Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Lumu based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Darktrace, and Microsoft Defender XDR.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Lumu Technologies Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Lumu Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Wazuh provides open-source flexibility and comprehensive threat detection, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Lumu excels with real-time threat visibility and advanced intelligence, attracting enterprises seeking enhanced threat capabilities. Wazuh is praised for documentation support, while Lumu offers efficient deployment.
Microsoft Defender XDR offers comprehensive threat detection and seamless integration within Microsoft environments, appealing to those seeking enhanced ecosystem security. In comparison, Lumu provides unique network visibility and real-time threat intelligence, ideal for those prioritizing specialized insights and network-based threat detection.
Vectra AI offers strong real-time threat detection and automated responses. In comparison, Lumu provides pinpoint threat activity detection and seamless integration with security tools. Vectra AI's support and deployment ease are noteworthy, whereas Lumu stands out for cost-effectiveness and quick return on investment.
Cisco Secure Network Analytics excels in traffic analysis and seamless integration, ideal for enterprises focused on detailed network insights. In comparison, Lumu offers real-time threat detection and cost-effective deployment, providing an edge for smaller businesses prioritizing immediate returns and efficiency in network security.
Cisco Secure Network Analytics involves complex initial setup costs compared to Lumu, which offers a more straightforward and lower-cost implementation. These variations highlight the distinct focus each product has on setup and deployment flexibility.
Cisco Secure Network Analytics involves complex initial setup costs compared to Lumu, which offers a more straightforward and lower-cost implementation. These variations highlight the distinct focus each product has on setup and deployment flexibility.
Cynet offers competitive pricing and robust support with strong threat detection and integration capabilities. In comparison, Lumu justifies its higher cost with advanced data-driven insights and network visibility. Cynet appeals with straightforward deployment, while Lumu attracts those valuing detailed analysis and real-time insights.
Cynet has a higher setup cost compared to Lumu, making it a pricier option. In contrast, Lumu offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a significant cost advantage over Cynet.
Cynet has a higher setup cost compared to Lumu, making it a pricier option. In contrast, Lumu offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a significant cost advantage over Cynet.
Trend Vision One Cloud Security appeals with its cost-effectiveness, ease of deployment, and reliable support. In comparison, Lumu offers superior features with advanced threat intelligence and extensive long-term benefits, though it demands a higher initial investment yet provides significant ROI over time.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels in advanced threat detection and network visibility, delivering comprehensive analytics and extensive support. In comparison, Lumu offers ease of accessibility and intuitive threat intelligence with a straightforward, cloud-based deployment, appealing to budgets with cost-effective, actionable insights.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) setup costs can be high, reflecting its advanced features, while Lumu offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it appealing for those with cost constraints.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) setup costs can be high, reflecting its advanced features, while Lumu offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it appealing for those with cost constraints.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics excels with machine learning-driven anomaly detection and seamless SIEM integration, appealing to enterprises needing robust support. In comparison, Lumu's focus on continuous compromise assessments and agile deployment attracts buyers seeking proactive defense and cost-effective solutions.
Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with automated incident response and centralized data correlation. Its seamless integration provides visibility and management. Advanced analytics and machine learning identify threats efficiently. Users appreciate its integration, real-time detection, and automation but suggest better third-party integration, documentation, and more intuitive setup.
FortiGate IPS is ideal for those seeking extensive security features like advanced threat protection and VPN support. In comparison, Lumu excels in real-time threat intelligence with continuous monitoring. Tech buyers might choose FortiGate for comprehensive security or Lumu for streamlined deployment and flexibility.
Fortinet FortiGate IPS has a higher initial setup cost compared to Lumu, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting cost differences in user implementation investments.
Fortinet FortiGate IPS has a higher initial setup cost compared to Lumu, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting cost differences in user implementation investments.
Trellix offers strong support and cost-effective solutions focused on proactive threat prevention. In comparison, Lumu provides feature-rich capabilities for continuous compromise assessment. A tech buyer might choose Trellix for its pricing and integration or Lumu for its insights and flexibility.
Trellix Network Detection and Response incurs a higher setup cost compared to Lumu, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Trellix Network Detection and Response incurs a higher setup cost compared to Lumu, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
NetWitness NDR attracts tech buyers with its cost-effective pricing and comprehensive threat detection features. In comparison, Lumu appeals with its superior features, real-time traffic analysis, and pay-as-you-go pricing model, though it may involve higher initial costs for greater long-term value.
NetWitness NDR setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its robust feature set, while Lumu offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to users seeking cost-effective solutions.
NetWitness NDR setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its robust feature set, while Lumu offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to users seeking cost-effective solutions.
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB excels in real-time threat prevention and robust protective measures. In comparison, Lumu offers continuous compromise assessment and flexible deployment, appealing to businesses seeking quick returns with enhanced analytics and adaptive security.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 excels in advanced threat detection and real-time analytics, offering substantial returns on investment. In comparison, Lumu provides efficient deployment with intuitive threat intelligence and competitive pricing, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions with effective threat categorization and usability.
LogRhythm NDR excels in providing comprehensive threat intelligence and reporting for enterprises needing detailed insights. In comparison, Lumu appeals to those seeking simplicity with real-time visibility and lower costs, offering efficient security management with quick returns.
LogRhythm NDR setup costs are typically higher than Lumu, highlighting a substantial pricing difference for initial implementation between these network detection solutions.
LogRhythm NDR setup costs are typically higher than Lumu, highlighting a substantial pricing difference for initial implementation between these network detection solutions.
Corelight Open NDR enhances security operations by providing comprehensive network visibility. Its valuable features include efficient threat detection and flexible deployment options. However, some users express a need for enhanced integration capabilities and improved documentation. It's ideal for identifying security threats effectively.
