Kiteworks vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server comparison

Kiteworks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Content Collaboration Platforms category. Kiteworks is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #7. Kiteworks holds a 2.6% mindshare in CCP, compared to Microsoft’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

2,765 Views
304 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Read 29 Microsoft Office SharePoint Server reviews

1,409 Views
1,240 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Kiteworks and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server both compete in document management and collaboration. Kiteworks often has the upper hand due to its pricing and customer service, while SharePoint's comprehensive features make it strong in enterprise settings.

Features: Kiteworks focuses on secure file sharing, regulatory compliance, and audit tracking, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing security. SharePoint provides extensive document management, version control, and integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, offering a robust platform for large-scale enterprise collaboration. The main difference lies in Kiteworks' security focus versus SharePoint's integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance its integration capabilities with other platforms and expand its feature set for enterprise environments. It might also benefit from more advanced workflow automation features. SharePoint could address its user interface complexity and improve mobile accessibility. Additionally, simplifying its deployment process could benefit users facing challenges with infrastructure requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks is preferred for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, ensuring a smooth setup for businesses focused on data security. SharePoint's deployment can be challenging due to its intricate infrastructure, but it compensates with extensive documentation and a robust support network, useful for enterprises with complex needs.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks offers competitive pricing with a cost-benefit advantage due to lower setup investments and faster deployment, delivering a quicker ROI. SharePoint has higher initial costs, but these are balanced by integration and feature expansion, which provide substantial long-term ROI for enterprises needing extensive customization. Kiteworks is cost-effective, contrasting with SharePoint's focus on enterprise scalability investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (15th), Email Security (32nd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (6th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (11th)

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 2.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is 6.3%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Content Collaboration Platforms

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at Wipro Limited

Two-factor authentication and .ZIP format make large file transfers very secure

The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth. Also, only the .ZIP format is supported because it is a very secure mode of file transfer, and that is why it is recommended. It also has built-in antivirus, so if it detects any malware it will quarantine the file and it won't be delivered. This is really important to keep the service up and running in a proper and secure manner. With people working from home, the data needs to be checked to see what kind of data is being sent. It has a two-factor authentication mechanism. For example, if a person with a particular domain is using Kiteworks and sends a file to a party outside of his domain, that external party has to go through two-factor authentication. The receiver gets a link that takes them to the setup of a temporary account, which will be valid for three days. The recipient will also receive a customized password separately. Only after all these steps will they be able to access the file. That access is only available to a person with the mail ID to which the file was sent. In addition, admins can see who is sending sensitive content, what that content is, and to whom it is being sent, and can track emails. One week of good training will give a user complete knowledge for using the solution. The system is very easy to use. You just click on "Compose," attach a file, and send it. It's very easy compared to Outlook or Teams. It's quite simple, even for someone logging in for the first time. It is very smooth and easy to send files.

Read full review

Jaufre Rouanet

Partner and CEO at JRC CORPORATE CONSULTING

Integration enhances workflow while user support requires improvement

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server should add some 'tip of the days' and small videos to help users grow within their experience with SharePoint. More integration with Copilot and with the AI platform would be great. Additionally, having the ability in Microsoft Office SharePoint Server to summarize when bringing in SharePoint folders would be beneficial, providing extracts, analysis, proposals, and summaries of those documents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"We can see when people are sending things. We can definitely see who is sending to whom. From the administrative logs, we can see who is sending to an outside entity, and those logs are retained for quite a while."

More Kiteworks pros

"The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps."

"The implementation and configuring of the resolution are very easy in the online version."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it doesn't require coding. You just need to configure it. You don't need to code before getting something running. It makes it very fast."

"The solution is scalable. You can do both horizontal and vertical scaling."

"The most valuable feature is that it is very usable. I can navigate it, I can have a media call, I can have a call with my project team, so we can chat with every team kind of like WhatsApp. Any time there are projects or other things, we can chat in a secure way. It's automation-specific secure."

"The level of stability is good."

"It's a very robust product."

"Document management and records management features are the most valuable."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server pros

Cons

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

More Kiteworks cons

"The ability to preview files in different formats should be expanded to include formats such as embedded postscript (EPS), AutoCAD, and Adobe Acrobat PDF."

"Workflows could be simplified."

"The solution needs to enable better sharing capabilities between users and external users. Several users also have problems with linking their emails to their Microsoft account."

"The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration."

"The permission management features need improvement."

"The user interface needs improvement because there is a lot of stuff in there. I use five to eight navigation buttons. It should be more user-friendly. Frequently used menu items should be arranged in a proper way. That would be helpful."

"The solution needs to be more collaborative. I believe they are just coming up with the themes for this right now."

"The GUI is outdated."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."

"One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."

"There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."

"It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiteworks?

The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 39% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 9% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

Mimecast Email Security vs Kiteworks

Compared 2% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Amazon WorkDocs vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 73% of the time

Datto Workplace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 18% of the time

Flock vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

July 2025

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

June 2025

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server report

Download Microsoft Office SharePoint Server product report

Also Known As

Accellion

Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

June 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server report.

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.