Kiteworks vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server comparison

Kiteworks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Content Collaboration Platforms category. Kiteworks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. Kiteworks holds a 2.4% mindshare in CCP, compared to Microsoft’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

2,796 Views
336 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Read 38 Microsoft Office SharePoint Server reviews

1,278 Views
1,099 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Kiteworks and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server both compete in document management and collaboration. Kiteworks often has the upper hand due to its pricing and customer service, while SharePoint's comprehensive features make it strong in enterprise settings.

Features: Kiteworks focuses on secure file sharing, regulatory compliance, and audit tracking, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing security. SharePoint provides extensive document management, version control, and integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, offering a robust platform for large-scale enterprise collaboration. The main difference lies in Kiteworks' security focus versus SharePoint's integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance its integration capabilities with other platforms and expand its feature set for enterprise environments. It might also benefit from more advanced workflow automation features. SharePoint could address its user interface complexity and improve mobile accessibility. Additionally, simplifying its deployment process could benefit users facing challenges with infrastructure requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks is preferred for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, ensuring a smooth setup for businesses focused on data security. SharePoint's deployment can be challenging due to its intricate infrastructure, but it compensates with extensive documentation and a robust support network, useful for enterprises with complex needs.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks offers competitive pricing with a cost-benefit advantage due to lower setup investments and faster deployment, delivering a quicker ROI. SharePoint has higher initial costs, but these are balanced by integration and feature expansion, which provide substantial long-term ROI for enterprises needing extensive customization. Kiteworks is cost-effective, contrasting with SharePoint's focus on enterprise scalability investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Email Security (32nd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (11th)

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is 4.7%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Content Collaboration Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server	4.7%
Kiteworks	2.4%
Other	92.9%

Content Collaboration Platforms

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at Wipro Limited

Two-factor authentication and .ZIP format make large file transfers very secure

The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth. Also, only the .ZIP format is supported because it is a very secure mode of file transfer, and that is why it is recommended. It also has built-in antivirus, so if it detects any malware it will quarantine the file and it won't be delivered. This is really important to keep the service up and running in a proper and secure manner. With people working from home, the data needs to be checked to see what kind of data is being sent. It has a two-factor authentication mechanism. For example, if a person with a particular domain is using Kiteworks and sends a file to a party outside of his domain, that external party has to go through two-factor authentication. The receiver gets a link that takes them to the setup of a temporary account, which will be valid for three days. The recipient will also receive a customized password separately. Only after all these steps will they be able to access the file. That access is only available to a person with the mail ID to which the file was sent. In addition, admins can see who is sending sensitive content, what that content is, and to whom it is being sent, and can track emails. One week of good training will give a user complete knowledge for using the solution. The system is very easy to use. You just click on "Compose," attach a file, and send it. It's very easy compared to Outlook or Teams. It's quite simple, even for someone logging in for the first time. It is very smooth and easy to send files.

Read full review

Daniel Giacomelli

Security and Compliance at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has transformed how I manage documents through metadata and automation while enabling structured collaboration

Microsoft should restore some functionalities from older versions of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2003 and 2010. Specifically, bringing back something similar to SharePoint Designer would be beneficial. SharePoint Designer was both advantageous and challenging - developers found it limiting and preferred Visual Studio, while non-developers struggled to use it effectively. A new tool for configuring webpage design and development for content pages would be valuable. The current system is too basic. While integration of filtered lists and libraries is possible, it requires knowledge of Python or jQuery. A WYSIWYG editor would be preferable to requiring programming knowledge or Visual Studio.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"The solution can be used remotely; it's easy to upload and share files."

More Kiteworks pros

"The most valuable feature is that it is very usable. I can navigate it, I can have a media call, I can have a call with my project team, so we can chat with every team kind of like WhatsApp. Any time there are projects or other things, we can chat in a secure way. It's automation-specific secure."

"Sharing information is the best feature or advantage of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server based on my experience."

"The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Communication Site."

"The level of stability is good."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it doesn't require coding. You just need to configure it. You don't need to code before getting something running. It makes it very fast."

"The features for low-code and no-code capabilities in Microsoft Office SharePoint Server are among the best, which are very user-friendly and not seen in any other cloud services, such as S3 from AWS and blob storage from Azure."

"The solution's most valuable features is its document management. It allows sharing with external users and integrates well with Office apps and Microsoft Flow."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server pros

Cons

"File location could be improved."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

More Kiteworks cons

"I think these tools do a pretty good job. There is only one area of improvement. Maybe Microsoft can invest a little bit more into the ease at which integration can be done with other third party applications."

"Many of our customers would like to see an OCR feature, so it would be very good to have this in a future release."

"It is a bit restrictive to develop in the cloud version. A lot of features are in the cloud now, and you have to develop on the outside. As far as the platform and the programming side of things are concerned, it is moving more towards configuration management rather than programming. When we are doing solutions, we are basically just configuring it to make solutions happen rather than actually using the Visual Studio code and developing from scratch in the cloud. It is almost like creating an app. You have created an app for your phone, but the app doesn't really sit on your phone. It sits somewhere on a server, and the database sits on another server. The app is just pulling and pushing information. The whole development has changed. We used to install things directly on the server and then run the application from the server. Now, it is more of a modular architecture."

"The document management features of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server are not very good compared to OneDrive."

"Workflows could be simplified."

"The solution needs to have more flexibility. The classic version had more flexibility, however, the modern version has many more limitations."

"Making it more intuitive could help teams adopt it faster and use it more effectively by being more user-friendly."

"The solution needs to enable better sharing capabilities between users and external users. Several users also have problems with linking their emails to their Microsoft account."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."

"It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."

"One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."

"There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?

The price of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is affordable for us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?

There are areas that could be improved with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server. My company has more than 5,000 collaborators. The question of how Microsoft Office SharePoint Server can be a better ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?

The regular use cases with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server are to share files and to plug them into websites in collaboration features from Office 365. The advanced search functionality is accep...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 35% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 12% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

Box vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Amazon WorkDocs vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 57% of the time

Datto Workplace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 14% of the time

Hitachi Content Platform Anywhere vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Beehive vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 8% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

October 2025

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

September 2025

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server report

Download Microsoft Office SharePoint Server product report

Also Known As

Accellion

Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

September 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server report.

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.