Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery comparison

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the eDiscovery category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #12. Microsoft holds a 9.8% mindshare in eD, compared to OpenText’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Read 8 Microsoft Purview eDiscovery reviews

2,617 Views
1,884 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Read 8 OpenText EnCase eDiscovery reviews

880 Views
493 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Microsoft Purview eDiscovery compete in the legal technology space. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery often has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, which justify its price.

Features: OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is recognized for its extensive data collection capabilities, straightforward deployment, and responsive customer support. In contrast, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is valued for seamless integration with other Microsoft services, creating a robust, feature-rich environment that enhances user workflow.

Room for Improvement: OpenText EnCase eDiscovery users express a desire for better scalability, faster processing times, and improved customization options. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery users seek enhancements in customization, more intuitive functionalities, and improved customer service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText EnCase eDiscovery benefits from a straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is tightly integrated within the Microsoft ecosystem, simplifying deployment but offering mixed feedback on customer service interaction.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText EnCase eDiscovery offers a competitive setup cost, leading to favorable ROI perceptions. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery may involve higher upfront costs, yet users find the ROI worthwhile due to its robust feature set and integrated experience.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Ranking in eDiscovery

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (22nd)

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Ranking in eDiscovery

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is 9.8%, down from 26.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is 3.1%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

eDiscovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery	9.8%
OpenText EnCase eDiscovery	3.1%
Other	87.1%

eDiscovery

Featured Reviews

John Alvis

Manager, Information Technology Operations & Security at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Enables us to guarantee that we followed the regulations

The ability to query everything that's in Microsoft and send links or add people, like managers, to review the documents is valuable. It's easy as I don't have to download and email anything. I just add them as a reviewer, and they can access it from there. Purview's inclusion of critical regulations is essential. Lawyers will ask how we gathered information. With Purview, we can guarantee that we've followed the regulations. The visibility into what's happening and who has access is great for legal matters and saves us a lot of time.

Read full review

Alejandro Stromer

Director Consulting SAP OpenText en Entelgy at DCL Consultores EIM SL

A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup

The solution is scalable. It has three levels. You have the presentation area that can be escalated to the balance sheet. You have the back-end area that can be escalated using higher viability to configure more application servers. Also, the area of storage can be increased. We usually cater to enterprise solutions but have small- and medium-sized customers. It starts with 25 users and goes up to 100s and 1000s.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is its ability to search across various platforms, including Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive. It enables a streamlined, unified process for searching across these platforms."

"Our legal team benefits from using Microsoft Purview eDiscovery."

"The most valuable features are automatic content logging tagging. Performing these tasks manually would be impossible. Since most of our data is already in Microsoft, it's convenient to run it through this tool."

"The return on investment is saving the equivalent of one or two full-time IT department employees and a few hours per week for legal staff."

"The ability to query everything that's in Microsoft and send links or add people, like managers, to review the documents is valuable. It's easy as I don't have to download and email anything. I just add them as a reviewer, and they can access it from there."

"The machine learning wasn't half bad. I really like that part. I thought it was novel. It pretty much automated it, once you trained the model."

"Tasks that took an entire day before we implemented Purview now take just 30 minutes."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery has saved me personally a lot of time because I can query it, and it touches everything we have as a full Microsoft shop."

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery pros

"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."

"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."

"The technical support is excellent."

"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."

"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."

"The solution is very stable."

"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."

Cons

"We find that many critical functions are available only to E5 license holders."

"The query language can be time-consuming to figure out if you don't know it initially."

"I would suggest adding more platforms. Currently, it's compatible with OneDrive, Teams, SharePoint, and Exchange. Adding more features, as Microsoft continues to expand their cloud offerings, would be beneficial. Exploring options like Azure Files might be an avenue for improvement."

"The sorting and filtering of the result data need improvement, and the interface for writing queries is not user-friendly for business users. We still need all the backend stuff. We have to use Graph API to interface with everything and create custom interfaces on the front end to make it easier for the end users, which is costly. The reporting, sorting, and filtering capabilities that other products have aren't available natively in Purview."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery should be cheaper."

"The sorting and filtering of the result data need improvement, and the interface for writing queries is not user-friendly for business users."

"Purview eDiscovery works, but it's not entirely perfect. There were times when search results would get hung up or error codes would be presented and we'd have to contact Microsoft to get that sorted out."

"Purview Data Loss Protection for remediating policy violations needs refinement, for example, in defining what constitutes a credit card because that is where I get the most false positives."

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery cons

"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."

"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."

"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."

"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."

"There were minor UI bugs."

"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."

"Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing with Microsoft can be complex, and licensing is known to be a challenge because it changes frequently. While the licensing for Purview is not as tricky as other Microsoft products, navigating licenses since the shift to E3 and E5 plans has been a task, as individual licenses must now be purchased separately."

"In the positions that I've had through contracting over the years, I've heard talk of it being overpriced and underperforming compared to its competitors."

"The costs associated with E5 licensing are currently expensive for us, so we use the E3 license, which comes with fewer features and functionalities."

"With the full bundle, pricing is not a significant concern. As an M3, I find the Purview pricing of 1250 per user worthwhile."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery comes as part of Microsoft 365 licenses."

"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."

"The product is affordable and user-friendly."

"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."

"EnCase is an affordable solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

University

Performing Arts

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

The setup process was very straightforward. We acquired pricing through our reseller in NASDAQ, eliminating the need to search for prices ourselves.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

The query language can be time-consuming to figure out if you don't know it initially. While there are options with dropdowns to select criteria, having a natural language feature would be benefici...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

I sometimes use it for legal holds or to find lost items, and to determine what is going on. However, most of the time, my use case is legal-related.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Vault vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 23% of the time

Relativity vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 9% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 7% of the time

Exterro vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 6% of the time

Smarsh Enterprise Platform vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Competitors

BigFix vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 13% of the time

Exterro vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 12% of the time

Nuix eDiscovery vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 10% of the time

Relativity vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

January 2026

Download Microsoft Purview eDiscovery product report

Buyer's Guide

eDiscovery

February 2026

Download OpenText EnCase eDiscovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

EnCase eDiscovery

Overview

Efficiently respond to legal matters or internal investigations with intelligent capabilities that reduce data to only what’s relevant. Discover data where it lives. Discover and collect data in place, within your Microsoft Purview boundary. Manage workflows efficiently. Streamline your eDiscovery process with an end-to-end workflow from one platform. Accelerate your process. Get insights quickly with built-in capabilities, reducing review time and costs.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review.

With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

February 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery report.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.