

Microsoft Configuration Manager and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus compete in system and patch management. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus appears to have the upper hand, offering superior versatility and affordability, along with comprehensive third-party application management.
Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager is known for efficient application deployment, in-depth patch management, and comprehensive integration with other Microsoft products, which users find valuable for compliance data gathering and inventory management. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus stands out for its effective third-party application patch management, robust remote patching capabilities, and strong audit and reporting features.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could benefit from enhanced PowerShell integration, improved support for non-Microsoft products, and better automation features. For ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, users suggest simplifying the user interface, improving remote patching efficiency, and offering a more adaptable pricing model for organizations of different scales.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer on-premises deployment, with Microsoft Configuration Manager also supporting cloud and hybrid solutions. Users find ManageEngine offers an easier deployment process for smaller operations. Microsoft Configuration Manager's technical support experiences vary by support tier, while ManageEngine provides reliable support and a strong online knowledge base.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager features a higher cost with extensive licensing complexities, potentially providing a robust ROI through enterprise system integration. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is noted for its transparent pricing model and cost-effectiveness, delivering significant savings and reduced operational costs, enhancing ROI across various organization sizes.
Compared to other products, ManageEngine provides good return on investment within five years.
With Microsoft Configuration Manager, these processes are automated and managed, reducing the time required by roughly 40 to 50 percent.
You do not have to raise a ticket and wait for them to respond.
Customer service and support are excellent, with a perfect score of ten out of ten.
The technical support from ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is helpful.
Their response time and first-level support quality need improvement.
For technical support from Microsoft, I would rate them a nine.
Scalability requires downtime for performance adjustments.
The default instance, which most customers run, can take up to 5,000 endpoints.
In our organization, which has grown by adding more endpoints, remote users, and hybrid devices, Microsoft Configuration Manager has managed to handle the increased workload without requiring major changes on our side.
The product is suitable for our size, handling 800 devices.
I have not had any downtime in six years.
The solution is very stable.
There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself.
When the patch testing works well, there is no need for patch management rollbacks.
Instead of separate technician licenses for each product, there should be a single bundled license to simplify licensing requirements.
You cannot create multiple tasks, which is another significant issue.
A better command line interface for Microsoft Configuration Manager would be an additional feature I would to see in the future to make it closer to a perfect score.
I can suggest that Microsoft Configuration Manager should get the Autopilot feature because Autopilot is the main part of Intune, and nowadays everybody is using Autopilot.
Overall, Microsoft Configuration Manager is a powerful and reliable platform.
Currently, I am paying around three dollars per agent per month.
There is a concern regarding the exchange rate as one dollar equals six reais today, making everything expensive in dollars for us.
ManageEngine's licensing model recently changed from being endpoint-based to server-based, which might affect costs during the next renewal.
The cost is reasonable considering the enterprise-level features, but it scales depending on the number of managed devices and the inclusion of Intune for co-management.
The setup cost is considered sufficient.
The pricing for Microsoft Configuration Manager is okay for me.
The software covers platform security and application security, ensuring everything is updated at the endpoint level.
Second, you get remote access capabilities, meaning you can take the device remotely and provide support, with the session recorded for playback if needed.
The vulnerability scanning highlights outdated PCs and users breaching policies.
If I want to get a fetch report for anything, such as hardware-related issues or group policy-related issues, I need to fetch the report by using SCCM's scripting language and remediation part.
The most valuable features I find in Microsoft Configuration Manager are mostly patching, deploying software, deploying images, and running custom scripts.
In my experience, the best features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are software deployments and updates, OSD, hardware and software inventory, compliance and configuration baseline, reporting and monitoring, and integration with Intune hybrid management.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Configuration Manager | 7.8% |
| ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus | 4.6% |
| Other | 87.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
Patch Manager Plus is a simple patch management tool that makes it easy to keep your network patched and secure. It is an endpoint patch management software that provides enterprises a single interface for automating all patch management tasks - from detecting missing patches to deploying patches - for Windows, Mac, Linux and 250+ third-party applications. Whether you have one computer or hundred, they can all be patched at the same time from a single point of console.
Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.
Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.
What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.