


Microsoft Sentinel and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR compete in the security and orchestration space. Microsoft Sentinel may have the upper hand with its Azure integration and scalability, while Cortex XSOAR shines with its orchestration capabilities.
Features: Microsoft Sentinel offers seamless integration with Azure and Microsoft products, extensive automation, and scalability within its ecosystem. On the other hand, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is known for its powerful orchestration, advanced automation capabilities, and wide integration possibilities.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Sentinel users suggest a more intuitive user experience, improved documentation, and better mobile notifications. Pricing complexity and challenges with non-Microsoft integrations were also noted. For Cortex XSOAR, users seek enhanced dashboard customization, reduced licensing costs, and more user-friendly out-of-the-box playbooks.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Sentinel is primarily deployed on the public cloud, backed by robust Microsoft resources and generally favorable setup experiences. Customer support is responsive, though documentation can improve. Cortex XSOAR offers varied deployment options, with knowledgeable support that is sometimes inconsistent for non-premium users.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Sentinel follows a pay-as-you-go model, beneficial for scaling but potentially costly with data ingestion. Effective use of automation enhances ROI. Cortex XSOAR is considered high-cost, with expenses rising with additional features. Its ROI proves substantial when workflows are extensively automated in mature SOC environments.
Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts. It is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert.
By the time we officially bought Torq, we already had two workflows that were very helpful to us.
It pretty much took until we got to our first renewal where we said that this is the value we see, this is the things we want more, but that is the first place where we said we are happy enough that we want to renew.
If a customer is already using Microsoft’s ecosystem, the ROI can be positive due to seamless integration.
Our MTTR, mean time to response, improved by forty to fifty percent. Earlier, medium-severity incidents took two to three hours to resolve. Now, after Microsoft Sentinel, it is forty to fifty-five minutes.
For example, time saving on incidents is 40 to 50%, and previously, incident analysis took two to three hours, whereas now it takes 30 to 60 minutes.
We are positioning Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which can be used in the SOC and do a lot of automation for the customer.
The speed and quality of their answers have been pretty good, as I usually get a response within 24 hours, and they follow up well.
We can always get an answer, and the support team are experts in their own system.
Nine out of ten times, they give me a solution even if it is not the solution I wanted, and I still can get to the result.
Microsoft invests significantly in support, which is crucial for companies.
I believe Microsoft could improve by keeping customer service within the US for Microsoft Sentinel customers who are within state and federal government sectors.
Working with a Sentinel engineer helped us tune settings effectively.
Eight out of ten times, they provide valuable help.
Their support has been better than Anomali's and they are more responsive.
The technical support provided by Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is good.
Our case management is super scalable.
In terms of scalability, you can do as long as you can build it, and they can support it.
Regarding the ability of the solution to grow in your work environment, if it is scalable, if it fits your business requirements, and if there is room to scale up, the answer is yes, for sure.
There is no need to add hardware or redesign infrastructure because it is cloud-native.
As our organization uses Microsoft Azure and Defender, everything grows together, and we can integrate various features seamlessly.
Being a SaaS solution, the scalability of Microsoft Sentinel is robust.
The scalability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR supports our growth and security needs because we can integrate various tools and continuously add more capability.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has very good application capabilities and is highly scalable.
The issues with scalability arise from the speed of some integrations, as not all are perfectly tuned by Palo.
Most of the time, the system is stable as long as the components that they integrate with are stable.
I have never faced any downtime or issues.
Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes.
I have never experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues with Microsoft Sentinel because it is SOC as a Service, so it maintains 100% uptime and scaling.
In the past two years, our team hasn't encountered any issues with the stability of Microsoft Sentinel from an operations perspective.
I need to be aware of deprecated connectors as they may disconnect, but the data continues to be sent with a need for quick adaptation.
The system works smoothly even when I navigate deep into the playbook section.
I would rate the stability and reliability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR as a nine.
Torq should offer default templates that can directly scan firewall data and automate actions.
It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet.
From an engineering perspective, I think more error messages and error handling information for our engineering team would be very helpful.
Log ingestion and retention costs can grow quickly, and understanding which data source is driving cost is not always straightforward.
We have some tools, such as our off-site Meraki firewalls, that have not fully integrated with Sentinel.
There are complexities in calculating the right pricing tier for different customers, which makes it difficult for me as a consultant during upfront pricing.
The deployment requires integration and the development of integration modules.
One of the significant issues we encounter is system slowdown when we receive an influx of alerts, which inhibits how quickly we can access the information needed for investigation.
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play.
When they bring more and more value into the platform, it makes more sense to pay that price, but still, it is expensive.
Before deciding to implement Torq, I considered that compared to our old case management platform, Torq was a much better price and had a lot better value for what you get out of the platform, which was a key consideration for the company.
It is an expensive solution, not an inexpensive solution, but we get through the flexibility.
It has been beneficial that Microsoft Sentinel is included as part of the Microsoft package, making it more cost-effective.
Microsoft Sentinel is not a low-cost SIEM.
Microsoft Sentinel is provided at no cost, so we didn't have any issues with the cost.
For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management has significantly benefited us by integrating the case management platform with the automation, which saves time compared to managing multiple point solutions across our security stack.
The fact that I can build whatever I want within my own imagination and skills without relying on code is the best thing about Torq.
You can copy and paste a cURL command. If you have documentation or APIs, you usually have an example on the side. You basically have all the information on how the API call should be. You can just copy that and paste it into a step, and it will just build the step for you.
Microsoft Sentinel's ability to correlate data from multiple sources and its detection capabilities are essential.
Microsoft Sentinel has improved cost efficiency, which is one of the key areas we're able to win business against the ability to have threat intelligence.
Microsoft Sentinel's ability to correlate data from multiple sources enhances our threat detection capabilities beyond what is a simple data lake solution by filtering out the noise and consolidating the signal down to a meaningful level that is easier to investigate and see.
Execution of automatic tasks for collecting, enriching, and correlating security events from hundreds of different technologies.
If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier.
We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Sentinel | 10.1% |
| Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR | 8.8% |
| Torq | 3.7% |
| Other | 77.4% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.
Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.
What are the key features of Torq?In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.
Microsoft Sentinel offers cloud-native SIEM and SOAR capabilities with AI-powered threat detection, automated responses, and integration with Microsoft products. It is designed for comprehensive threat management with flexible deployment and scalability.
Microsoft Sentinel provides centralized management of cloud-based security monitoring and incident detection. Leveraging AI capabilities, it enhances threat intelligence and automation, allowing users to streamline security operations across cloud and on-premises systems. Microsoft Sentinel efficiently aggregates logs, correlates security events from multiple sources, and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft security offerings such as Defender. While its flexible deployment options and robust automation through playbooks are advantageous, users may encounter challenges with integration outside of Microsoft products, potential log ingestion delays, and a complex query language. The platform would benefit from enhanced speed, a simplified interface, improved query performance, and stronger documentation support.
What are the most important features of Microsoft Sentinel?In specific industries, Microsoft Sentinel is utilized for its capability to monitor cloud-based workloads and detect incidents effectively. Users in healthcare, finance, and retail adopt it for its strong AI-driven threat detection and its ability to integrate with existing Microsoft solutions, ensuring high-level security operations and compliance with industry standards.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR enhances security operations automation and integration. Users rely on its incident management capabilities and machine learning to improve response times and efficiency.
Cortex XSOAR stands out for its capability to automate and orchestrate security tasks through customizable playbooks and robust third-party integrations. Its analytics offer insights into incidents, while machine learning prioritizes alerts and reduces false positives. Despite its powerful features, users note room for improvement in documentation, interface design, and integration capabilities. Cost and complexity in setup and deployment are also concerns. Users in security operations centers benefit significantly from automated data enrichment, streamlined incident response, and efficient handling of threats like phishing and endpoint management.
What are the key features of Cortex XSOAR?Cortex XSOAR is implemented across industries for automating and streamlining security operations. Organizations use it to create playbooks, integrate with security tools, and automate repetitive tasks, thereby improving the efficiency of their security operations centers and incident management processes.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.