

NGINX Plus and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway compete in the web traffic management category, with NGINX Plus having an edge in performance and versatility, while Azure Application Gateway excels in integration with Azure services.
Features: NGINX Plus is favored for its ability to provide load balancing, reverse proxy, and high performance with minimal resource usage, offering extensive customization and support for microservices architectures. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is known for its integration with Azure services, ease of use, and robust security features like the Web Application Firewall (WAF), making it suitable for large-scale cloud environments.
Room for Improvement: NGINX Plus could improve scalability and pricing, along with better management solutions such as graphical user interfaces; enhancements in clustering and configuration streamlining are also desired. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway needs improvements in flexibility, particularly in network prototyping, with initial deployment complexity and security features also being areas where enhancements are sought, as well as more flexible pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NGINX Plus is highly versatile in hybrid and on-premises deployments, though user support often relies on community resources. Azure Application Gateway shines in public cloud deployments with seamless Azure integration but faces challenges with complex initial setups, and documentation could be improved.
Pricing and ROI: NGINX Plus offers a reasonable price for its features but can be costly when scaling. It provides a good ROI with improved application performance. Azure Application Gateway's usage-based pricing is seen as high compared to competitors, but its integration benefits within Azure provide satisfactory ROI when fully utilized in cloud environments.
If we can use a shared resource, then the return on investment is really nice.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway significantly impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
I would say they provide the best support for Application Gateway because they own the product, so their support is top-notch.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
I would rate Microsoft support as good because they have a very skilled technical support team in the background
Response time is good because they have assigned and dedicated support engineers to us, and we have weekly cadence calls.
It has the autoscaling feature, so there is not much concern around performance; it can scale significantly.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a very scalable product.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a scalable solution.
While some people use NGINX for web servers, my current use case focuses on networking and tunneling, which does not necessitate much scaling.
We have been using it for the past two to three years, and there have been good results with no problems so far.
The stability is good, and except for a few instances, I don't see the non-availability of Azure Cloud services.
I require ninety-nine point nine percent uptime, and NGINX has been pivotal in helping me achieve this along with our other DNS services.
One feature I mentioned is the support for non-HTTPS protocols such as TCP, which could allow one endpoint for all kinds of protocols.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has room for improvement because it offers many features, but its configuration is a bit difficult, at least from the developer point of view.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
NGINX could provide a means to generate self-signed SSL certificates.
As with any application, there were initial issues, however, after receiving support, everything was rectified.
There were some vulnerabilities in F5.
We would prefer to have it cheaper, but it is still expensive.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
When it comes to pricing for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
My use case involves using the free and open-source version of NGINX, making it cost-effective as I haven't incurred any costs.
The solution offers a cost advantage.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats.
We find mutual TLS valuable because we can verify the client securely by setting up the trust certificate of the client, and also if we do it at the client side as well.
For API management, the WebSocket, and the WebServer, NGINX provides a cost advantage, value addition, and effective support.
The web application firewall feature has helped enhance security for our applications because most of the attacks which are performed on our website are being blocked by it.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 5.2% |
| NGINX Plus | 7.3% |
| Other | 87.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers advanced traffic management and security features for web applications. It includes built-in rules, Layer 7 control, autoscaling, and integration options, providing flexibility and security for managing application traffic efficiently.
Azure Application Gateway is utilized by organizations for securing and managing web traffic with its comprehensive web application firewall, load balancing capabilities, and Layer 7 firewall rules. Known for its ease of setup and integration, the platform facilitates external application access and deploys secure services. While it enhances security with customized configurations, users note areas for improvement such as configuration complexity, pricing, third-party tool integration, and automation. Addressing these aspects can improve user experience and performance.
What are the key features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Application Gateway to protect sensitive data and manage significant web traffic. Its application deployment support and security capabilities make it suitable for businesses needing to ensure secure data exchange and reliable access to online services.
NGINX Plus efficiently handles heavy loads with lightweight software and simple configuration. It seamlessly integrates with F5, offering high-performance load balancing and robust reverse proxy capabilities for HTTP, IMAP, POP, and SMTP protocols.
NGINX Plus stands out for its load balancing, authentication, caching, and modular design. Its flexibility and scalability make it ideal for web servers, traffic routing, and enterprise use, supported by comprehensive documentation and a strong community. However, improvements in pricing, graphical interface, and advanced load balancing are desired. Users seek enhanced performance, better security, and simpler configuration. Automation and integration capabilities need attention, and scalability requires further refinement.
What are the key features of NGINX Plus?NGINX Plus is vital for industries deploying reverse proxy, load balancing, and application delivery control. Enterprises utilize it for both cloud and on-premises setups to manage content, secure traffic, and improve application performance. It plays a crucial role in CDN deployments, API management, and microservices architecture by providing enterprise-grade capabilities in caching and traffic management, along with security features like web application firewall and DDoS protection.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.