Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Microsoft and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Virtuozzo is ranked #22. Microsoft holds a 12.4% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure

Read 324 Microsoft Azure reviews

28,777 Views
15,827 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews

1,327 Views
1,115 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Virtuozzo Application Platform are cloud solutions that compete in the cloud computing market. Microsoft Azure is often seen as leading due to its extensive service range and global support network.

Features: Microsoft Azure includes comprehensive services such as AI, machine learning, and analytics, and integrates with the Microsoft ecosystem. Virtuozzo Application Platform focuses on container management, orchestration, and scalability for cloud-native applications. Azure's broader range contrasts with Virtuozzo's developer-centric optimizations.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance user interface simplicity and reduce complexity in deployment processes. Its pricing model might benefit from more transparency and flexibility. Azure's steep learning curve could also be addressed. Virtuozzo Application Platform may improve its global reach and expand its service offerings. Enhancements in customer support responsiveness and scalability options would also be beneficial for Virtuozzo.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure offers seamless integration with existing enterprise infrastructures and provides comprehensive global support. Virtuozzo Application Platform ensures simplicity and rapid deployment in cloud-native environments, aiding developers in focusing on app support.

Pricing and ROI: Azure's pricing might be on the higher side due to its extensive offerings, but returns are substantial through service integration. Virtuozzo has affordable setup costs, providing favorable ROI, especially for businesses with app development and scalability as their primary focus.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

324

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

22nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 12.4%, down from 19.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure	12.4%
Virtuozzo Application Platform	1.7%
Other	85.9%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience

For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.

Read full review

Miguel Maloney Thompson

IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees

A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup

It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support has been good overall, they are helpful and responsive, and we are satisfied with the level of service we receive."

"Microsoft does provide good support and enables our customers to obtain the results they need."

"The system is more secure, and this is valuable."

"The most important thing is we don't have to maintain any physical infrastructure. With typical conventional on-premise solutions, we have to maintain many things like the hardware, clusters, etc. With this cloud platform, you don't have to worry about all those things. We have the service always available, and this is the main advantage. I like that we use everything on our standard Active Directory on on-premises on Azure. The key advantage is that you can have the sole indication based on the cloud. This isn't possible with an on-premise Active Directory. This enables work from home and at the office because it's on the cloud."

"I think Azure's level of automation to achieve efficiency or agility is valuable. I also like the change capability cadence, the showback capabilities, and understanding what our costs are."

"It is easy to deploy."

"The organization can focus more on real business problems instead of IT problems, reduce the time spent setting up the infrastructure, and become more agile and, in many cases, more reliable by using the public cloud."

"I like the familiarity of this solution."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"The technical support is extremely helpful, and they have a very good support team."

"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."

"We almost don't have to maintain our servers."

"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."

"As a strategic solution, it's really good because it will avoid a lot of cost if you are building your data center, for example, or from scratch."

"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."

"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."

"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."

More Virtuozzo Application Platform pros

Cons

"Pricing is high if you plan to use it on a larger scale."

"We'd prefer lower pricing. Microsoft can be costly."

"The quality of some components of Microsoft Azure is not that great. For example, Microsoft has not fixed issues in Microsoft Teams for many years. There are well-known issues that are submitted by customers two years ago and they still are not fixed."

"There was a time when the solution was updated on their side and all of our functions stopped working. This issue could be worked on to prevent it from happening in the future. They must give us the information of when they are going to updates on the platform side so that we can take the appropriate measures on our side as well."

"The solution should improve the shared cache. For the shared cache, Microsoft uses RADIUS third-party services. We have a lot of trouble with RADIUS and I suppose that is due to the fact that is not owned completely by Microsoft."

"Microsoft Azure could improve by having more virtual machine operating systems available."

"Technical support needs to be better."

"We work with Azure, which is okay, but very clunky and complex."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."

"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."

"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

"I would like to see better integration into enterprise storage products."

"An S3 like storage system, if they have a s3 API compatible system I can move my files from AWS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The monthly costs become very reasonable because of the discounts you get on longer reserved instances."

"The cost of the solution could be reduced. However, I am using the free version."

"It is operational expenditure (OPEX). There is no cost upfront. When you start using it, you have to pay the charges. Initially, the cost is less, but after you start using it more and more, the cost will go higher. It is a little bit costly, but that is okay because you get better resources. You also get better support in terms of how you create the resources. Documentation is available, and the SLAs are met."

"The current pricing is on a pay-as-you-go subscription."

"Everything involves an annual commitment with a monthly charge."

"We pay our bill in a monthly or 6 monthly billing cycle. The cost depends on how much you use during the period."

"Several thousand dollars and counting, we haven't needed to upgrade on premises hardware (In fact we eliminated all of the old on-premises hardware and run 100% on Azure) or pay for it's maintenance, power etc."

"The long-term cost is higher than if you set up the servers on-premises, which is something that could be improved through more competitive pricing."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."

"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	141
Midsize Enterprise	54
Large Enterprise	153

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Heroku vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Engine Yard Cloud vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

June 2026

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

May 2026

Download Virtuozzo Application Platform product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

Jelastic

Overview

Microsoft Azure is a versatile cloud platform known for its scalability, flexibility, and ease of use, offering comprehensive solutions like virtual machines, identity management, and data storage with robust security measures and global data centers.

Azure provides a straightforward setup with dynamic scaling and seamless integration with existing tools. Its robust security, compliance with privacy laws, and global data center presence make it a trusted choice for enterprises. With features supporting DevOps, IoT, AI/ML, and hybrid cloud environments, Azure facilitates efficient cloud migration and modernization, enhancing operational efficiency.

What are some of the key features of Microsoft Azure?

Scalability: Adjust resources automatically to meet demand.
Flexibility: Support for hybrid cloud setup and smooth integration with existing tools.
Virtual Machines: Extensive support for VMs to run various workloads.
Active Directory: Robust identity and access management services.
Data Storage: Diverse storage options for different data management needs.
Security Measures: Comprehensive security protocols and compliance support.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Microsoft Azure?

Cost Efficiency: Managed services that reduce operational costs.
Reliability: High availability with global data center coverage.
Ease of Migration: Facilitates transition from on-premises solutions to the cloud.
Operational Efficiency: User-friendly interface and extensive training resources.

Organizations primarily use Azure for infrastructure services, application hosting, and data management across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. Resellers deploy cloud services for clients in private, public, and hybrid clouds, supporting enterprise applications and digital transformation projects.

Microsoft

Virtuozzo Application Platform offers a comprehensive PaaS solution enabling dynamic auto-scaling and efficient resource management, focusing on code stability and ease of use.

Virtuozzo Application Platform provides horizontal and vertical scaling without requiring code changes, ensuring developers can prioritize code optimization. It features advanced Docker hosting and convenient one-click deployments. With a flexible pricing model, it's designed for straightforward, controlled usage with a focus on scalability and manageability.

What are Virtuozzo Application Platform's important features?

Auto-Scaling: Enables horizontal and vertical scaling without altering code.
Docker Hosting: Supports advanced Docker environments.
One-Click Deployment: Simplifies the application deployment process.
Billing Model: Offers usage-based billing for cost efficiency.
Dynamic Vertical Scaling: Provides granular resource assignment.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Scalability: Easily scales to meet demand without additional code changes.
Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with pay-per-use.
User-Friendly: Ensures easy setup with no steep learning curve.

Organizations leverage Virtuozzo Application Platform for PaaS reselling and management, hosting it on public clouds for flexibility. It's favored by managed service providers for supporting environments ranging from static applications to governmental projects. Those involved include management, system engineers, and developers, who appreciate its fault tolerance and high availability in deployment scenarios.

Virtuozzo

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

June 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.