Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Microsoft and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Virtuozzo is ranked #23. Microsoft holds a 15.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure

Read 323 Microsoft Azure reviews

19,268 Views
11,175 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews

749 Views
652 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Virtuozzo Application Platform are cloud solutions that compete in the cloud computing market. Microsoft Azure is often seen as leading due to its extensive service range and global support network.

Features: Microsoft Azure includes comprehensive services such as AI, machine learning, and analytics, and integrates with the Microsoft ecosystem. Virtuozzo Application Platform focuses on container management, orchestration, and scalability for cloud-native applications. Azure's broader range contrasts with Virtuozzo's developer-centric optimizations.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance user interface simplicity and reduce complexity in deployment processes. Its pricing model might benefit from more transparency and flexibility. Azure's steep learning curve could also be addressed. Virtuozzo Application Platform may improve its global reach and expand its service offerings. Enhancements in customer support responsiveness and scalability options would also be beneficial for Virtuozzo.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure offers seamless integration with existing enterprise infrastructures and provides comprehensive global support. Virtuozzo Application Platform ensures simplicity and rapid deployment in cloud-native environments, aiding developers in focusing on app support.

Pricing and ROI: Azure's pricing might be on the higher side due to its extensive offerings, but returns are substantial through service integration. Virtuozzo has affordable setup costs, providing favorable ROI, especially for businesses with app development and scalability as their primary focus.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

323

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

23rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 15.2%, down from 20.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure	15.2%
Virtuozzo Application Platform	1.4%
Other	83.4%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience

For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.

Read full review

Miguel Maloney Thompson

IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees

A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup

It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I come from the DBA side so for me it's the easy maintenance; backups are very easy as well."

"Much more intuitive and more visual than AWS. More obvious where things are and how to change their configurations, etc."

"We use the cognitive service, virtual machines, and customer DB. Microsoft Azure is also scalable and easy to install."

"Its resiliency is most valuable. It is also a very scalable solution, so you can spend the resources on demand."

"The most valuable features are the interface and customizability."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the value for money and flexibility."

"The solution is very stable for Windows setups."

"I think the most useful feature has been the remote desktop. It has been very helpful when customers have old applications that are not architected to run remotely."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."

"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."

"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."

"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."

"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."

Cons

"The process by which our customers can switch from one subscription to another should be simplified."

"You eventually end up with a large collection of 'bits' all working together, I find it hard to be able to create a logical 'box' and put all the 'bits' that need to be in that box / application into the one place."

"Integration with more platforms needs improvement."

"It should have a better hybrid-cloud central analysis. Their support service also needs to be improved. Our main concern is support calls. Our issue is basically related to the technical functionality of the services that we use. It doesn't behave as expected, and support often fails to solve the problem."

"The initial setup is quite complex because of the number of options that are available."

"The solution should improve the shared cache. For the shared cache, Microsoft uses RADIUS third-party services. We have a lot of trouble with RADIUS and I suppose that is due to the fact that is not owned completely by Microsoft."

"If the price were reduced then it would be an improvement."

"Pricing is one area where Azure has room for improvement. There should be some due consideration. Azure has solved some issues with pricing from the development team's standpoint, but it is still quite costly. They should also offer a trial period for the individual platform solutions. I think that would be pretty handy for the developers."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."

"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."

"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."

"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution could be reduced. We are not able to create a free account in my country."

"Pricing of Microsoft Azure services depends on the build of what you prepare to deploy."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The solution does not offer very many free services which can become expensive. We are on an annual license."

"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"The pricing is fair and it was actually just reduced. My organization is paying approximately $100,000 annually with close to one thousand users. There are no additional fees."

"We have an annual license subscription to use the solution."

"I would like to see it more easily accessible."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."

"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	140
Midsize Enterprise	53
Large Enterprise	150

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Engine Yard Cloud vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Heroku vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 10% of the time

More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

January 2026

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

January 2026

Download Virtuozzo Application Platform product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

Jelastic

Overview

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?

Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.

What benefits should users expect from Azure?

Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

Your Platform as a Service solution for DevOps hosting!

An elastic, high performance PaaS solution for cloud and hosting providers. The easy way to sell cloud hosting to DevOps-focused SaaS companies.

Turnkey application hosting for DevOps.

Sell PaaS alongside your existing products. The Virtuozzo Application Platform runs on the infrastructure you have today – even virtualized in your cloud or hosting platform.

It makes DevOps hosting fast, easy and cost-effective – and with true consumption-based billing, it gives you a real competitive advantage over hyperscale clouds.

Platform as a Service opens up new markets for your business: you can sell hosting to any company that depends on DevOps for internal or customer-facing IT.

Virtuozzo

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

February 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.