Melissa Data Quality vs SAS Data Management comparison

Melissa and SAS are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Melissa is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0, while SAS is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. Melissa holds a 3.4% mindshare in DQ, compared to SAS’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Melissa users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Melissa Data Quality

Read 40 Melissa Data Quality reviews

1,022 Views
623 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SAS Data Management

Read 18 SAS Data Management reviews

2,052 Views
451 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Melissa Data Quality

SAS Data Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

SAS Data Management and Melissa Data Quality compete in the data management and quality sector. Melissa Data Quality is often regarded as superior due to its feature robustness, despite SAS's strong support and pricing.

Features: SAS Data Management provides robust data integration, powerful analytics tools, and strong governance capabilities. Melissa Data Quality focuses on data verification, enrichment, and cleansing, offering advanced data cleansing features.

Room for Improvement: SAS Data Management could enhance user interface intuitiveness, expand cloud compatibility, and streamline complex customization options. Melissa Data Quality could benefit from a wider range of integration options, enhanced real-time processing, and more comprehensive support for international data standards.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Data Management offers comprehensive deployment options with responsive customer support, ensuring a seamless setup process. Melissa Data Quality emphasizes streamlined deployment and efficient customer service, providing ease and quick access to support.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Management involves higher initial costs but offers significant ROI through its broad functionalities. Melissa Data Quality generally has a lower entry cost with quick ROI due to its focused data quality improvements, making it cost-effective for many businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Melissa Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Melissa Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Melissa Data Quality

Ranking in Data Quality

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Scrubbing Software (5th)

SAS Data Management

Ranking in Data Quality

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (28th), Data Governance (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Melissa Data Quality is 3.4%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 3.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Melissa Data Quality	3.4%
SAS Data Management	3.3%
Other	93.3%

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

GaryM

Data Architect at World Vision

SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing

- Scalability is a limitation as it is single threaded. You can bypass this limitation by partitioning your data (say by alphabetic ranges) into multiple dataflows but even within a single dataflow the tool starts to really bog down if you are doing survivorship on a lot of columns. It's just very old technology written that's starting to show its age since it's been fundamentally the same for many years. To stay relavent they will need to replace it with either ADF or SSIS-IR compliant version. - Licensing could be greatly simplified. As soon as a license expires (which is specific to each server) the product stops functioning without prior notice and requires a new license by contacting the vendor. And updating the license is overly complicated. - The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation but that isn't true since pretty much all SSIS components are resizable except theirs! This is just an annoyance but needless impact on productivity when developing new data flows. - The tool needs to provide for incremental matching using the MatchUp for SSIS tool (they provide this for other solutions such as standalone tool and MatchUp web service). We had to code our own incremental logic to work around this. - Tool needs ability to sort mapped columns in the GUI when using advanced survivorship (only allowed when not using column-level survivorship). - It should provide an option for a procedural language (such as C# or VB) for survivor-ship expressions rather than relying on SSIS expression language. - It should provide a more sophisticated ability to concatenate groups of data fields into common blocks of data for advanced survivor-ship prioritization (we do most of this in SQL prior to feeding the data to the tool). - It should provide the ability to only do survivor-ship with no matching (matching is currently required when running data through the tool). - Tool should provide a component similar to BDD to enable the ability to split into multiple thread matches based on data partitions for matching and survivor-ship rather than requiring custom coding a parallel capable solution. We broke down customer data by first letter of last name into ranges of last names so we could run parallel data flows. - Documentation needs to be provided that is specific to MatchUp for SSIS. Most of their wiki pages were written for the web service API MatchUp Object rather than the SSIS component. - They need to update their wiki site documentation as much of it is not kept current. Its also very very basic offering very little in terms of guidelines. For example, the tool is single-threaded so getting great performance requires running multiple parallel data flows or BDD in a data flow which you can figure out on your own but many SSIS practitioners aren't familiar with those techniques. - The tool can hang or crash on rare occasions for unknown reason. Restarting the package resolves the problem. I suspect they have something to do with running on VM (vendor doesn't recommend running on VM) but have no evidence to support it. When it crashes it creates dump file with just vague message saying the executable stopped running.

Read full review

Fernanda Knopki

Data Scientist & Scrum Master at Volvo Group

Has supported centralized data access and improved governance through unified administration

The best features I appreciate about SAS Data Management tool are that it's easy to create the flows and schedule data, and the tables are not too big, making it easy to control the ETL process, including user access which is also easy to manage in SAS. The data integration tools with SAS Data Management were quite good because they allowed me to do all lineage, to manage and see all the variables, find the libraries where the data is, and understand the data in just one tool. Offering another development environment combining code and predefined objects, where I could just drag and drop to achieve what I needed, although some objects were not too good, but some were effective. The metadata management feature of SAS Data Management helps a lot; creating your data marts or data lake with good naming conventions, library conventions, and so on is very important because it allows easy queries to find the whole structure, though I think metadata governance also depends on first definitions, not only on the tool. SAS Data Management is very good for data governance; for me, it was the best tool I worked with in data management, although I don't have too much experience with others, and it truly helped a lot.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have only been using this for about two months, but it has sped up our processing significantly. It makes data mining easy and fast. We don't have to spend an entire month gathering correct information on leads. All we need is a list of home addresses, and in minutes we have names and phone numbers to increase our chance of these leads becoming customers."

"Ability to keep our data set clean and usable for our community searches."

"This tool works better for us than using a batch processing system that we do not have enough control over as each record is being processed."

"Provides simplicity, ease of use, combined with overall accuracy of data."

"We like having the ability to write our own utilities/software to process our records and store the final output the way we want."

"It has a straightforward, easy setup."

"Allows us to delete and correct incorrect data to make the searching of our applicant tracking system more consistent and relevant."

"Our customer database is now significantly more accurate and reliable."

More Melissa Data Quality pros

"In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features."

"The data integration tools with SAS Data Management were quite good because they allowed me to do all lineage, to manage and see all the variables, find the libraries where the data is, and understand the data in just one tool."

"The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful."

"Its robustness is valuable. It is a full-fledged suite. We have a data warehouse model, and there are also a lot of data quality management tools. The repository and all other tools are there. So, it is a full package in terms of reporting tools."

"The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards."

"I find the solution to be very stable."

"If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick."

"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."

More SAS Data Management pros

Cons

"One thing I would want to have, when you're doing a property search, you can do it either on the FIPS in the APN number or the address itself. For some entries, I'll have the APN number, and some I'll have the address. Apparently it cannot process something when both the FIPS-APN and the address are on there. I have to sort, once with one and once with the other, which is a little bit of a pain."

"Needs to validate more addresses accurately."

"One of the problems that we ran into this year was we probably spent over 40 hours finding and trying to drill down to where specific bugs were in the program, which was a tremendous waste of time for us. There were a couple of updates to Windows this year, the program kept crashing. It happened on two different occasions over a period of a few months. Once we told them what the problem was - even though their tech support is great to work with - it literally took probably about two months to fix the issue where we could actually use the program the way we needed to use it."

"We have noticed that some of the emails and addresses return with confusing or incorrect codes, but for the most part, it is accurate."

"The SSIS component setup seems a little klunky."

"The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation however all SSIS components are resizable so that isn't true. This is just an annoyance but needless."

"Many issues, sometimes I have to completely log out and start over."

"If I had multiple Excel files open and ran Listware it would crash Excel, charge the credits, and not save the results."

More Melissa Data Quality cons

"We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive."

"Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement."

"There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage."

"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."

"One problem is accessing the data using a solution other than SAS. The SAS data, which we create in the SAS, cannot be accessed by other tools. We can't open those data in other applications. So we need to have that application in place."

"The solution could use better documentation."

"I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations."

"We implemented it a while ago, and we are trying to improve the data delivery performance. We are looking into how to get faster and automated reporting. We would need better designs and workflows."

More SAS Data Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fully understand your volume, both monthly and annually. Speak with a Melissa account manager, they will put together an effective solution to meet your needs."

"Pricing is very reasonable, no licensing required."

"It is affordable."

"Pricing is very reasonable."

"The price for address validation is similar in all software. However, the price for geocoding decides the actual pricing. If you get their most accurate geocoding (called GeoPoints), then it will add about $10k+ per million requests."

"NCOA address verification was a requirement from USPS to send out the mailers. This was the only option that charged per address which was extremely helpful since we are a small non-profit school."

"The only complaint that I have towards it is they sell licenses based on a range of usage, and I feel those ranges are too large."

"Generally, the cost is ROI positive, depending on your shipping volume."

More Melissa Data Quality pricing and cost advice

"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."

"The solution is expensive."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?

From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?

There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAS Data Management?

The main idea for using SAS Data Management was to bring all data inside SAS. I brought the finance area and the sales area in the company that I have worked, along with some market planning data, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 23% of the time

Experian Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 14% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 10% of the time

Coheris Spad Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 8% of the time

Kroll-Software FuzzyDupes vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 3% of the time

More Melissa Data Quality Competitors

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management

Compared 14% of the time

Collibra Platform vs SAS Data Management

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Data Management

Compared 6% of the time

Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs SAS Data Management

Compared 5% of the time

More SAS Data Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Melissa Data Quality

January 2026

Download Melissa Data Quality product report

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management

January 2026

Download SAS Data Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux

Overview

Data Quality Components for SSIS

This suite of data transformations for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) delivers the full spectrum of data quality including data profiling, data verification, data enrichment and data matching. With an intuitive interface and drag/drop capabilities, this powerful toolkit makes it easy to unify data into a single version of the truth for Master Data Management (MDM) success.

Melissa

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

SAS

Sample Customers

Boeing Co., FedEx, Ford Motor Co, Hewlett Packard, Meade-Johnson, Microsoft, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble, SAAB Cars USA, Sony, Walt Disney, Weight Watchers, and Intel.

Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Melissa Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management

December 2025

Free Report: Melissa Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Melissa Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Melissa Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.