MuleSoft Composer vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Salesforce and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Salesforce is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.8, while SAP is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.0. Salesforce holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,650 Views
809 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

1,466 Views
880 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAP Replication Server and MuleSoft Composer are competitive products in the data integration and replication space. MuleSoft Composer seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and adaptability, making it ideal for agile and scalable integrations.

Features: SAP Replication Server handles large-scale, high-volume transactions effectively, providing strong data consistency and enterprise-level data handling. It offers complex data integration capabilities essential for large enterprises. MuleSoft Composer offers extensive pre-built connectors, a low-code interface for quick integrations, and flexibility in connecting varied applications. Its agile design is suited for businesses aiming for fast, efficient integrations.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server could improve its learning curve and reduce the technical complexity required for deployment. Optimizing customer service response could enhance user experience. Enhancing its flexibility to integrate with modern platforms could be beneficial. MuleSoft Composer can expand its support for more complex technical replication processes. Increasing pre-built connector varieties and improving data consistency features could offer significant value. Better handling of high-volume data transactions might enhance its appeal to larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Replication Server features a steep learning curve that requires technical expertise, contributing to longer deployment times, though it is robust once implemented. MuleSoft Composer offers a quicker and more intuitive deployment process with comprehensive support services, providing a positive customer experience with its easy-to-use interfaces and responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server involves higher upfront costs, appealing to enterprises willing to invest in sophisticated solutions but may take longer for ROI due to its technical depth. MuleSoft Composer offers competitive pricing with a subscription model, achieving faster ROI due to lower operational costs and efficient integration processes.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Replication Server Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Replication Server

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (16th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Data Integration

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	0.7%
SAP Replication Server	0.8%
Other	98.5%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer1834542

Finance Business Process Improvement, Transformation and Project Management at a consultancy with self employed

Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage

The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades. As a company, you're either hiring or paying an outsourcer to do that, and you have to manage it, keep up with the updates to the hardware, software, and the operating system. It's very expensive because there's a lot to control and take care of.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

Cons

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

"It's a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Retailer

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Replication Server?

It's a pretty good product and stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Replication Server?

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to repl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Replication Server?

It's basically to transfer data from one server to another. It's used for this purpose.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 10% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 11% of the time

Fivetran vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 8% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 7% of the time

Backup and Recovery for Salesforce vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

January 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Information and data-driven insight is what powers business today. But to get the most from your enterprise data, you need a way to bring transactional, streaming, social media, and other data together – regardless of its format and whether it’s structured or unstructured – and be able to analyze it. The challenge is moving, replicating, and centralizing a wide variety of data efficiently, cost-effectively, and quickly enough to meet business demands for active insight. SAP® Replication Server® can help. SAP Replication Server enables the continuous movement of mission-critical application data.

SAP

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Replication Server

January 2026

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Replication Server

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Replication Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.