Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Teramind comparison

Mimecast and Teramind are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Mimecast is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0, while Teramind is ranked #43. Mimecast holds a 2.5% mindshare in DLP, compared to Teramind’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution.

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Read 78 Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection reviews

3,319 Views
1,726 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Teramind

Read 1 Teramind review

946 Views
407 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Teramind

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 11, 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Teramind both operate in the realm of security and data protection. Teramind seems to have an advantage in overall effectiveness and customer satisfaction, possibly due to its extensive monitoring features.

Features: Mimecast offers features like email security, data loss prevention, and insider threat detection. Its standout feature is automatic insider risk identification. Teramind provides employee monitoring, real-time monitoring, and productivity analysis, excelling in user activity analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast is known for its smooth cloud-based deployment and responsive customer support with quick issue resolution. Teramind offers more involved deployment with both on-premises and cloud options, providing flexibility and strong customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup with strong ROI through its email protection and risk management tools. Teramind, while having a higher setup cost, offers higher potential ROI with its comprehensive monitoring and productivity-enhancing insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teramind

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

43rd

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (6th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is 2.5%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teramind is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Mimecast Incydr	2.5%
Teramind	0.7%
Other	96.8%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

Dinesh Kaarthik

Technical Support Executive at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited

A stable solution that provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console

If a person wants to use a DLP product, they must know what data they want to protect and how to block, allow, and monitor data. We will not have any issues if the policies are correct and the user is authorized to perform the actions. Uninstalling is also pretty quick. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive."

"Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use"

"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets."

"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."

"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."

"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."

"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros

"The product provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console."

Cons

"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited."

"I think one we can improve is the compression."

"Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."

"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."

"Java, please get rid of Java."

"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."

"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."

"I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons

"The user experience should be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Varonis Platform vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors

Dtex Systems vs Teramind

Compared 26% of the time

DTEX InTERCEPT vs Teramind

Compared 10% of the time

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Teramind

Compared 10% of the time

Veriato User Activity Monitoring (UAM) vs Teramind

Compared 7% of the time

Exabeam vs Teramind

Compared 5% of the time

More Teramind Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

January 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection report

Download Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

January 2026

Download Teramind product report

Also Known As

Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

No data available

Overview

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection streamlines automated backups and simplifies navigation with intuitive interfaces, supporting cross-platform environments and central administration.

Offering seamless integration of security and management tools, Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection enhances data protection while ensuring ease of use. With real-time data management and centralized administration, businesses experience minimized maintenance effort. Despite needing improvements in reporting, account management, and mobile integration, its robust risk scoring and lightweight clients offer substantial benefits. Designed for corporate and HIPAA-related data, it aids recovery from device losses and strengthens data loss prevention, integrating well into egress strategies.

What are the key features of Mimecast?

Automated Backups: Ensures data is backed up seamlessly with minimal intervention.
Real-time Data Management: Provides up-to-date data access and processing.
Cross-platform Support: Maintains functionality across different systems and devices.
Intuitive Interfaces: Easy navigation improves user experience.
Centralized Administration: Allows for streamlined management of data and security measures.
Risk Scoring: Customizable settings for enhanced data protection.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex data protection tasks with intuitive processes.
Maintenance Efficiency: Reduces manual effort through automated features.
Resource Utilization: Optimizes device and cloud resources for better performance.
Robust Support: Ensures help is readily available to address issues.

Industries like healthcare and legal benefit from Mimecast's data recovery support for HIPAA-compliance and large-scale unstructured data management. The platform is adaptable for both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, essential for maintaining security in high-risk environments such as during legal investigations.

Mimecast

Teramind provides a user-centric security approach to monitor employee behavior. Our software streamlines employee data collection in order to identify suspicious activity, detect possible threats, monitor employee efficiency, and ensure industry compliance. We help reduce security incidents by providing real-time access to user activities by offering alerts, warnings, redirects and user lock-outs to keep your business running as efficiently and secure as possible. We offer both cloud-based and on-premise deployment options to meet your organization’s requirements.

Teramind

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Government, Healthcare, Finance, Retails, Energy, Utilities and more. Example: Orange, Holiday Inn, Azteca

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.