No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

MuleSoft Composer vs Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
MuleSoft Composer improves data exchange, boosts efficiency by up to 70%, and supports scalable integration across departments, suggesting high value.
Sentiment score
6.9
Oracle Data Integrator offers strong ROI through automation and efficiency, with positive feedback on stability and cloud enhancements.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.2
MuleSoft Composer's customer service is generally satisfactory, though improvements are needed in response time and priority services.
Sentiment score
5.8
ODI customer support solves issues effectively, yet users face response delays, communication challenges, especially in multi-technology integrations.
The technical support of Oracle is very good; they support the Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) solution effectively.
Head of Data Services – Services Partner at 3 As Technologies
I can get solutions quickly, and any tickets I submit to Oracle are responded to and resolved rapidly.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.0
MuleSoft Composer is rated positively for scalability, supporting both large user numbers and smaller groups efficiently.
Sentiment score
7.6
Oracle Data Integrator is scalable and adaptable, handling large projects effectively, though resource demands may pose challenges.
The scalability and the ability to handle multiple workloads of several parallel ETL jobs could use improvement.
Head of Data Services – Services Partner at 3 As Technologies
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Users praise MuleSoft Composer's stability and support, noting minor glitches but effective resource deployment and no crashes.
Sentiment score
7.4
Oracle Data Integrator shows strong stability improvements, with rare issues, efficient management of large volumes, and occasional integration challenges.
In terms of performance stability, I have not experienced any downtimes, crashes, or performance issues with the Oracle Data Integrator (ODI).
Head of Data Services – Services Partner at 3 As Technologies
 

Room For Improvement

MuleSoft Composer needs platform integration, interface, scalability enhancements, effective guidance, AI, simplified configuration, and improved monitoring features.
ODI needs better UI performance, tool compatibility, GitHub integration, error handling, real-time AI features, pricing, and external version control.
It would be better to concentrate on one platform and develop everything on it for the integrated development environment.
BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Integrating AI with ODI that provides recommendations on how to fix those data quality issues after analyzing and profiling business data would be excellent.
Head of Data Services – Services Partner at 3 As Technologies
If I use a source system like Oracle and a target system like Teradata, ODI will still run, but it struggles a bit with different infrastructures.
Adding AI capabilities would make Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) even better.
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

MuleSoft Composer pricing is seen as high, prompting calls for regional adjustments to enhance accessibility for medium companies.
Oracle Data Integrator pricing varies; costs are influenced by licensing complexity, with potential savings through discounts and bundled solutions.
ODI is cheaper compared to Informatica PowerCenter and IBM DataStage.
The pricing aspect of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is reasonable; it brings significant value to the table.
Head of Data Services – Services Partner at 3 As Technologies
 

Valuable Features

MuleSoft Composer simplifies integration for Salesforce users with prebuilt connectors and compatibility without requiring programming skills.
Oracle Data Integrator optimizes EL-T processing with flexible integration, supporting diverse technologies and enhancing data management efficiency.
It has more options for installation and architecture because it can run entirely on-premise.
BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
The main benefits that Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) brings to the table include data quality, data completeness functionality, metadata management, and the reverse engineering feature, which allows integrating the metadata of diversified data sources with a single click.
Head of Data Services – Services Partner at 3 As Technologies
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)'s ELT architecture has helped optimize my data movement and transformation significantly.
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is powerful and strong if my system uses Oracle components for environments like OLTP, enterprise data warehouse, or data marts.
 

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer
Ranking in Data Integration
37th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (17th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Ranking in Data Integration
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is 2.5%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)2.5%
MuleSoft Composer0.8%
Other96.7%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903 - PeerSpot reviewer
BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility
I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.
Hafiz Mannan - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Data Services – Services Partner at 3 As Technologies
Facilitates complex data integration with ease and flexibility
It would be great if ODI could link the designer, mapping, and workflows in a more simplified manner, maybe in one combined interface. It would be excellent not to have to go into different areas to perform different activities but rather have a user-defined interface where we can configure a job, run it, monitor it, link packages, and link subprocesses all in one frame instead of having the designer separately, mapping separately, and monitoring and session management separately. With respect to data quality challenges, it would be great to give an option to fix data quality issues based on AI. Integrating AI with ODI that provides recommendations on how to fix those data quality issues after analyzing and profiling business data would be excellent. One of the main disadvantages of the Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is that it sometimes takes a lot of resources when handling multiple jobs. The scalability and the ability to handle multiple workloads of several parallel ETL jobs could use improvement, and certain parallel threads should be added along with the ability to configure multiple jobs from the same data directory structure.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user99375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Database Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Mar 31, 2014
Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Active Dataguard
As an Oracle DBA, while working upon high availability of your database you may stumble upon various Oracle strategic capabilities that fall into categories of Oracle Replication. Oracle provides various technologies for replication like GoldenGate, streams, and Active Dataguard. Replication…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Construction Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise44
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?
The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.
What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?
I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
In comparison with other products of the same range, licensing mode is really attractive, no need to license according technology/topology to be used and an incredible Versatility to build any Data...
 

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce
ODI
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Griffith University, Kansas City Power & Light, Keste, Raymond James Financial, Valdosta State University
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.