No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

MariaDB vs Percona Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

MariaDB
Ranking in Open Source Databases
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (8th)
Percona Server
Ranking in Open Source Databases
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of MariaDB is 5.8%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Percona Server is 2.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
MariaDB5.8%
Percona Server2.4%
Other91.8%
Open Source Databases
 

Featured Reviews

AB
Co-Founder at Vsigma IT Labs Pvt Ltd
Has supported web application data needs but requires design adjustments to manage complex queries efficiently
Complex queries in MariaDB where the query needs to parse thousands of lines or data values face some performance issues. For small and medium-size volume, it is pretty good. If it goes beyond certain data and complex queries, we see performance issues. We tried the advanced replication feature between different regions, replicating data specifically residing on MariaDB to two different regions of MariaDB data, and there were some technical snags in terms of slowness and longer processing time. Point-in-time recovery in MariaDB is good for small databases. When data volume increases beyond 5 GB or 10 GB per day or runs into double-digit GBs, we found some performance issues. For data below 10 GB, it works fine. Performance is the primary focus area for MariaDB, particularly during transactions or complex query jobs where slow performance is observed. MariaDB is scalable and easy to scale.
Frederico De Almeida - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Infrastructure Analyst at Embratur
Clustered databases have improved consistency and reduced downtime for critical applications
Percona Server offers excellent scalability and easy configuration. The configuration feature is particularly valuable to me because adding a new server requires minimal effort, which streamlines my workflow. Database consistency is the most important feature for me. Percona Server has positively impacted my organization by reducing downtime for applications and improving backup capabilities. Percona Server has improved downtime and backup management by making it easy to switch to another server when necessary, and it includes built-in backup functionality.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If you want a reliable, easy to maintain database solution, I think that MariaDB on RedHat/CentOS is an option that every DBA should consider."
"If they want an open-source database that can handle huge volumes and is reliable and strong, then I would recommend it."
"From a customer perspective, MariaDB is a good choice for cluster configuration. It's also easy to operate and cheap."
"A valuable feature is that we can use it for quite a few things, all the things you'd expect from a server—along the lines of Linux's Lightweight Directory."
"This solution is user-friendly."
"From the user's perspective, the performance of the columnar queries is very good in terms of the database when comparing it to the Oracle and MySQL."
"MariaDB is very stable."
"I recommend this solution; it's great for web applications and it just works."
"We find the product mostly stable."
"Percona Server has positively impacted my organization by providing a consistent database and persistence, and it reduces the downtime for the replication of applications during disasters."
"Percona Server has positively impacted my organization by reducing downtime for applications and improving backup capabilities."
"In my use of Percona Server, I've found that the replication and High Availability features are the most valuable."
 

Cons

"MariaDB doesn't handle long or complex SQL queries quite as well as Oracle Database."
"The configuration could be improved. It should be easier."
"The solution should do some fine-tuning on maybe the transaction per second so that users can get more than they can on the Microsoft SQL Server."
"The interface should be more user-friendly. It should be able to connect directly to the database and interact with it without having to use commands."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements in the scalability and redundancy features."
"Replication could be better, and it's not so simple. It would be better if they had a replication server."
"We'd like more data intelligence."
"The stability could always continue to be improved upon."
"It doesn't reclaim disk space when rows are deleted."
"Percona Server could be improved by adding more advanced query fields, which would be very helpful."
"More material would be helpful for understanding how to further optimize the implementation."
"If Percona had flashback capabilities, it would be ideal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I used the open-source version, which is available free of charge."
"The cost is quite good. You can have the open source, free version, which has adequate capacity."
"My company uses the free version of the solution."
"The price of this solution represents a very good compromise between the cost and what it offers."
"The product is not expensive."
"It is free of charge."
"It is an open-source solution."
"This is an open-source product, which can be used free of charge."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
9%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise26
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MariaDB?
The integration with other products is seamless.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MariaDB?
MariaDB is in the pricey range, especially for huge databases handling terabytes of data. The cost depends on the volume of data and different features enabled during configuration, such as backup ...
What needs improvement with MariaDB?
Sometimes, complex queries that were supported in Oracle are not available in MariaDB. Advanced indexing is not available. Oracle is very advanced compared to MariaDB, and those advanced features a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Percona Server?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I am using the free version.
What needs improvement with Percona Server?
Percona Server could be improved by adding more advanced query fields, which would be very helpful.
What is your primary use case for Percona Server?
Percona Server is my main solution for electronic information systems, and I use Percona XtraDB Cluster for this purpose. Percona Server has facilitated the configuration of clusters compared to us...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Wikipedia, Tencent, Verizon, DBS Bank, Deutsche Bank, Telefónica, Huatai Securities
Pricefalls Marketplace, Micpoint, Rent the Runway, Transmart, Wattpad, Singular Group, Invoca, 3E
Find out what your peers are saying about MariaDB vs. Percona Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.