Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and SonicWall are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Additionally, 80% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Application...

Read 50 Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

8,254 Views
6,438 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

SonicWall Web Application F...

Read 3 SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Application...

SonicWall Web Application F...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva, Radware, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).

To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Application...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (13th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (9th)

SonicWall Web Application F...

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer5599486

Cloud Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Mutual TLS has secured our web services and now needs broader protocol support

The most valuable feature we have found in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is mutual TLS. We find mutual TLS valuable because we can verify the client securely by setting up the trust certificate of the client, and also if we do it at the client side as well. This successfully develops mutual trust, ensuring that we know the client who is calling our service is a legitimate client. That is a very nice feature.Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has helped manage our traffic efficiently because we have many web services that we can put behind the same URL, and we can have different URLs with the same Application Gateway with a limited number of listeners. We can do host-based routing as well as URL-based routing or path-based routing. It supports both, so we can have even a single URL supporting many applications, or we can have different URLs for different applications respectively. We have both use cases.

Read full review

Narender Reddy

IT Manager at iLenSys Technologies Pvt Ltd

A stable and durable solution that can be used for security and tunneling

We use SonicWall Web Application Firewall for security and tunneling We should get the logs from the solution, and it should communicate with the local DNS. There is some lag in the solution's technical support response time. I have been using SonicWall Web Application Firewall for one year.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The production is a valuable feature."

"The tool is easy to use and quite flexible. It has policy management features as well. The solution screens all traffic to our web applications before passing it to the application. We recently tested it on one of our poorly developed applications, and the upgrade gave us a 100% result based on our tests. It's very effective as a security measure, and people can detect threats even through the web application."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the web application firewall (WAF)."

"The health probe is pretty good for your backend health. It tells you whether it's communicating and talking to the endpoint correctly. It is quite useful."

"I like the tool's stability and performance."

"Using policies to link and manage these URL-based routing configurations is also valuable."

"The solution provides great automation and it is easy to upgrade service."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pros

"The solution is more advanced and efficient than its competitors such as Meraki."

"Capture ATP is a good additional feature in the latest version."

"We use SonicWall Web Application Firewall for security and tunneling."

"The solution offers better data protection than competitors."

"SonicWall Web Application Firewall is very smooth and cool, and a very user-friendly firewall."

Cons

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is harder to manage than Imperva. It is not intuitive and stable compared to other products."

"The main drawback of the solution is that it's only for Azure."

"The support that they provide could be faster."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is not scalable."

"The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"The monitoring on the solution could be better."

"We got the feeling that this product wasn't stable or good enough for us."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway cons

"The latest version needs a lot of work because it's not yet as stable as the previous versions. We're getting a lot of unknown errors popping up."

"The solution needs an access management feature with API integration so we can assign certain levels of access within groups."

"We should get the logs from the solution, and it should communicate with the local DNS."

"We have a lot of unknown errors popping up in the latest version."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution can be reduced a bit."

"There is a need to pay a fixed price per month to use the product. There are no additional payments to be made to Microsoft apart from the charges paid towards the monthly licensing costs attached to the solution."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has less price than other application gateway solutions."

"It is not expensive."

"The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."

"Between v1 and v2, there is a lot of change in the pricing. It is very costly compared to AWS."

"There is some additional cost, such as extended support."

"The cost is not an issue."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...

See all answers

How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Regarding the pricing and licensing of Application Gateway, it is not cheap because the version we are using is WAF V2, and we are also using DDoS Premium Protection. I think the price of WAF on Ap...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 5% of the time

NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 5% of the time

Sucuri vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Competitors

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 61% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 39% of the time

More SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

October 2026

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report

Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

October 2026

SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] report

Download SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers advanced traffic management and security features for web applications. It includes built-in rules, Layer 7 control, autoscaling, and integration options, providing flexibility and security for managing application traffic efficiently.

Azure Application Gateway is utilized by organizations for securing and managing web traffic with its comprehensive web application firewall, load balancing capabilities, and Layer 7 firewall rules. Known for its ease of setup and integration, the platform facilitates external application access and deploys secure services. While it enhances security with customized configurations, users note areas for improvement such as configuration complexity, pricing, third-party tool integration, and automation. Addressing these aspects can improve user experience and performance.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Built-in Rules: Pre-configured rules help streamline traffic management and enhance security.
Layer 7 Control: Offers detailed traffic routing and policies based on application-level information.
Real-Time Autoscaling: Automatically adjusts resources to meet demand and optimize performance.
Comprehensive WAF Protection: Guards against web vulnerabilities and potential threats.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Azure services for enhanced workflow efficiency.

What benefits do users look for in reviews?

Traffic Routing: Efficiently directs application traffic based on defined rules for improved performance.
Security: Provides robust protection for internet-facing applications.
Ease of Setup: Simplifies deployment and management of applications.
Flexibility: Supports different application scenarios with customizable configurations.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Application Gateway to protect sensitive data and manage significant web traffic. Its application deployment support and security capabilities make it suitable for businesses needing to ensure secure data exchange and reliable access to online services.

Microsoft

The SonicWall Web Application Firewal l (WAF) solutions enables the defense-in-depth strategy to protect your web applications running in a private, public or hybrid cloud environment. compromise the application, steal data and/or cause a denial-of-service.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell

AMANZIMTOTI HIGH SCHOOL

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva, Radware, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.