Percona Server vs PostgreSQL comparison

Read 127 PostgreSQL reviews

11,958 Views
9,806 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Percona Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

PostgreSQL and Percona Server compete in the database solutions category. Based on feature flexibility and community support, PostgreSQL may have the edge, though Percona excels in specific performance and replication features.

Features: PostgreSQL offers GIS support, full-text search, JSON support, and easy replication. Its open-source nature allows customization and flexibility, making it adaptable to various needs. It is acclaimed for reliability and disaster recovery, alongside strong community support. Percona Server is known for excellent replication and high availability. It includes Kubernetes Operator support for MongoDB and built-in backup functionalities, providing robust solutions for complex database tasks.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL could improve ease of use in installation and database management interfaces. Enhancements in real-time data support, query optimization, and scalability are necessary. Percona Server could benefit from more sophisticated query fields and better guidance for deployment in environments like Docker and Kubernetes. Improved documentation and materials could enhance ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL supports deployment in Public, Private, and Hybrid Cloud environments, as well as on-premises setups, benefiting from a large community-driven support system. Percona Server mainly focuses on on-premises deployment with community support. Both rely heavily on community support rather than traditional customer service.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL is free to use as an open-source solution, making it appealing for cost-effective database solutions, with significant ROI through savings in licensing and support. Percona Server is also open-source and free, offering similar financial benefits. Both products provide excellent ROI for organizations looking to minimize database expenses while maximizing scalability and performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Percona Server vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: June 2026).

Percona Server vs. PostgreSQL

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Percona Server

Ranking in Open Source Databases

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

127

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Percona Server is 2.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 13.1%, down from 18.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PostgreSQL	13.1%
Percona Server	2.4%
Other	84.5%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Pieter Geelen

Freelancer at geelen.io

Reliable open-source database has supported our migration and improved e-commerce performance

Percona Server seems great to me overall. If I had to think of any small area for improvement for Percona Server, it would be around the proxy story. When adding a proxy to manage traffic better, we first tried SQL Proxy, but it never really worked for us, which was unfortunate because SQL Proxy offers better optimizations for read performance. We did have success with HAProxy, but it works on a network level, while SQL Proxy was designed to be SQL-aware and distribute parts of the query across the database cluster. The performance gain we were hoping for with SQL Proxy did not materialize, so we remained on the network level with HAProxy. Databases can be finicky regarding the performance they need. We had some disk I/O latency issues, which led us to use different types of nodes in our Kubernetes cluster where we provisioned Percona Server explicitly. There is a lot of IOPS happening under the hood, and while I suspect the application was not very efficient, it was also challenging to identify that we were experiencing performance issues due to disk performance. It would be helpful to clarify the metrics related to disk I/O latency so we could understand where our bottlenecks are.

Read full review

Shobhit Goel

Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient

High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency

The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Percona Server's scalability is very strong, as it features thread pooling for over 10,000 connections, scales out horizontally, and comes with XtraDB Cluster and ProxySQL, making it very effective."

"Percona Server has positively impacted my organization because it is open source, and if the official MongoDB goes in different directions or makes its product expensive, we can still use Percona Server, which serves as a sort of safety net."

"In my use of Percona Server, I've found that the replication and High Availability features are the most valuable."

"Percona Server has positively impacted my organization by reducing downtime for applications and improving backup capabilities."

"After switching to Percona Server, we were able to resolve those issues quickly."

"We find the product mostly stable."

"The product is free, which is a huge benefit."

"I worked for years on Oracle, and I decided to move on PostgreSQL because I think it is a first class product."

"PostgreSQL is very easy to use, and because I have experience in Oracle SQL and PostgreSQL uses the same syntax, it is easy for me to develop."

"Because we use it in many information systems (Financial, Human Resources, Inventory Management) in several large companies with significant data flow, we have not had problems."

"Overall it is an excellent RDBMS and it is easy to use and administer."

"It is a world class, performer, a scalable database that is free and open source."

"PostgreSQL is stable. It's available, stable, and reliable."

"Postgres is rock solid when deployed according to best practices as documented by the PostgreSQL community. When it's installed correctly, PostgreSQL is an enterprise-grade solution."

Cons

"If Percona had flashback capabilities, it would be ideal."

"If I had to think of any small area for improvement for Percona Server, it would be around the proxy story."

"Percona Server could be improved to keep pace with other flavors of MySQL, such as MariaDB, and could pivot to be Percona Server for MariaDB given Oracle's reduced investment in MySQL recently."

"I also think there should be more use cases and documentation on deploying in Kubernetes with real-life examples, as currently, the documentation is minimal, making it difficult in a production situation."

"It doesn't reclaim disk space when rows are deleted."

"Percona Server could be improved by adding more advanced query fields, which would be very helpful."

"The multi-master replication feature needs improvement."

"In the next release, I would like to see better integration with other platforms."

"Sometimes, it becomes slow because of the network. So, there is room for improvement in performance."

"Postgres should focus on building a stronger knowledge base. They also need to expand their integration capabilities, so more tools and resources are available to manage it."

"It lacks the ability to distribute queries across multiple installations out of the box."

"Less advanced programmers may have a bit of a learning curve."

"I have faced a few issues while installing it and configuring it; most of them related to incompatibility while using old Ubuntu Linux versions."

"I would love to have primary keys on views. This function missing has made PostgreSQL harder than need be with Microsoft Access as a front end."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."

"The need for our customers to pay for licences is contingent on their projects and budgets."

"Affordable solution."

"It is an open-source platform."

"It is open source. There is no licensing."

"We do not pay for licensing."

"It could be much cheaper. If you would like to build an application on Amazon today, PostgreSQL is the standard database with Redshift. If you want other databases, you can add them, but PostgreSQL is the basis of everything. It's a question of money, that's it."

"We are using the free version of PostgreSQL."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

22%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Percona Server?

I do not have experience with pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Percona Server.

What needs improvement with Percona Server?

I believe it would be great to have tools to deploy Percona Server in Docker so that we can split a huge database server into many small servers, which are easier to maintain and delegate to junior...

What is your primary use case for Percona Server?

My main use case for Percona Server is deploying the community version without support to MongoDB servers in Kubernetes, and I also use Percona Server Exporter tools. Using Percona Server for deplo...

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

I purchased from the marketplace, so licensing and pricing cost is acceptable. To be honest, there is a separate team who handles the cost of licensing everything. I have admin access on Azure and ...

What needs improvement with PostgreSQL?

The only thing for PG vector is if the dimension limit could be increased. Currently, the dimension limit is around 1,000 to 1,052. If I need to increase the dimension to 3,000 or 5,000, that optio...

MariaDB vs Percona Server

Comparisons

MySQL vs Percona Server

Compared 21% of the time

Compared 19% of the time

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs Percona Server

Compared 12% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Percona Server

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs Percona Server

Compared 7% of the time

More Percona Server Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 13% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 6% of the time

LanceDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Percona Server

Download Percona Server product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

Overview

Percona Server is a MySQL alternative offering improved performance and scalability for databases used in demanding environments. It is tailored for companies requiring reliable data management, ensuring efficiency and flexibility in operations.

Percona Server enhances MySQL with numerous features that boost database performance, making it suitable for large-scale deployments. Known for its ability to handle heavy workloads, users count on Percona Server to maintain operational consistency even under significant demand. Its security and compatibility with MySQL are additional benefits, providing a seamless transition for existing MySQL users. Organizations focused on cost-efficiency and high performance often consider Percona Server as a strong, open-source solution.

What are Percona Server's features?

Advanced Scalability: Supports large deployments with ease.
Enhanced Security: Offers improved security measures for data protection.
High Availability: Ensures continuous operation with minimal downtime.
Performance Optimization: Increases efficiency in data processing.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Provides a cost-effective alternative to other database systems.
Reliability: Ensures stable performance for critical database applications.
Community Support: Benefits from a comprehensive and active user community.

In industries such as e-commerce, telecommunication, and finance, Percona Server is implemented to maintain high transaction volumes and ensure robust data security. Its utility in managing complex database demands makes it a preferred choice in sectors where data integrity and performance are crucial.

Percona

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Pricefalls Marketplace, Micpoint, Rent the Runway, Transmart, Wattpad, Singular Group, Invoca, 3E

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg

Percona Server vs. PostgreSQL