifically to look at what's going on. It doesn't have the capability."

"I wish they had software that could create continuous streams of traffic. I'm not sure if that's possible with LinkRunner, but it would be very helpful in some of the test case scenarios that clients are looking for, in regards to quality of service"

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this device is very expensive, especially with the NetAlly Care on top of the costs. It is not for personal use and would be very expensive for smaller businesses."

"They offer one price. I do like paying for support because I get software updates that way."

"It's expensive but you definitely get what you pay for. I would buy another one if I had to."

"We... decided to go with NetAlly for the price and the bang for the buck."

"The area where the product could be improved is by having a lower cost so that I could have more than one. The price is competitive, but everybody would always like to see the price go down. I'd buy another one if it were cheaper."

"It's an expensive device. Don't expect it to be cheap. But the pricing is good. It certainly seemed in line with anything else I was looking at at the time."

"I would buy another one if I had a chance but they're too expensive. If they made it a bit cheaper, I think a lot of network engineers and network administrators would immediately jump onto it."

"It's reasonably priced in my market. It provides good value for money. The device is competitively priced as compared to other solutions. It gives you a lot of functionality and saves you a lot of time and resources. I see it as a good buy and good value for money. I stand for it."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

NetAlly EtherScope nXG vs LinkRunner

Compared 30% of the time

LinkSprinter vs LinkRunner

Compared 25% of the time

IxChariot vs LinkRunner

Compared 24% of the time

AirCheck G3 vs LinkRunner

Compared 12% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner

March 2025

Download LinkRunner product report

Buyer's Guide

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

March 2025

Download OneTouch AT Network Assistant product report

Overview

LinkRunner AT 3000 & 4000. Next Generation Copper and Fiber Ethernet AutoTester. Fast and comprehensive validation of network links and powerful copper and fiber network connectivity troubleshooting. Tests from 10Mbps to 10Gbps, PoE, VLAN, switch port, path analysis, packet capture, topology mapping and so much more!

NetAlly

The OneTouch AT Network Assistant is an automated All-in-one network tester for Ethernet and Wi-Fi troubleshooting and performance validation. The OneTouch AT troubleshoots desktop SIP/SCCP based VoIP problems in real-time with inline call monitoring, logging, and scoring. The OneTouch AT can automatically discover Wi-Fi devices and key device properties, including new 802.11ac access point and clients.

NetAlly

Sample Customers

Philips Healthcare, HCA Healthcare, University of South Dakota, Memorial Hermann, Baltimore County Public Schools, Aaramrak.

Disney, Carnival Cruise Line, Solarity Credit Union, Del Monte Foods, Lung Bioengineering, Peterbilt Motors Company,Port Angeles School District, Philips Healthcare, Denver University

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

March 2025

Free Report: LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.