Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs Securiti comparison

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Read 7 Securiti reviews

1,390 Views
848 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview Information Protection and Securiti based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs. Securiti Report (Updated: September 2025).

Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs. Securiti

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Ranking in Data Governance

5th

Ranking in Data Privacy Management Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (13th)

Securiti

Ranking in Data Governance

16th

Ranking in Data Privacy Management Software

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (17th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (10th), Data Detection & Response (DDR) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is 2.8%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securiti is 1.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Information Protection	2.8%
Securiti	1.9%
Other	95.3%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Abhi T

Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Achieve comprehensive data protection with reliable performance and room for enhanced discovery accuracy

The product is still in a growing phase. I could see that many use cases in their product are not capable enough in terms of detecting or protecting. Compared to other products, they are in the middle of bringing their solution up to the mark, so it is not a full-grown solution. They have to get more accurate results in terms of data discovery and classification. The second thing is their support; support from Microsoft takes a lot of time to get a response from their support team. The third thing is their OCR capability is not that great in terms of identifying the documents. We would love to see response times of less than 24 hours. Additionally, there is no way to check the policy's current status in terms of whether it got synced or not. You have to wait and test the use cases after 24 hours or after 48 hours, and once it starts working, then it appears the policy got implemented.

Read full review

AzhagarasanAnnadorai

Founder at Kaizentric Technologies Private Limited

Automating compliance processes with effective data classification

One limitation of Securiti is that it can only classify about 30% to 40% of my data. For the remaining data, even if it is PII, it may not be classified correctly. This could be due to incorrect or missing data in the dataset. Therefore, I still need to do some manual review to complete the exercise. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Securiti had a feature similar to data mesh, allowing users to directly access remote data through the Securiti UI. This would reduce the need for other tools like Snowflake.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think Purview is incredibly stable."

"Microsoft Purview Information Protection supports data classification, sensitivity labels, and data loss prevention."

"I created training materials for end users on applying different labels, explaining their purposes, and providing examples. This was crucial since end users would apply the labels in different protection scenarios. The implementation helped the organization in several ways."

"I recommend Microsoft Purview Information Protection for organizations using the Microsoft ecosystem."

"The scalability of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is excellent."

"We can restrict access or specify who can see sensitivity labels, which can be based on the classification level. We can encrypt restricted content and limit who can see that from an internal view, too, so Purview is a powerful tool."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is its ability to respond to sensitive data shared on Teams chat by deleting the message, not just monitoring or logging."

"Before using it, we had a lot of unlabeled data, and the tool helped us quickly and accurately label a large number of documents."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection pros

"Their data discovery is a fantastic product."

"The automated way of identifying and classifying personal information is very beneficial."

"Overall, I would rate Securiti a nine out of ten."

"The drag-and-drop features make Securiti easy to use, even for individuals who are not tech-savvy."

"Technical support for Securiti is good."

"The process mapping is a good tool. We have a nice view of their data."

"I would recommend Securiti to others with challenges like obtaining human resources for timely classification."

"It's very scalable. I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability."

More Securiti pros

Cons

"I would like the time it takes to update a DLP policy on an endpoint to be reduced."

"There is potential for more integration in the use of AI."

"Microsoft customer service is hit or miss. Sometimes, I get a fast and knowledgeable response, while other times, I've experienced delays and received no resolution."

"Purview could better integrate with third-party tools, but I don't have a specific use case for that because It's currently integrated into the managed services we offer to Microsoft customers using E5 licenses."

"Microsoft Purview Information Protection can improve in terms of scan concurrency and scan processing time."

"There should be more training and communication regarding new features. I may be missing those communications, but it often seems like changes happen in the Purview portal without notice. Having a roadmap or updates about new releases would be helpful for demonstrating to clients. If things are constantly changing, I sometimes look silly when I log in, and things have moved or changed."

"I had experience with previous versions of Microsoft Purview Information Protection as well. The new version doesn't have all the features that were present in the previous native clients and functionalities. For example, the ability to track documents - knowing where your document is, who is accessing it, when and where. You could even revoke access to a particular document if needed, which was a cool feature. These aren't available right now, although Microsoft is working on bringing them back, which might take some time."

"My experience with the customer service and support of Microsoft is around five out of ten. The response time is slow, and they take multiple sessions for diagnosing issues."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection cons

"Technical support can be hit or miss. Some technical staff are great, but others are not very effective. On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten."

"I would like their workflows and assessment automation to be more advanced compared to their competitors, especially under the pro core privacy module."

"Fraud prevention could be improved. If a criminal accesses my system and obtains my information, they might commit fraud."

"With the formation and education, specifically the security education, they could update the educational video more often."

"While the software is functionally robust and intuitive, there is a challenging learning curve."

"Technical support needs enhancement. It would be helpful to have better documentation and more accessible support, especially when raising support tickets."

"One limitation of Securiti is that it can only classify about 30% to 40% of my data."

"The scalability of Securiti is not high because we have to customize the solution. It is very complicated to scale, so it needs improvement."

More Securiti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Initially, Purview's cost seemed quite high because it was for personal use. I was scanning a tiny tenant and thinking, "If I extrapolate this to an enterprise-scale tenant, it will be quite costly." However, I talked to people who had compared it to other products on the market, and they're spending five figures to get started. At least, Purview has a free trial, so you can try some of the features early on."

"The tool's pricing is not a problem for customers because they often purchase it as part of a bundle. With an E5 license, for example, users get access to the entire functionality. This is one of the main reasons why many customers are choosing Microsoft."

"The pricing and setup costs are transferred to my clients, who find it affordable and are satisfied with what they receive."

"The price is determined by the enterprise licensing, either the E3 or E5 licensing or the EMS plus security and other feature licensing."

"The tool's pricing is fairly low, less than 100,000 for a year."

"The product is affordable, and our clients agree. Sensitivity labels come with the MIP license at an additional $2 a month per user, an excellent deal for auto-labeling capabilities."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

It ensures that sensitive data is automatically safeguarded, even for email attachments, regardless of the user or device.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

Pricing is good because if somebody is looking for an overall cybersecurity solution, Microsoft has one license with many solutions bundled with that license. The E5 license covers most of the solu...

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Securiti?

The pricing varies depending on the year. Two years ago, it was much cheaper, but now it is more expensive.

What needs improvement with Securiti?

While the software is functionally robust and intuitive, there is a challenging learning curve. Although it touches on operational resilience, there is potential to expand its capabilities in this ...

What is your primary use case for Securiti?

We have been evaluating Securiti ( /products/securiti-reviews ) in the context of Australian regulations such as the Australian Privacy Act and GDPR. The goal is to understand its potential for GDP...

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 10% of the time

BigID vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Competitors

BigID vs Securiti

Compared 22% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Securiti

Compared 15% of the time

OneTrust Privacy vs Securiti

Compared 15% of the time

Cyera vs Securiti

Compared 15% of the time

Concentric AI vs Securiti

Compared 4% of the time

More Securiti Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Download Microsoft Purview Information Protection product report

Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Download Securiti product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Information Protection

No data available

Overview

Implement Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) to help you discover, classify, and protect sensitive information wherever it lives or travels.

MIP capabilities are included with Microsoft 365 Compliance and give you the tools to know your data, protect your data, and prevent data loss.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Securiti is the pioneer of the Data Command Center, a centralized platform that enables the safe use of data and GenAI. It provides unified data intelligence, controls and orchestration across hybrid multicloud environments. Large global enterprises rely on Securiti's Data Command Center for data security, privacy, governance, and compliance.

Securiti has been recognized with numerous industry and analyst awards, including "Most Innovative Startup" by RSA, "Top 25 Machine Learning Startups" by Forbes, "Most Innovative AI Companies" by CB Insights, "Cool Vendor in Data Security" by Gartner, and "Privacy Management Wave Leader" by Forrester.

For more information, please visit Securiti.ai and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs. Securiti