Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Quorum OnQ comparison

The compared Mimecast and Quorum solutions aren't in the same category. Mimecast is ranked #16 in DLP , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 2.6% mindshare in the category. Quorum is ranked #40 in BRS , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Quorum users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Code42 Incydr and Quorum OnQ are two strong contenders in the data security and backup solutions market. Based on user feedback, Code42 Incydr seems to have the upper hand in terms of feature richness and user satisfaction, while Quorum OnQ is noted for its robust recovery capabilities and overall reliability.

Features: Code42 Incydr is known for its advanced data loss detection, rapid response capabilities, and seamless integration with existing systems. In contrast, Quorum OnQ stands out for its dependable disaster recovery, ease of use in critical scenarios, and comprehensive recovery solutions.

Room for Improvement: Code42 Incydr could enhance its mobile experience, improve reporting features, and provide better customization options. Quorum OnQ users suggest improvements in scalability, additional documentation for complex deployments, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Code42 Incydr is straightforward to deploy and offers efficient customer support, making the transition easy for users. Quorum OnQ also scores well in deployment efficiency but is particularly noted for its highly responsive customer service and effective troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Users find that Code42 Incydr offers competitive pricing relative to its features and security benefits, resulting in a favorable ROI. Quorum OnQ's pricing is higher, but users feel justified due to its top-tier disaster recovery features and overall dependability.

To learn more, read our detailed Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 886,426 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection	2.6%
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	6.9%
Cyera	5.3%
Other	85.2%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Quorum OnQ	0.9%
Veeam Data Platform	6.1%
Rubrik	3.6%
Other	89.4%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

reviewer2594778

Senior Application Analyst at a non-profit with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enhanced filtering for advocate emails

Quorum provides an elevated ability to filter on everything from people's location to age to their voting history. This is an extreme feature that will help our advocacy department a lot. It encompasses the ability to formulate emails and calls to action across regions. Their platform is more advanced than our previous one. It provides a smooth training experience and easy terminology for those in the advocacy world.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloudflare is simple to use."

"Clover is the best product globally."

"Cloudflare DDoS is better than its competitors for its security, deployment, and scalability."

"We mostly use Cloudflare WAF, and gets basic Cloudflaire DDoS, caching as extra bonus . We like the factor these features are all integrated into 1 console, simple to manage."

"Cloudflare Access is part of the Zero Trust philosophy."

"It's the endpoint exposition. We don't need to expose our VPN server to the internet and need a zero-test solution. I can apply some conditional access to the endpoint that's connecting to our network to check their security policies or the security condition of their workstation. Once the workstation is trying to connect to my internal network, then I would like to check the discrete condition of these endpoints that are trying to access my internal network. We created some conditional access. We have CrowdStrike, to check if the CrowdStrike is installed, to check if it's updated, and to check for Windows updates. We created some conditional policies to check it."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable features as almost no effort was needed to learn the configurations. It is also one of the cheapest firewalls available in this category."

"It will take the blow rather than our applications should an attack occur."

More Cloudflare One pros

"Set-and-forget (but email reports are available) backup process."

"Seamless backup of our valuable data on mobile systems."

"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."

"The product isn't free, but the value that is given with the software functionality is top of the line."

"In my opinion the CrashPlan solution is best of breed for a corporate data backup solution."

"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome."

"No longer the fear of losing work which has been worked on for a long time."

"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros

"From a disaster-recovery point of view, one of the things I really like is that I can test the virtual copy of the physical server on a test network and compare the servers side-by-side, without interfering with the production network. So I can see and make sure that the latest copy of the server is the physical copy of the server, without interfering with production."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"Whether it is a single server failure, storage failure, network failure, a digital attack or a ransomware, or whether it's an application crash or a database corruption, or any kind of natural disaster or data center failure, Quorum ensures the recovery of the complete business process."

"The most valuable feature is spinning up a ready-to-go VM in a test or production environment that is based on a backup stored on the Quorum device."

"When it comes to recovering what you need from a backup, it's really easy. You just drill through the directory, find the file and the date that you want, and click to recover. You then pick the directory you want to save it in. Usually, it takes a minute or two and it's done. It's quick and easy."

"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."

"I sleep better knowing that Quorum is there."

"The solution offers good documentation."

More Quorum OnQ pros

Cons

"There are premium tier live service and lower tier live service, so we opted for the lower tier. But there is no medium tier where we pay a little extra and get a bit more service. So if that can be improved."

"The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems."

"The response time for support must be reduced."

"The software has automated alerts, but the automated alerts are not available in the mobile app."

"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"Feedback could be enhanced."

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

More Cloudflare One cons

"CrashPlan deployment and integration with existing systems was easy, but the interface could be more helpful to non-tech savvy users."

"I would love to have an app on my phone to give me status updates on the backup system and push me notifications if something goes offline or has an issue so I wouldn't have to go look at the dashboard as much."

"The licenses are not so cheap, but are also scalable to your number of customers."

"From time to time, you will see issues with the software not connecting to the on-premise server, or the client crashes on a users machine."

"Since the product works in the background and, so far, has been able to restore multiple versions of files, I don't see any need for improvement."

"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."

"Reporting could be stronger. With the API you can do a lot of reporting, but it is not built in very robustly."

"Upgrade process a bit time consuming, but worth the time."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons

"One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."

"The one thing they could do is some tweaking on the web solution that's supposed to monitor everything from one page, rather than having to bring each server up on its own webpage."

"It feels to me like it's going to be a little bit more work than I originally anticipated when upgrading the appliance. I haven't done that yet so I can't speak from true experience, but I went through the project plan and it feels to me like there's quite a number of pieces and components and things that have to be done. Quorum is going to manage the rollout, but in starting the initial conversation there were a lot of unanswered questions"

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"The one thing they could do is some tweaking on the web solution that's supposed to monitor everything from one page, rather than having to bring each server up on its own webpage. It doesn't always accurately show what the system's state is at the time, and we have to restart that process now and then."

"It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular."

"They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments with different needs."

"I would really like it if they followed comparable products from other vendors and had an option where you could offload to tape."

More Quorum OnQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years."

"We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but I know it's expensive."

"The solution’s pricing is economical."

"When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different."

"Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product...There are no ingress and egress charges in the product."

"The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."

"When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."

More Quorum OnQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

22%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quorum OnQ?

It is a very scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quorum OnQ?

It's a little expensive. That said, the cost aligns with other advocacy tools we have evaluated.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quorum OnQ?

They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 5% of the time

HYCU R-Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 4% of the time

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

More Quorum OnQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

April 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

March 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection report

Download Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Quorum OnQ

March 2026

Download Quorum OnQ product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

OnQ

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection streamlines automated backups and simplifies navigation with intuitive interfaces, supporting cross-platform environments and central administration.

Offering seamless integration of security and management tools, Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection enhances data protection while ensuring ease of use. With real-time data management and centralized administration, businesses experience minimized maintenance effort. Despite needing improvements in reporting, account management, and mobile integration, its robust risk scoring and lightweight clients offer substantial benefits. Designed for corporate and HIPAA-related data, it aids recovery from device losses and strengthens data loss prevention, integrating well into egress strategies.

What are the key features of Mimecast?

Automated Backups: Ensures data is backed up seamlessly with minimal intervention.
Real-time Data Management: Provides up-to-date data access and processing.
Cross-platform Support: Maintains functionality across different systems and devices.
Intuitive Interfaces: Easy navigation improves user experience.
Centralized Administration: Allows for streamlined management of data and security measures.
Risk Scoring: Customizable settings for enhanced data protection.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex data protection tasks with intuitive processes.
Maintenance Efficiency: Reduces manual effort through automated features.
Resource Utilization: Optimizes device and cloud resources for better performance.
Robust Support: Ensures help is readily available to address issues.

Industries like healthcare and legal benefit from Mimecast's data recovery support for HIPAA-compliance and large-scale unstructured data management. The platform is adaptable for both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, essential for maintaining security in high-risk environments such as during legal investigations.

Mimecast

Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

Quorum

Sample Customers

23andMe

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

LCL Bulk Transport

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ

April 2025

Free Report: Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ report.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.