ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

ManageEngine and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

7,680 Views
7,373 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

OpenText Network Operations...

Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews

1,823 Views
1,404 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

OpenText Network Operations...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and OpenText Network Operations Management compete in the network monitoring solutions space. ManageEngine OpManager has an edge due to its pricing structure and efficient customer support, whereas OpenText Network Operations Management leads with its advanced feature set and comprehensive capabilities.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager provides robust network performance monitoring, fault management, and detailed reporting to ensure effective network operation. OpenText Network Operations Management is equipped with extensive network management capabilities, advanced automation features, and flexible integration options, which are beneficial for large-scale enterprises managing complex network environments.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could enhance its automation capabilities, integrate more advanced analytics tools, and streamline its user interface for improved efficiency. OpenText Network Operations Management could improve by reducing complexity during setup, offering more competitive pricing, and simplifying user navigation to enhance usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer support that minimizes downtime during implementation. OpenText Network Operations Management, while featuring more complex setup due to its extensive capabilities, provides structured support channels to assist deployment, which might require a longer integration period.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is noted for providing cost-effective solutions with quick ROI, attributed to its affordable pricing model. In contrast, OpenText Network Operations Management is positioned at a higher price point but delivers substantial ROI justified by its sophisticated features and scalability. ManageEngine, known for being budget-friendly, is suitable for small to mid-sized enterprises, whereas OpenText is optimal for larger enterprises seeking advanced functionality despite the higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Network Operations...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.5%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.5%
OpenText Network Operations Management	0.4%
Other	98.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Llahir Albar

Technical Solution Specialist at Crypto-gen

Has helped centrally manage users and assets while making operational tasks more efficient

The main drawback is there is less documentation available, both public documentation and partner-available documentation. The learning materials are very limited, and there is also a limitation of support SLA. It takes a huge amount of time to resolve certain issues when ManageEngine OpManager technical support gets involved. The expertise of support is limited. Reporting could be improved with more details. The content and richness can be improved on the reports. To make ManageEngine OpManager a better product, the first priority is improving the after-sales support and learning materials for local engineers and partners to enhance their capacities and expertise. The second priority is improving the product itself, including dashboards and reporting enrichment. Lastly, new feature adoption such as DLP or endpoint monitoring should be considered. Features that should be offered include DLP, Privileged User Access, data classification, and MDR. These are features that can be groomed around the MMS if properly configured.

Read full review

AhmedBahgat

Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable

The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product itself is very good."

"OpManager technical support is good."

"The ease of use and comprehensive integration are the most valuable features"

"The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."

"We run weekly and monthly reports to provide exceptions, and it's helped our organization remediate problems proactively."

"This is a good general monitoring system that has all the features we require and they constantly update with new capabilities."

"It has more functionality than what we use it for, so I think it's overall a good solution."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

Cons

"One challenge in ManageEngine OpManager is that improvements are needed because a customer using the solution has Check Point firewall and needs to monitor their VPN tunnels, but there is no option currently available for that."

"The pricing of ManageEngine OpManager is high concerning the licensing cost, and many clients express a preference for a one-time payment option without renewals, as the ongoing costs affect their operations."

"The dashboard has some limitations and should be more user-friendly."

"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."

"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."

"Based on the high cost, I'd rate the solution six out of ten. I don't know if I would recommend it."

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"It may need a more customizable UI."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"The solution's pricing is very low compared to other products."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

"The product is not worth the money."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

25%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The price is reasonable based on the agreement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 10% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

ScienceLogic vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

FireMon Asset Manager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

July 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

July 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management report

Download OpenText Network Operations Management product report

Also Known As

OpManager

Micro Focus Network Operations Management

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager offers real-time network performance monitoring and reporting. Known for its customizable dashboards and topology maps, it supports device monitoring and alerting, enhanced by features like Firewall Analyzer and NetFlow.

Designed for network infrastructure management, ManageEngine OpManager monitors servers, devices, applications, and security across on-premise and cloud environments. Adaptive thresholds and automation simplify proactive monitoring, while issues with dashboard design, business view enhancements, performance stability in large deployments, and licensing warrant attention. Its machine learning and AI could be more advanced. Despite these, organizations use its comprehensive dashboards for real-time insights into CPU, RAM, and disk utilization, receiving notifications for unauthorized requests or performance issues.

What are the key features of ManageEngine OpManager?

Network Reporting: Provides detailed reports for network performance.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers continuous monitoring of network parameters.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows for personalized dashboard setups for unique insights.
Topology Maps: Visualizes network layout for easier management.
Device Monitoring: Ensures all network devices are operating efficiently.
Automation: Streamlines network operations with automated tasks.
Firewall Analyzer: Enhances security measures and performance monitoring.
NetFlow: Analyzes bandwidth usage and traffic patterns.
Application Manager: Monitors server and application performance.

What benefits should users expect from ManageEngine OpManager?

Improved Network Performance: Real-time insights enhance network efficiency.
Proactive Alerts: Early warnings help address issues before they escalate.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies management with comprehensive integration features.
Scalability: Supports growth with multi-location deployment capabilities.

ManageEngine OpManager is widely implemented in industries requiring robust network infrastructure management. Companies in sectors with complex server and application needs benefit from its monitoring and alerting capabilities. Its ability to manage and provide insights across distributed locations makes it a valuable tool for enterprises operating in both on-premise and cloud environments.

ManageEngine

OpenText Network Operations Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed for efficient network operations and management. It helps organizations streamline their network processes, ensuring enhanced performance and reliability in complex IT environments.

The platform is robust, providing capabilities that align with industry needs for automation and integration. Its powerful analytics and monitoring features enable IT teams to effectively manage network performance, detect anomalies, and ensure uptime. OpenText Network Operations Management supports scalable IT infrastructures, ensuring reliable operations in both cloud and on-premises settings.

What are the key features of OpenText Network Operations Management?

Scalable Monitoring: Provides continuous visibility into network performance across all environments.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks through automated workflows and alerts.
Incident Management: Enables rapid detection and resolution of network issues.
Analytics: Offers insights through advanced analytics tools to optimize operations.

What benefits or ROI can be expected from OpenText Network Operations Management?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlined processes and automation lead to higher productivity.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and reduces maintenance costs.
Improved Reliability: Enhances network uptime and performance.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.

OpenText Network Operations Management is utilized in sectors like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where reliable network performance is crucial. It supports critical operations by ensuring seamless integration and effective management of network resources in these industries.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

August 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.