Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] comparison

Cloudflare and SonicWall are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Additionally, 95% of Cloudflare users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.
Cloudflare Web Application ...
Read 25 Cloudflare Web Application Firewall reviews
  • 4,339 Views
  • 4,339 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, F5, Imperva and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Web Application ...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (7th)
SonicWall Web Application F...
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AU
Avinash Udawant
IT Manager at Amla Commerce
Effectively protects clients from automated threats and ensures global security
I cannot say much about areas of improvement for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall because I haven't gone through deep understanding of it, as I am still learning. However, they need to improve their support because getting a response for basic requests took around 48 hours, which is too long. If I took 48 hours to answer a request at my company, it would be a tough time to see or address the issue, and it would be frustrating.
Read full review
Narender Reddy - PeerSpot reviewer
Narender Reddy
IT Manager at iLenSys Technologies Pvt Ltd
A stable and durable solution that can be used for security and tunneling
We use SonicWall Web Application Firewall for security and tunneling We should get the logs from the solution, and it should communicate with the local DNS. There is some lag in the solution's technical support response time. I have been using SonicWall Web Application Firewall for one year.…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution protects our application, which runs on the HTTP protocol, from DDoS attacks."
"The security features are valuable. The particular feature we use is called OWASP."
"I'm highly satisfied. It's remarkably user-friendly, enabling me to quickly identify issues, and deploy solutions, and it offers the necessary features."
"It protects web applications efficiently."
"Cloudflare WAF provides protection through rules and functionalities like Cloudflare's SDRAP."
"Cloudflare is cheaper compared to Azure WAF, which I have considered before."
"Technical support has a very fast response time and they are helpful."
"The rate limiting features and customizations in terms of URL match and applying policies are valuable to me."
More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pros
"We use SonicWall Web Application Firewall for security and tunneling."
"Capture ATP is a good additional feature in the latest version."
"The solution offers better data protection than competitors."
 

Cons

"The product can improve by having more multitenancy capability, which is currently not available."
"The notification part could be improved. It's very much connected to Web Application Firewall, rate-limiting, and DDoS protection."
"Its stability could be better."
"They have some limitations with third-party integrations."
"The product can improve by having more multitenancy capability, which is currently not available."
"It would be ideal if the solution offered better log integration and more integration with different platforms."
"The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement."
"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."
More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall cons
"The solution needs an access management feature with API integration so we can assign certain levels of access within groups."
"We have a lot of unknown errors popping up in the latest version."
"We should get the logs from the solution, and it should communicate with the local DNS."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."
"The solution is expensive."
"We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
"It starts at $20 and can easily go up to $200 monthly"
"It is not too pricey."
"Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."
"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."
"The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."
More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pricing and cost advice
"The pricing is competitive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?
The price of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?
I don't really use the rule-based logic feature or utilize the WAF's ability to scale as a cloud-based service. I don't have specific areas that could be improved with Cloudflare Web Application Fi...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?
I'm using Cloudflare Web Application Firewall on all my domains and any client domains I have; I set them up with a Cloudflare account. I have clients in pretty much every industry, including indiv...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 10% of the time
F5 Advanced WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 6% of the time
Azure Web Application Firewall vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 6% of the time
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 6% of the time
Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Compared 6% of the time
More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
January 2026
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall reportDownload Cloudflare Web Application Firewall product report
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
January 2026
SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] reportDownload SonicWall Web Application Firewall [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Cloudflare WAF
No data available
 

Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

Cloudflare

The SonicWall Web Application Firewal l (WAF) solutions enables the defense-in-depth strategy to protect your web applications running in a private, public or hybrid cloud environment. compromise the application, steal data and/or cause a denial-of-service.

SonicWall
 

Sample Customers

crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
AMANZIMTOTI HIGH SCHOOL
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, F5, Imperva and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.