ManageEngine OpManager vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant comparison

Why PeerSpot?

ManageEngine and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3, while Juniper is ranked #53 with an average rating of 8.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

8,974 Views
8,615 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 3 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

2,483 Views
2,384 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in the network management solutions category. Based on the comparison, ManageEngine OpManager stands out for its cost-effectiveness and monitoring capabilities, whereas Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is advantageous for AI-driven insights and advanced functionalities.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers robust network performance monitoring, fault management, and customizable dashboards, providing users with comprehensive infrastructure control. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant leverages AI capabilities for predictive insights, automated troubleshooting, and operational efficiency enhancements, making it ideal for sophisticated network environments.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could improve by incorporating AI functionalities, enhancing integration with modern technologies, and offering more user-friendly setups. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant may benefit from expanding network monitoring features, creating more customizable dashboards, and reducing the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers a traditional on-premises deployment model with extensive support options for organizations preferring direct installation. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant utilizes a cloud-based deployment simplifying system integration and reducing setup time. Marvis also focuses on providing responsive customer support aimed at solution efficiency, contrasting OpManager's conventional methods.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is available with a competitive pricing structure suitable for budget-conscious businesses, providing favorable ROI through lower upfront costs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant, while requiring higher initial investment, demonstrates long-term cost-effectiveness through AI optimizations reducing operational expenses. OpManager offers immediate affordability, while Marvis delivers greater ROI with prolonged integration.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

53rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.4%
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant	0.5%
Other	98.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ashutosh Jha

Project engineer at IT Solution india private limited

Centralized monitoring has highlighted limited device control but has improved proactive actions

I have configured adaptive thresholds on servers while using ManageEngine OpManager. If there is high CPU utilization or storage usage, the system will notify me or reset the system or reset the services. ManageEngine OpManager has multiple features that are valuable to our organization. We have integrated our firewall into ManageEngine OpManager, and it provides us notifications for firewall issues as well. ManageEngine OpManager provides an adaptive threshold feature that is very effective. The alerts and the ability to restart services or computers or end devices in ManageEngine OpManager are what I find most valuable. If we have set performance monitoring adaptive thresholds and they exceed the configured value, the system will take action automatically. We can also integrate our switches and access points and control them from ManageEngine OpManager.

Read full review

IhorShtanko

Technical Consultant Of Juniper Networks Division at MUK

AI assistant has transformed network troubleshooting and now reduces downtime and support tickets

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant has resolved all problems that network administrators face, making it challenging to identify areas for improvement. Marvis provides good analytics, recommendations, and problem resolutions. One potential enhancement would be to add different languages for different countries because Marvis currently uses only English. For example, since I live in Ukraine, it would be beneficial to communicate with Marvis in Ukrainian because not all administrators know English.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product provides intensive reports."

"OpManager can monitor network utilization, downtime, and services in real time."

"ManageEngine OpManager allows us to manage all our organization's firewalls, switches, and critical servers from a single console, requiring only one person to oversee all operations."

"The setup was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts, as the administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately, and this is the feature we value and use the most."

"OpManager technical support is good."

"Once it was set up and running, there were no issues with it, and it seems to run fairly well."

"Easy and agentless to deploy, service and support is excellent."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"I believe the pricing of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is reasonable because it allows for a decrease in the quantity of network administrators needed and reduces operational costs."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

Cons

"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."

"WMI and SNMP integration with the domain controller should be seamless"

"This solution is not suitable for enterprise-sized deployments, as it sometimes hangs and needs to be restarted."

"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."

"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."

"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."

"Support is very bad. They should improve support and customer relationship."

"The pricing of the solution is high."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"One potential enhancement would be to add different languages for different countries because Marvis currently uses only English."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Not all customers use Marvis Virtual Network Assistant because it represents an additional cost as a subscription service. Mist Cloud is a microservices platform, and to use it, customers must purc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is primarily used for fast troubleshooting and identifying root problems across the entire network. It has decreased the quantity of tickets that customers can open...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 8% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 6% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 6% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

October 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2026

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager offers real-time network performance monitoring and reporting. Known for its customizable dashboards and topology maps, it supports device monitoring and alerting, enhanced by features like Firewall Analyzer and NetFlow.

Designed for network infrastructure management, ManageEngine OpManager monitors servers, devices, applications, and security across on-premise and cloud environments. Adaptive thresholds and automation simplify proactive monitoring, while issues with dashboard design, business view enhancements, performance stability in large deployments, and licensing warrant attention. Its machine learning and AI could be more advanced. Despite these, organizations use its comprehensive dashboards for real-time insights into CPU, RAM, and disk utilization, receiving notifications for unauthorized requests or performance issues.

What are the key features of ManageEngine OpManager?

Network Reporting: Provides detailed reports for network performance.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers continuous monitoring of network parameters.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows for personalized dashboard setups for unique insights.
Topology Maps: Visualizes network layout for easier management.
Device Monitoring: Ensures all network devices are operating efficiently.
Automation: Streamlines network operations with automated tasks.
Firewall Analyzer: Enhances security measures and performance monitoring.
NetFlow: Analyzes bandwidth usage and traffic patterns.
Application Manager: Monitors server and application performance.

What benefits should users expect from ManageEngine OpManager?

Improved Network Performance: Real-time insights enhance network efficiency.
Proactive Alerts: Early warnings help address issues before they escalate.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies management with comprehensive integration features.
Scalability: Supports growth with multi-location deployment capabilities.

ManageEngine OpManager is widely implemented in industries requiring robust network infrastructure management. Companies in sectors with complex server and application needs benefit from its monitoring and alerting capabilities. Its ability to manage and provide insights across distributed locations makes it a valuable tool for enterprises operating in both on-premise and cloud environments.

ManageEngine

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant delivers AI-driven solutions for network management, providing intelligent insights and automation to drive operational efficiency and enhance user experience.

Marvis uses machine learning and natural language processing to offer seamless network operations. It contextualizes issues, automates support tasks, and provides actionable insights to help IT teams make informed decisions. This leads to improved network performance and reliability, fostering a proactive approach in managing network environments.

What are the key features of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

AI-driven Insights: Leverages AI to analyze network data and identify patterns, helping in quick issue resolution.
Natural Language Processing: Simplifies user interactions by interpreting natural language queries.
Automated Support: Automates common network tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Contextual Recommendations: Provides suggestions based on network context and usage patterns.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Automation reduces the need for extensive IT resources.
Enhanced User Experience: Quick issue detection and resolution improve network reliability.
Informed Decision Making: Actionable insights help in strategic network planning.
Increased Efficiency: Automation and AI streamline network management tasks, saving time.

Industries such as healthcare and education implement Marvis Virtual Network Assistant to ensure secure, reliable connectivity. In healthcare, it supports essential communication and patient data management, while in education, it ensures seamless access to digital learning platforms, optimizing both environments effectively.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

November 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.