Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs Oracle Beehive comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Content Collaboration Platforms category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #26. Microsoft holds a 4.7% mindshare in CCP, compared to Oracle’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Office SharePoint...
Read 38 Microsoft Office SharePoint Server reviews
  • 1,278 Views
  • 1,099 Comparison Views
82% willing to recommend
Oracle Beehive
Read 2 Oracle Beehive reviews
  • 217 Views
  • 76 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Oracle Beehive and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server compete in the enterprise collaboration solutions category. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server often has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, which outweighs its higher pricing.

Features: Oracle Beehive offers tools like integrated email, calendar, and conference features for seamless team interaction. SharePoint Server provides document management, workflow automation, and integration capabilities with other Microsoft products, making it a comprehensive choice.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Beehive has a straightforward deployment process with flexible options for diverse IT environments. SharePoint Server involves a more complex setup requiring specific technical expertise but provides extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Beehive generally has a lower initial setup cost, which is appealing for budget-conscious enterprises. SharePoint Server, while having higher initial costs, often yields higher ROI due to its rich feature set, providing long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Office SharePoint...
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
4.2
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Beehive
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
26th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is 4.7%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Beehive is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Content Collaboration Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server4.7%
Oracle Beehive0.5%
Other94.8%
Content Collaboration Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Daniel Giacomelli - PeerSpot reviewer
Has transformed how I manage documents through metadata and automation while enabling structured collaboration
Microsoft should restore some functionalities from older versions of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2003 and 2010. Specifically, bringing back something similar to SharePoint Designer would be beneficial. SharePoint Designer was both advantageous and challenging - developers found it limiting and preferred Visual Studio, while non-developers struggled to use it effectively. A new tool for configuring webpage design and development for content pages would be valuable. The current system is too basic. While integration of filtered lists and libraries is possible, it requires knowledge of Python or jQuery. A WYSIWYG editor would be preferable to requiring programming knowledge or Visual Studio.
Read full review
it_user1127034 - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an excellent Database Management System and high level of services, performance, and availability
We will need to implement prototypes in our data warehouse. We will have to implement and to support some different types of files like video, audio, pictures, and non-structured data. So we are working on that. We would like better integration for data security. We will have many partners, eight or nine external partners. We will still use our system to upgrade our warehouse. But with many partners, the data warehouse will not be unique. It will be a distributed data platform. So we would need and we are looking for many services to better manage the integrity and the use of all of the data. We are receiving all these data from trains and trucks that are working on the highways and on the roads. We will have to implement some facilities to adequately use all this data at a really high volume coming from IoT. So we are not choosing that and we will have to implement some services. Right now, we don't have any monitoring. We do have major density and access control, but when a user is in our environment, we do not have the services to really measure what he is doing. I will have to report in three months on the project and its evolution. I don't have the financials and the best practices regarding the financial models with costs and benefits for a major data platform with many partners. We will know what it will cost, but we will have to define some benefits because when I will be at the treasury board asking for a major project, they will ask me what would the benefits from that will be. I'm doing research into best practices. I know that the U.S. government has a platform like the one we want to build. It is a bigger one, from what I understand. I think that the state of California and maybe the state of New York has the type of platform we want to put in place. I would like to present more than just an article. I would like to have a reference model, to really be on target by showing the benefits that are possible down the road.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The implementation and configuring of the resolution are very easy in the online version."
"What I appreciate most about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is how it centralizes information and collaboration in one place."
"It's a very robust product."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very usable. I can navigate it, I can have a media call, I can have a call with my project team, so we can chat with every team kind of like WhatsApp. Any time there are projects or other things, we can chat in a secure way. It's automation-specific secure."
"The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps."
"The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part."
"Ability to collaborate with others in one location."
"The features for low-code and no-code capabilities in Microsoft Office SharePoint Server are among the best, which are very user-friendly and not seen in any other cloud services, such as S3 from AWS and blob storage from Azure."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server pros
"We have really high level of services, performance, availability, and it is stable. Everything works together really well."
"This solution has automated protection from downtime. High-availability is built into every component, and the backups are completely automated."
 

Cons

"I would rate my experience with Microsoft technical support as sometimes frustrating because of the time it takes for the Microsoft team to react to their particular case."
"The document management features of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server are not very good compared to OneDrive."
"The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration."
"The solution is like a CRM, so the initial setup is complex. It takes a few days to deploy the solution and the length of time depends on how large the company's topology is and what the client's demands are."
"The solution needs to be more collaborative. I believe they are just coming up with the themes for this right now."
"The product is behind in development and lacks some features."
"The solution needs to enable better sharing capabilities between users and external users. Several users also have problems with linking their emails to their Microsoft account."
"The GUI is outdated."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server cons
"The price of licenses is high and should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."
"One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."
"It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."
"There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise15
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?
The price of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is affordable for us.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?
There are areas that could be improved with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server. My company has more than 5,000 collaborators. The question of how Microsoft Office SharePoint Server can be a better ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?
The regular use cases with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server are to share files and to plug them into websites in collaboration features from Office 365. The advanced search functionality is accep...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Amazon WorkDocs vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Logo
Amazon WorkDocs vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
Compared 64% of the time
Datto Workplace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Logo
Datto Workplace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
Compared 16% of the time
Hitachi Content Platform Anywhere vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Logo
Hitachi Content Platform Anywhere vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
Compared 11% of the time
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
September 2025
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server reportDownload Microsoft Office SharePoint Server product report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
September 2025
Oracle Beehive reportDownload Oracle Beehive product report
 

Also Known As

Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server
Beehive
 

Overview

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

Microsoft

Oracle Beehive provides an integrated set of communication and collaboration services built on a single scalable, secure, enterprise-class platform. Beehive allows users to access their collaborative information through familiar tools while enabling IT to consolidate infrastructure and implement a centrally managed, secure, and compliant collaboration environment built on Oracle technology.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy
Oracle
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive
September 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive report.
See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.