Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs Mist AI and Cloud comparison

The compared Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and Mist AI and Cloud solutions aren't in the same category. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is ranked #46 in NMS , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 0.1% mindshare in the category. Mist AI and Cloud is ranked #13 in Wireless LAN , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Mist AI and Cloud users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

222 Views
140 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mist AI and Cloud

Read 23 Mist AI and Cloud reviews

4,172 Views
2,824 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Mist AI and Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and Mist AI and Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,823 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (46th)

Mist AI and Cloud

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Wireless LAN (13th)

Mindshare comparison

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and Mist AI and Cloud aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is designed for Network Monitoring Software and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Mist AI and Cloud, on the other hand, focuses on Wireless LAN, holds 2.2% mindshare, down 3.3% since last year.

Network Monitoring Software

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

RahulSivanandan

Network Manager at Bread LLC

Analytics and automation simplify wireless management and proactive troubleshooting

The analytics part of Mist AI and Cloud is really helpful, including correlation and event analysis. These features make Mist AI and Cloud stand out in the market. The automation capabilities are quite impressive, making it easy to manage and maintain. Mist AI and Cloud's orchestration is beneficial for troubleshooting and proactive analysis, offering proactive solutions before issues arise. Additionally, the platform is easy to deploy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"The tool's best part is the GUI. It is user-friendly and fast due to AI features. The solution can help you fix things with AI, which is impressive."

"Mist is a really good tool that provides essential AI information from an operational point of view, covering both wireless and switching."

"Multi PSK (Pre-shared Key) is a very good feature in the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Natural language patching is an important feature."

"AI is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable aspect is that they operate on small microservices, offering numerous open APIs that enhance the value of our Wi-Fi network. This flexibility allows us to optimize various aspects such as workforce planning and occupancy management. The platform is highly open in the market, providing robust APIs for seamless integration with other tools. Currently, we leverage these capabilities at a building site, incorporating IoT sensors to gather data. The collected data is stored in a centralized location, and we plan to use AI for analysis. This analysis will include insights on peak activity times, humidity levels, temperature variations, and other relevant metrics within the building."

"Ability to control the access points by groups."

More Mist AI and Cloud pros

Cons

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"Regarding opportunities for improvement in Mist, it is notable for its robust cloud portal and integration of artificial intelligence into various services, creating a highly efficient environment for work. However, a drawback lies in the cost associated with its WiFi offerings. With a pricing range of twelve hundred to fifteen hundred dollars for a single Access Point, exclusive of the subscription, it is acknowledged as a relatively expensive solution in the realm of WiFi services. Despite this drawback, the positive attributes of Mist make it a noteworthy option."

"The solution doesn't provide mail notifications currently."

"Configuration could be improved."

"There are some technical issues that may require attention"

"There is no local support for Mist in Brazil."

"The solution lacks documentation."

"Mist AI and Cloud should improve its integrations."

"The user experience should be improved. It's not user-friendly."

More Mist AI and Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"Depending on the features, I think it's quite reasonably priced, especially considering the facilities of the product."

"The price is about the same compared to other vendors. There is an add-on license, but it's up to you if you want to buy it or not."

"Mist AI and Cloud is expensive."

"The solution's price is too high for the end-users. My customers pay 1,000 USD towards the licensing cost of the solution every year."

"The price of Mist AI and Cloud is approximately 20 percent less than competitors, such as Aruba and Cisco. However, Cisco has a lifetime warranty for its solutions."

"The annual cost is a significant issue for us, and it notably contributes to the overall price. We have a customer with nearly fifty-eight access points in a multifunctional building, and while the setup was relatively simple, the yearly licensing cost is substantial. For the specific features we utilize, the licensing amounts to about forty thousand euros annually. This is not a trivial expense and significantly impacts the overall cost, making it quite high."

"The price is not cheap, but it's a reliable solution and very easy for management."

"I rate the pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."

More Mist AI and Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

16%

Retailer

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

29%

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mist AI and Cloud?

AI-driven automation helps implement the solution quickly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mist AI and Cloud?

Compared with other solutions, Mist AI and Cloud is not that expensive and is considered moderate in pricing. The solution is priced per device.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mist AI and Cloud?

The support needs improvement. Since the merger or integration between Mist AI and Cloud and HP, it has affected service quality negatively. The reachability, access, and response time of the suppo...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 32% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 24% of the time

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 24% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 34% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Mist AI and Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

Mist AI and Cloud

May 2025

Download Mist AI and Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Mist Access Points

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

Mist AI uses a combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences and simplify operations across the wireless access, wired access, and SD-WAN domains.

Data is ingested from numerous sources, including Juniper Mist Access Points, Switches, Session Smart Routers, and Firewalls for end-to-end insight into user experiences. These devices work in concert with Mist AI to optimize user experiences from client-to-cloud, including automated event correlation, root cause identification, Self-Driving Network™ operations, network assurance, proactive anomaly detection, and more.

Juniper also leverages Mist AI for next-generation customer support. It is the foundational element behind Marvis, the industry’s first AI-driven Virtual Network Assistant, which provides extensive insight and guidance to IT staff via a natural language conversational interface.

With Mist AI, operators save time and money with faster problem resolution and fewer onsite visits. Users benefit from a network infrastructure that is more predictable, reliable, and measurable.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Dartmouth, Hitachi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Nebraska Furniture Mart, NTT, Okta

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.