Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs Pure Storage FlashBlade comparison

NetApp and Pure Storage are both solutions in the All-Flash Storage category. NetApp is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5, while Pure Storage is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.8. NetApp holds a 0.8% mindshare in AFS, compared to Pure Storage’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Pure Storage users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Read 36 Pure FlashArray X NVMe reviews
  • 1,736 Views
  • 1,406 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
NetApp NVMe AFF A800
Read 11 NetApp NVMe AFF A800 reviews
  • 1,048 Views
  • 975 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Read 38 Pure Storage FlashBlade reviews
  • 5,202 Views
  • 1,977 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Pure Storage FlashBlade and NetApp NVMe AFF A800 are two competing storage solutions. Users are happier with the performance of NetApp NVMe AFF A800, yet Pure Storage FlashBlade offers attractive pricing and simplicity that users appreciate.

Features: Pure Storage FlashBlade users value its high throughput, scalability, and simplicity. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is noted for its low latency, integration with various data services, and robust performance.

Room for Improvement: Pure Storage FlashBlade users suggest enhancements in NAS protocol support, better snapshot capabilities, and more extensive firmware options. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 users want improvements in firmware updates, system upgrades, and a more user-friendly interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pure Storage FlashBlade is praised for its straightforward deployment and proactive customer support. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 provides comprehensive deployment guides but sometimes finds the setup complex.

Pricing and ROI: Pure Storage FlashBlade users find the pricing competitive and encounter a quick return on investment due to its performance and efficiency. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 users acknowledge its higher cost but believe the superior performance justifies the investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
Organizations reduced costs and improved performance with Pure FlashArray X NVMe, achieving quick ROI and efficient resource management.
Sentiment score
1.0
Users praised NetApp NVMe AFF A800 for boosting speed, reducing costs, and enhancing reliability, efficiency, and scalability.
Sentiment score
8.5
Pure Storage FlashBlade boosts ROI by reducing costs, enhancing efficiencies, increasing VM density, and saving 20%-85% in time.
By opting for the gold subscription every three years, you get a free upgrade to the latest controller release.
If you wait more than seven years to buy another one, you get a return on your investment.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure FlashArray X NVMe report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report
It does not require much management once you set up correctly, so it saves time, allowing an admin to focus on other work.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
SajithEruvangai - PeerSpot reviewerEugene Hemphill - PeerSpot reviewer
PP
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Pure FlashArray X NVMe's technical support is praised for responsiveness, despite occasional follow-up issues, earning high customer satisfaction.
Sentiment score
6.2
Customers rate NetApp NVMe AFF A800 support highly for responsiveness, professionalism, and valuable information despite occasional response delays.
Sentiment score
7.0
Pure Storage FlashBlade support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge but criticized for slower responses and occasional language barriers.
We also had one outage where a controller of one of the products had failed and had to be replaced on-site.
Customers always have their issues resolved promptly.
Pure has good storage.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure FlashArray X NVMe report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report
I would rate them an eight out of ten.
The support is done through email and is not that great, making it a very problematic area I've been dealing with for over four years.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
reviewer943512 - PeerSpot reviewerEugene Hemphill - PeerSpot reviewerGokhan Dikmen - PeerSpot reviewer
RE
PP
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Pure FlashArray X NVMe offers scalable storage with low latency, easy upgrades, though capacity customization and high costs are noted.
Sentiment score
6.6
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 offers scalable expansion, manageable by enterprises, with minor limitations noted for cloud integration and upgrades.
Sentiment score
8.8
Pure Storage FlashBlade is praised for scalability, ease of expansion, and support, despite some areas needing improvement.
It is highly scalable.
It is suitable for both medium-sized and enterprise businesses.
It hasn't broken down anytime in the last six to seven years, despite hurricanes, earthquakes, and power outages.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure FlashArray X NVMe report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report
Pure Storage FlashBlade is scalable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
Joerg Utesch - PeerSpot reviewerJaka Demšar - PeerSpot reviewerEugene Hemphill - PeerSpot reviewer
PP
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Pure Storage offers exceptional stability and reliability with outstanding support, consistently achieving high user ratings for performance and service.
Sentiment score
7.6
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is praised for reliability, performance, and fast issue resolution, achieving high satisfaction and stability.
Sentiment score
8.8
Pure Storage FlashBlade is praised for its impressive stability and reliability, with minimal disruptions and consistent uptime even during upgrades.
During the eight years, there have been no problems such as hardware failure or stopping.
I would rate the stability of the solution as a ten out of ten.
I would rate the stability of the product at seven out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure FlashArray X NVMe report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report
In case there is any issue with any blade, the data is moved to another.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
Gokhan Dikmen - PeerSpot reviewerSajithEruvangai - PeerSpot reviewer
GC
RE
 

Room For Improvement

Pure FlashArray X requires cost-effective improvements in UI, integration, cloud features, multitenancy, analytics, backup, AI, and scalability.
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 requires cost reduction, setup simplification, stability improvements, enhanced UI, and better cloud integration and performance.
Users seek better cloud integration, enhanced deduplication, improved support, protocol enhancements, simpler configuration, and a more intuitive interface.
We would appreciate a built-in transparent failover in the next release to eliminate the need for a separate metro cluster.
I'm eagerly anticipating the roadmap's promise of introducing multiple controllers, which could significantly boost scalability and resilience.
We mostly rely on long-term releases. We don't need the most up-to-date features, but we need a reliable environment.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure FlashArray X NVMe report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report
Technical support definitely needs significant improvement.
Its configuration should be easier.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
Joerg Utesch - PeerSpot reviewerSajithEruvangai - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer943512 - PeerSpot reviewer
PP
RE
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers see Pure FlashArray X NVMe as a justified premium investment due to performance and comprehensive licensing.
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 pricing opinions vary; some find it reasonable, others desire cost reductions, highlighting differing budget constraints.
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers high performance and features, justifying its cost with no extra software fees and fixed support costs.
While the prices may be higher than those of other vendors, we see it as a market leader with benefits.
The support can be a bit pricey, but the solution is more cost-effective than anything else out there.
I would give it a nine out of ten in terms of costliness.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure FlashArray X NVMe report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the past, but one benefit is that they have built-in ransomware protection.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
Enes SUZER - PeerSpot reviewerEugene Hemphill - PeerSpot reviewerSajithEruvangai - PeerSpot reviewer
PP
 

Valuable Features

Pure FlashArray X NVMe offers exceptional performance, reliability, scalability, and seamless VMware integration, enhancing workload efficiency and user experience.
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 provides stable, high-performance storage with low latency, easy setup, and efficient management for enhanced application performance.
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers fast, scalable, and user-friendly storage with efficient integration, analytics, and versatility for diverse needs.
Pure Storage has signature security technology, which cannot be deleted, even if you are an administrator.
The platform's robust features include excellent sustainability tracking, and a comprehensive dashboard offering insights into IOPS, bandwidth, performance, and virtual activities.
Its data compression feature is the best that we have ever seen.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure FlashArray X NVMe report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report
We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte.
The best features of Pure Storage FlashBlade include better throughput and better performance.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
Gokhan Dikmen - PeerSpot reviewerSajithEruvangai - PeerSpot reviewerEugene Hemphill - PeerSpot reviewer
RE
PP
 

Categories and Ranking

Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Sponsored
Ranking in All-Flash Storage
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays (6th)
NetApp NVMe AFF A800
Ranking in All-Flash Storage
27th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays (12th)
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Ranking in All-Flash Storage
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Storage (SDS) (8th), File and Object Storage (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the All-Flash Storage category, the mindshare of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
All-Flash Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Jaehoon Oh - PeerSpot reviewer
Supports efficient storage management through volume snapshots and offers reliable non-disruptive upgrades
I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could be enhanced. I can see the performance statistics in the Pure Storage console, but it does not show the performance by 4K byte unit. It displays IOPS and bandwidth, but IOPS is about real use, and I want to know how many IOPS are currently running in 4K byte units. I cannot see that IOPS because most storage systems report their performance by 4K byte unit. I want to see Pure Storage performance by 4K byte unit to compare with other storage or other internal NVMe SSD.
Read full review
HelderValente - PeerSpot reviewer
Data performance improves with reduced latency and reliable architecture
The integration with cloud ecosystems has not effectively supported our hybrid cloud deployments as we use directly the provider, not the hybrid cloud. I don't have any add-on to suggest for improvement, but in my opinion, the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 product is pretty good. I am satisfied with what I have in NetApp NVMe AFF A800 and don't require additional features in the next release. They should promote NetApp NVMe AFF A800 more for other clients in my region.
Read full review
Eric Black - PeerSpot reviewer
The ability to leverage multi-tenancy along with immutability is a huge benefit for us
The only thing I feel FlashBlade is missing is the SOS API. If it had SOS API, that would put it well over the top. Veeam Backup specifically has started to streamline their API, and they are doing that with SOS API. They have optimized it. Any of the S3 devices out there that support this SOS API can have far more API calls at once. On our side, that translates to better restoration. With SOS API, it can leverage far more restorations at a single given time or read from the device in simple terms. That results in maximizing the output and throughput from the device itself.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which All-Flash Storage solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Educational Organization
9%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure FlashArray X NVMe?
Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure FlashArray X NVMe?
The price of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is very expensive, though I do not know the actual price because I am using the E...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Pure FlashArray X NVMe?
I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could ...
See all answers
What do you like most about NetApp NVMe AFF A800?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a product that is fast and provides a fast I/O.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp NVMe AFF A800?
The pricing of NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is good currently, so I don't have any issues regarding the pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetApp NVMe AFF A800?
The integration with cloud ecosystems has not effectively supported our hybrid cloud deployments as we use directly t...
See all answers
What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power out...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the pas...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?
I believe there is not much improvement needed because they have everything we need, but the interface is a little bi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 25% of the time
TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 17% of the time
Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 13% of the time
HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 10% of the time
IBM FlashSystem vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
IBM FlashSystem vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 9% of the time
More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Competitors
Dell PowerStore vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800 Logo
Dell PowerStore vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800
Compared 22% of the time
NetApp ASA vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800 Logo
NetApp ASA vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800
Compared 17% of the time
Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800 Logo
Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800
Compared 16% of the time
Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800 Logo
Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800
Compared 10% of the time
More NetApp NVMe AFF A800 Competitors
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 19% of the time
MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 10% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 10% of the time
Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 10% of the time
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 3% of the time
More Pure Storage FlashBlade Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Pure FlashArray X NVMe
August 2025
Pure FlashArray X NVMe reportDownload Pure FlashArray X NVMe product report
Buyer's Guide
NetApp NVMe AFF A800
August 2025
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 reportDownload NetApp NVMe AFF A800 product report
Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashBlade
August 2025
Pure Storage FlashBlade reportDownload Pure Storage FlashBlade product report
 

Also Known As

Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Pure Storage

Your data is a gold mine. Get the most out of it - faster - with AFF A800. Designed for NVMe media, further accelerated with NVMe/FC connectivity to the host, AFF A800 all-flash systems deliver an incredible sub-200 microsecond latency. Providing more than 11.4M IOPS and 300GB/s throughput in a single cluster, AFF A800 redefines the limit of what’s possible with artificial intelligence and deep learning.

NetApp

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Pure Storage
 

Sample Customers

Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company
Information Not Available
ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
Buyer's Guide
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade
July 2025
Free Report: NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade report.
See our list of best All-Flash Storage vendors.

We monitor all All-Flash Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.