Lumu vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics comparison

Lumu Technologies and Splunk are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Lumu Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while Splunk is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8. Lumu Technologies holds a 2.2% mindshare in ID, compared to Splunk’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lumu Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,896 Views
872 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Read 25 Splunk User Behavior Analytics reviews

3,375 Views
844 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lumu

Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Lumu are competing products in the cybersecurity field. Lumu appears to have an edge due to its innovative features, despite Splunk User Behavior Analytics being favored for pricing and support.

Features: Splunk User Behavior Analytics specializes in identifying insider threats with anomaly detection and forensic analysis. It provides comprehensive indexing and powerful search capabilities and supports integration with other cybersecurity tools. Lumu excels in enhancing threat intelligence by continuous traffic monitoring to spot compromised assets, offers an easy-to-use interface with minimal alert fatigue, and provides an effective real-time detection system.

Room for Improvement: Splunk User Behavior Analytics could improve by reducing its setup complexity, enhancing user interface simplicity, and offering more cost-effective pricing options. Lumu may benefit from expanding its feature set to cover broader threat scenarios, offering more detailed analytics dashboards, and improving integration with additional third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk requires significant integration and configuration effort but is supported by dedicated teams. Lumu provides a streamlined deployment model with minimal setup time and is praised for responsive support that efficiently resolves issues.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk User Behavior Analytics demands higher initial setup costs, considered justified by long-term ROI through scalability and insights. Lumu offers a cost-effective setup with reports of strong ROI due to rapid threat mitigation and lower operational overhead, making it potentially better value with its cost-efficiency in delivering security outcomes.

To learn more, read our detailed Lumu vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lumu

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (8th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (17th)

Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Lumu is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk User Behavior Analytics is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Lumu	2.2%
Splunk User Behavior Analytics	2.4%
Other	95.4%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Siva Kuppala

Enterprise Architect at Wipro Limited

Offers intuitive deployment with strong customer support and advanced analytics features

There are improvements that could be made to Splunk User Behavior Analytics as any product will have advantages and disadvantages. Scalability is one consideration. For example, the advantages include rapid auto scaling to meet demand. A disadvantage is that it can lead to cost overrun if not properly factored or governed. The speed of deployment offers faster provisioning as an advantage, but it can require substantial automation skills and infrastructure as code expertise, which can be challenging. Cloud provides major operational benefits such as agility, automation, resilience, and global access when setting up on Cloud. However, it introduces challenges such as cost control, complexity, and vendor dependency. For example, global reach allows deployment of apps and services closer to users worldwide, but data sovereignty concerns exist and region selection must align with compliance requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to search through a large amount of data."

"It's easily scalable."

"Splunk's technical support is amazing."

"This is a good security product."

"The solution is extremely scalable. Our customers are regularly scaling up after installing Splunk."

"The best features in Splunk User Behavior Analytics include anomaly detection, behavioral profiling, and risk scoring and prioritization functionality."

"The most valuable features are its data aggregation and the ability to automatically identify a number of threats, then suggest recommended actions upon them."

"Because of some of the visualizations that we utilize, we are able to understand strange, unusual traffic on our networks."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics pros

Cons

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The reports need improvement."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"The solution is much more expensive than relative competitors like ArcSight or LogRhythm. It makes it hard to sell to customers sometimes."

"The machine learning algorithm in Splunk User Behavior Analytics is actually the core thing that needs to be updated because this feeds all the other functions inside it."

"The initial setup was complex because some of the configurations that we required needed customization."

"We want to have an automated system for bot hunting that enables us to detect anomalies predictively based on historical data. It would be helpful if Splunk included process mining as an alternative option. We have a threat workflow, but it would be useful if we could supplement that with some process mining capabilities over time."

"If the price was lowered and the setup process was less complex, I would consider rating it higher."

"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."

"A disadvantage is that it can lead to cost overrun if not properly factored or governed."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"There are additional costs associated with the integrator."

"I am not aware of the price, but it is expensive."

"Pricing varies based on the packages you choose and the volume of your usage."

"I hope we can increase the free license to be more than 5 gig a day. This would help people who want to introduce a POC or a demo license for the solution."

"My biggest complaint is the way they do pricing... You can never know the pricing for next year. Every single time you adjust to something new, the price goes up. It's impossible to truly budget for it. It goes up constantly."

"The licensing costs is around 10,000 dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk User Behavior Analytics?

The solution's most valuable feature is Splunk queries, which allow us to query the logs and analyze the attack vectors.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk User Behavior Analytics?

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a premium product. Compared to all other products in the market, it is the most expensive one in all aspects including professional service and licenses, even the ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk User Behavior Analytics?

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is still an immature product, so it still needs some R&D to be able to be mature in the market. The prediction, algorithms, and ML codes behind Splunk User Behavi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 27% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 12% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 6% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Compared 23% of the time

Exabeam vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Darktrace vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

Coralogix vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

January 2026

Download Lumu product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk User Behavior Analytics

January 2026

Download Splunk User Behavior Analytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Caspida, Splunk UBA

Overview

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a behavior-based threat detection is based on machine learning methodologies that require no signatures or human analysis, enabling multi-entity behavior profiling and peer group analytics for users, devices, service accounts and applications. It detects insider threats and external attacks using out-of-the-box purpose-built that helps organizations find known, unknown and hidden threats, but extensible unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides context around the threat via ML driven anomaly correlation and visual mapping of stitched anomalies over various phases of the attack lifecycle (Kill-Chain View). It uses a data science driven approach that produces actionable results with risk ratings and supporting evidence that increases SOC efficiency and supports bi-directional integration with Splunk Enterprise for data ingestion and correlation and with Splunk Enterprise Security for incident scoping, workflow management and automated response. The result is automated, accurate threat and anomaly detection.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

8 Securities, AAA Western, AdvancedMD, Amaya, Cerner Corporation, CJ O Shopping, CloudShare, Crossroads Foundation, 7-Eleven Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics

February 2026

Free Report: Lumu vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about Lumu vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lumu vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.