Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Veza vs miniOrange PAM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

miniOrange PAM
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
18th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veza
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
25th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
GRC (26th), Identity Management (IM) (19th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (11th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (7th), Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of miniOrange PAM is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veza is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
miniOrange PAM0.7%
Veza1.3%
Other98.0%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

MP
Owner at Wishmarathi.com
Automated access control and session monitoring have strengthened internal security and compliance
One of the most beneficial aspects of miniOrange PAM is the customization it offers; we can tailor the PAM solution to our requirements. miniOrange PAM is also very cost-effective. The best features are just-in-time access management and privileged session monitoring, along with the password vault and agentless architecture, which are significant features of miniOrange PAM. miniOrange PAM's agentless architecture allows us to access it directly from our browser without requiring installation on our systems, which greatly simplifies our usage. Since implementing miniOrange PAM in our organization, we have observed significant positive impacts on efficiency. Before we implemented PAM, we manually provided access to all end-users who needed it, but now that process is automated, improving our operational efficiency. In terms of security, miniOrange PAM has reduced insider threats, making our systems much more secure. Regarding compliance, miniOrange PAM helps us comply with certain regulations in our e-commerce industry. Our productivity has significantly improved since we added miniOrange PAM, and we recovered our costs within six months, saving a lot of money previously spent on other cybersecurity tools.
Brooke Lynne Bowman - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Compliance Manager at a healthcare company with 201-500 employees
Streamlined compliance process with custom control framework and AI-driven security questionnaire management
Vanta has made the security questionnaire process much easier, thanks to AI. It automatically extracts answers and populates them within the SIG. The custom control framework allows me to incorporate our HITRUST controls and additional ISO twenty-seven thousand and one and financial controls. Moreover, it includes a knowledge bank for questionnaires and RFPs, making information updates more streamlined.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for miniOrange PAM?
We use Amazon Web Services for our private cloud setup, and miniOrange PAM charges two dollars per user. We have a license for twenty end-users and one admin, where the admin cost is five dollars p...
What needs improvement with miniOrange PAM?
Currently, all the features we require are present in miniOrange PAM, although there are some advanced features under development that we do not require at this moment. There is nothing that I wish...
What is your primary use case for miniOrange PAM?
In our organization, we rely on miniOrange PAM to limit and monitor employee access to privileged accounts. We have many employees who have access to privileged accounts, and we utilize the just-in...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veza?
The overall price point of Vanta is commendable, especially considering the custom control framework that allows me to evade the high costs associated with HITRUST licensing.
What needs improvement with Veza?
The support experience could be better. We often need to escalate our issues to the account executive to receive a response, especially when support is needed for integrations.
What is your primary use case for Veza?
We are currently in the implementation stages of Vanta. It's been challenging to build out as it is not as intuitive as OneTrust, especially in terms of scoping and needs.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Delinea and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.