


Logpoint and Trellix Active Response are both robust cybersecurity solutions. While users report being happier with Logpoint's pricing and support, Trellix Active Response offers more expansive features, providing better value overall.
Features: Logpoint is praised for its intuitive, customizable dashboards and comprehensive log management capabilities. Additionally, it offers real-time monitoring. Trellix Active Response stands out for its advanced threat detection, automated response features, and extensive integration capabilities. Despite Logpoint's strong offerings, Trellix's superior threat detection capabilities give it an edge.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Logpoint could enhance integration with third-party tools, improve documentation quality, and streamline its user interface. For Trellix Active Response, users feel it could benefit from simplifying the setup process, reducing the learning curve, and optimizing its user interface for better usability. Trellix's initial complexity is a more common concern.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint users find the deployment relatively straightforward and appreciate responsive customer service. Trellix Active Response poses challenges during setup, but users find customer service effective once past deployment hurdles. Logpoint's ease of deployment is generally better received, although both products have strong support teams.
Pricing and ROI: Logpoint is often noted for its competitive pricing and favorable ROI. Trellix Active Response, while perceived as pricier, justifies this cost with its advanced features and higher ROI due to enhanced threat detection capabilities. Logpoint is more cost-effective upfront, but Trellix's features potentially offer a greater long-term return.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
While we haven't yet quantified the financial benefits, we recognize that there has been a return on investment, particularly with operational efficiencies provided by the alerts.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
I would rate technical support from Trellix Active Response as a seven because sometimes we face difficulties finding engineers quickly, leading to customer frustration.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
The scalability of Active Response is satisfactory.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
We would like Trellix to optimize the technology for these systems similarly to how it is deployed for normal endpoints.
There is room for improvement in the platform area and security area to make the dashboard visibility clearer and easier for customers to monitor malicious activities occurring in their environment.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
Based on our evaluations, Trellix Active Response's pricing was the most feasible from a cost perspective.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
The most valuable feature, which is endpoint security, is included in Logpoint, and an extra feature is the integration.
They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the endpoints, allowing us to deploy a response quickly.
The most valuable feature of Trellix Active Response is that whenever any incident occurs, it allows us to disconnect from that particular network or area and shut down the system using commands.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Logpoint | 1.0% |
| Trellix Active Response | 0.6% |
| Other | 95.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.
Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.
What are the most important features of Logpoint?Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.
Trellix Active Response is designed for efficient endpoint protection and incident handling, with features like advanced analytics and user behavior monitoring. It allows swift identification of vulnerabilities and supports effective incident management through seamless system commands.
Focused on enabling secure corporate workstations, Trellix Active Response offers quick incident responses, comprehensive threat hunting, and defense visualization. The system prioritizes rapid log collection and correlation via the ePO dashboard, aiming to protect approximately 1,300 endpoints, especially on remote worker desktops and laptops. While it brings robust monitoring and investigation capabilities, the solution seeks improvements in analytics, interface clarity, and memory performance. There is a need for enhanced integration with on-premises deployments and AI functionalities.
What are the key features of Trellix Active Response?In corporate settings, Trellix Active Response is deployed for endpoint security, particularly for remote workstations that require robust protection. Companies transitioning from existing setups to Trellix benefit from its integration capabilities and threat hunting efficiency, supporting better management of active response tasks. Industry users appreciate the visual dashboard for improved threat response.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.