Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo

Top 10 Pure Storage FlashBlade Alternatives

Vendor: Pure Storage
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Pure Storage FlashBlade Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Pure Storage FlashBlade based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerStore, Red Hat Ceph Storage, and MinIO. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Pure Storage FlashBlade surpasses its competitors by delivering industry-leading performance, simplicity, and scalability with its unified fast file and object storage, seamless data mobility, and Evergreen architecture, ensuring users experience maximum efficiency and cost-effectiveness in data management.

Pure Storage Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Pure Storage, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell PowerStore
4.3 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell PowerStore
4.3 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in speed, scalability, and data reduction. In comparison, Dell PowerStore stands out for its versatility and intelligent data management. Pure Storage FlashBlade appeals with straightforward deployment, while Dell PowerStore attracts with flexible deployment options and competitive pricing.
Download Dell PowerStore vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade has low setup costs, making it a cost-effective solution for initial deployment. Dell PowerStore, on the other hand, incurs higher setup costs but offers extensive customization and scalability options.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade has low setup costs, making it a cost-effective solution for initial deployment. Dell PowerStore, on the other hand, incurs higher setup costs but offers extensive customization and scalability options.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ceph Storage is valued for its scalability and open-source flexibility, appealing to cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade, with its speed and efficient deployment, is suitable for businesses prioritizing performance and quick implementation, despite higher initial costs.
Download Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage Report
Red Hat Ceph Storage's setup cost is low with scalable pricing, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a higher initial cost but emphasizes ease of deployment. The main difference lies in affordability versus simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ceph Storage's setup cost is low with scalable pricing, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a higher initial cost but emphasizes ease of deployment. The main difference lies in affordability versus simplicity.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
MinIO
4.0 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
MinIO
4.0 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers high performance with seamless scalability, whereas MinIO is open-source with excellent erasure coding. In comparison, MinIO integrates flexibly with various storage and cloud solutions and Pure Storage FlashBlade is recognized for its low latency and superior hardware capabilities.
Download MinIO vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers competitive setup costs, appealing to enterprises seeking robust data solutions, while MinIO provides a more flexible and cost-effective initial setup, ideal for organizations prioritizing budget and scalability needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers competitive setup costs, appealing to enterprises seeking robust data solutions, while MinIO provides a more flexible and cost-effective initial setup, ideal for organizations prioritizing budget and scalability needs.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
NetApp AFF
4.5 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
NetApp AFF
4.5 out of 5
NetApp AFF excels in pricing and customer service, offering high performance and reliability with seamless integration, making it cost-effective with good ROI. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade justifies its higher cost with speed, scalability, and innovative features, providing high ROI despite higher complexity.
Download NetApp AFF vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
NetApp AFF's setup cost is frequently highlighted for its efficiency and lower upfront investment, while Pure Storage FlashBlade's setup cost tends to be higher, reflecting its premium positioning and advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
NetApp AFF's setup cost is frequently highlighted for its efficiency and lower upfront investment, while Pure Storage FlashBlade's setup cost tends to be higher, reflecting its premium positioning and advanced capabilities.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon)
4.5 out of 5
Dell PowerScale excels in data protection, scalability, and granularity, appealing to those needing robust management features. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade emphasizes performance and ease of use, ideal for AI workloads. High costs and pricing are factors for both.
Download Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) has a higher setup cost compared to Pure Storage FlashBlade, which offers a more competitive pricing structure for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) has a higher setup cost compared to Pure Storage FlashBlade, which offers a more competitive pricing structure for initial deployment.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell Unity XT
4.2 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell Unity XT
4.2 out of 5
Dell Unity XT is recognized for robust performance and cost-efficiency, attracting budget-conscious users. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade excels with high-speed performance and advanced data capabilities, appealing to those needing premium features and willing to invest more.
Download Dell Unity XT vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
The Dell Unity XT setup cost is often highlighted as affordable and straightforward, whereas Pure Storage FlashBlade has a higher, albeit flexible, initial setup cost. Dell Unity XT users appreciate the simplicity, while FlashBlade users value the flexibility despite the higher cost.
View comparison
Pricing
The Dell Unity XT setup cost is often highlighted as affordable and straightforward, whereas Pure Storage FlashBlade has a higher, albeit flexible, initial setup cost. Dell Unity XT users appreciate the simplicity, while FlashBlade users value the flexibility despite the higher cost.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
IBM FlashSystem
4.1 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
IBM FlashSystem
4.1 out of 5
IBM FlashSystem offers high performance, scalability, and reliability, making it ideal for those prioritizing these features. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides simplicity, advanced data services, and integration, appealing to tech buyers seeking a sleek, feature-rich solution with strong long-term value.
Download IBM FlashSystem vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
IBM FlashSystem has an initial setup cost that users described as moderate, while Pure Storage FlashBlade is noted for a higher initial setup cost. IBM FlashSystem setup is straightforward, contrasting with Pure Storage FlashBlade's more complex setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM FlashSystem has an initial setup cost that users described as moderate, while Pure Storage FlashBlade is noted for a higher initial setup cost. IBM FlashSystem setup is straightforward, contrasting with Pure Storage FlashBlade's more complex setup requirements.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
HPE Alletra Storage
4.5 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade is distinguished by its scalability, speed, and robust performance. In comparison, HPE Alletra Storage attracts attention for its comprehensive feature set, including cloud integration. Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a straightforward deployment, while HPE Alletra Storage is noted for advanced analytics and long-term value.
Download HPE Alletra Storage vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade has a lower setup cost than HPE Alletra Storage, which makes it more attractive for budget-conscious buyers. HPE Alletra Storage, while more expensive to set up, provides advanced features that justify the higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade has a lower setup cost than HPE Alletra Storage, which makes it more attractive for budget-conscious buyers. HPE Alletra Storage, while more expensive to set up, provides advanced features that justify the higher initial investment.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell ECS
4.1 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell ECS
4.1 out of 5
Dell ECS offers scalability and flexibility, appealing to cost-conscious enterprises with its pricing and support advantages. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade excels with a high-performance architecture, catering to buyers seeking rapid data processing and quick deployment alongside effective customer service.
Download Dell ECS vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Dell ECS has a lower setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers advanced features at a higher initial price, appealing to enterprises seeking high-performance storage solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS has a lower setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers advanced features at a higher initial price, appealing to enterprises seeking high-performance storage solutions.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
VAST Data
5.0 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
VAST Data
5.0 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade is known for performance, offering high throughput and scalability. In comparison, VAST Data excels with advanced technologies, such as persistent memory and QLC flash. Pure Storage FlashBlade shines in customer service, while VAST Data's higher cost delivers superior ROI and features.
Download Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. VAST Data Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade features moderate setup costs complemented by robust performance, while VAST Data presents higher initial installation expenses with significant long-term savings potential for larger scales.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade features moderate setup costs complemented by robust performance, while VAST Data presents higher initial installation expenses with significant long-term savings potential for larger scales.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
4.3 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
4.3 out of 5
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is valued for cost-effectiveness and support. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade offers advanced features and performance, justifying its higher price. HPE 3PAR StoreServ provides robust data management, while Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in high-speed performance and unstructured data handling.
Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
HPE 3PAR StoreServ has a moderate setup cost with some initial investment required, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more streamlined and lower setup cost experience.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE 3PAR StoreServ has a moderate setup cost with some initial investment required, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more streamlined and lower setup cost experience.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Huawei OceanStor Dorado
4.3 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in scalability and performance, ideal for environments needing rapid data access. In comparison, Huawei OceanStor Dorado offers advanced AI capabilities and robust security, excelling in high-demand scenarios. Pure Storage offers cost-effectiveness, while Huawei delivers long-term ROI despite higher setup costs.
Download Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more cost-effective setup, while Huawei OceanStor Dorado's setup cost is higher, reflecting its premium positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more cost-effective setup, while Huawei OceanStor Dorado's setup cost is higher, reflecting its premium positioning.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform
4.2 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers advanced data management and scalability with lower initial costs and reliable support. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides exceptional speed, integration, and analytics with a smoother deployment process and long-term value. Hitachi's cost-effectiveness contrasts with Pure Storage's superior performance and features.
Download Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform setup cost is high, while Pure Storage FlashBlade has a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform setup cost is high, while Pure Storage FlashBlade has a more cost-effective setup.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
HPE Primera
4.1 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
HPE Primera
4.1 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade is noted for exceptional speed and high performance, especially in data analytics and AI workloads. In comparison, HPE Primera stands out for its sophisticated data protection and management. Pure Storage FlashBlade focuses on broader compatibility, while HPE Primera emphasizes ease of use and update frequency.
Download HPE Primera vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade has a lower setup cost, making it a cost-effective option, while HPE Primera offers higher setup investments, reflecting its enterprise-grade features.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade has a lower setup cost, making it a cost-effective option, while HPE Primera offers higher setup investments, reflecting its enterprise-grade features.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
HPE Nimble Storage
4.5 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
HPE Nimble Storage
4.5 out of 5
HPE Nimble Storage is praised for affordability, simplicity, and superior support. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade is valued for advanced features, exceptional performance, and multi-cloud integration. Tech buyers favor HPE Nimble for cost-effectiveness and reliability, while Pure Storage attracts those seeking high performance and scalability.
Download HPE Nimble Storage vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
HPE Nimble Storage has a lower setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE Nimble Storage has a lower setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more comprehensive feature set.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
4.4 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in pricing and support. In comparison, Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) is favored for its feature set, suggesting it provides better value for its price. Nutanix has a slight edge due to its comprehensive management features. Pure Storage stands out slightly better in customer support praise.
Download Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a straightforward setup with minimal upfront costs, while Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) may involve higher initial expenses for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a straightforward setup with minimal upfront costs, while Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) may involve higher initial expenses for deployment.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Qumulo
3.9 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Qumulo
3.9 out of 5
Qumulo impresses tech buyers with its competitive pricing, robust analytics, and hybrid scalability. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade attracts those seeking advanced features and high performance for unstructured data. Qumulo's strong support and deployment ease further benefit budget-focused environments.
Download Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Qumulo Report
Qumulo has a cost-effective initial setup, while Pure Storage FlashBlade involves a more complex and higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qumulo has a cost-effective initial setup, while Pure Storage FlashBlade involves a more complex and higher initial investment.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
NetApp StorageGRID
4.2 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
NetApp StorageGRID
4.2 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in seamless deployment and ease of use with advanced data reduction features. In comparison, NetApp StorageGRID offers comprehensive data management and tiering, advantageous for large-scale, cloud-enabled storage environments. FlashBlade appeals for high performance, while StorageGRID favors complex data configurations.
Download NetApp StorageGRID vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade has a straightforward setup cost, while NetApp StorageGRID involves higher initial expenses and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade has a straightforward setup cost, while NetApp StorageGRID involves higher initial expenses and complexity.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Scality RING
4.1 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Scality RING
4.1 out of 5
Scality RING offers cost-effective storage with strong customer support, suitable for businesses focusing on budget. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides advanced technology and high-speed performance, appealing to enterprises prioritizing efficiency despite higher costs. Scality's flexibility contrasts with Pure's emphasis on performance.
Download Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Scality RING Report
Scality RING offers a more cost-effective setup experience, while Pure Storage FlashBlade provides a straightforward, albeit higher-priced setup. Notably, the cost difference significantly highlights the variance in initial investment between the two products.
View comparison
Pricing
Scality RING offers a more cost-effective setup experience, while Pure Storage FlashBlade provides a straightforward, albeit higher-priced setup. Notably, the cost difference significantly highlights the variance in initial investment between the two products.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series
3.9 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade focuses on high-speed data processing and scalability. In comparison, Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series emphasizes versatility and advanced data management tools. Pure Storage FlashBlade is cost-effective, while Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series offers extensive features that justify its higher cost.
Download Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade has a higher setup cost, whereas Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series offers a more budget-friendly installation. Pure Storage FlashBlade stands out for its premium price tag, contrasting sharply with the cost-effective Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade has a higher setup cost, whereas Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series offers a more budget-friendly installation. Pure Storage FlashBlade stands out for its premium price tag, contrasting sharply with the cost-effective Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Cloudian HyperStore
4.3 out of 5
Cloudian HyperStore appeals to tech buyers with cost-effective scalability and S3 compatibility. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade focuses on high-performance analytics and seamless AI integration, making it ideal for those prioritizing cutting-edge efficiency over cost.
Download Cloudian HyperStore vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Cloudian HyperStore offers a lower setup cost compared to the higher setup cost of Pure Storage FlashBlade, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudian HyperStore offers a lower setup cost compared to the higher setup cost of Pure Storage FlashBlade, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Tintri VMstore T7000
4.7 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 offers strong VM-level analytics and automation, enhancing management efficiency. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides high performance, scalability, and robust native data protection. Tech buyers might choose Tintri for cost-effectiveness or Pure Storage FlashBlade for advanced features and superior scalability.
Download Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
Tintri VMstore T7000 has higher setup costs, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more affordable initial setup. Tintri prioritizes advanced features, but Pure Storage balances cost-efficiency and performance.
View comparison
Pricing
Tintri VMstore T7000 has higher setup costs, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more affordable initial setup. Tintri prioritizes advanced features, but Pure Storage balances cost-efficiency and performance.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Hitachi Content Platform
4.2 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in performance and simplicity, offering SSD storage and high throughput. In comparison, Hitachi Content Platform emphasizes robust features like deduplication and encryption. Tech buyers may prefer Pure for speed and ease, while Hitachi provides comprehensive data management.
Download Hitachi Content Platform vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, making it cost-effective, whereas Hitachi Content Platform involves higher setup expenses due to its complex configuration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, making it cost-effective, whereas Hitachi Content Platform involves higher setup expenses due to its complex configuration needs.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
NetApp NVMe AFF A800
4.4 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade is known for its ease of deployment and high performance. In comparison, NetApp NVMe AFF A800 offers advanced features and better data management. FlashBlade is simpler but needs better integration, while NetApp requires a technical approach but provides substantial long-term value.
Download NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers competitive setup costs, while NetApp NVMe AFF A800 tends to have higher initial expenses. Pure Storage highlights cost-effectiveness, whereas NetApp emphasizes performance and enterprise capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers competitive setup costs, while NetApp NVMe AFF A800 tends to have higher initial expenses. Pure Storage highlights cost-effectiveness, whereas NetApp emphasizes performance and enterprise capabilities.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell XtremIO
3.8 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell XtremIO
3.8 out of 5
Dell XtremIO offers notable pricing and support advantages. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade stands out with superior features, earning it consideration as a premium product. Features and support of Dell XtremIO provide practical benefits, whereas Pure Storage FlashBlade's advanced capabilities give it a competitive edge.
Download Dell XtremIO vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Dell XtremIO has a lower setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers scalable setup pricing. Pure Storage FlashBlade may present a higher initial investment compared to Dell XtremIO.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell XtremIO has a lower setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers scalable setup pricing. Pure Storage FlashBlade may present a higher initial investment compared to Dell XtremIO.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Amazon FSx
4.2 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Amazon FSx
4.2 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers high-performance storage with scalability, suitable for on-premises deployments seeking total cost efficiency. In comparison, Amazon FSx provides advanced cloud-native features and seamless AWS integration, appealing to enterprises seeking flexible, feature-rich solutions for cloud environments.
Download Amazon FSx vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade setup cost is generally higher due to its premium hardware features, while Amazon FSx offers a more cost-effective entry point with scalable pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade setup cost is generally higher due to its premium hardware features, while Amazon FSx offers a more cost-effective entry point with scalable pricing options.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays
4.3 out of 5

NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays are lauded for speed, reliability, and straightforward integration, making them a strong contender for tech buyers prioritizing performance and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade offers advanced performance and powerful data management, appealing to those seeking exceptional features and strong ROI.

Download NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays have a higher setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers more competitive pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays have a higher setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers more competitive pricing.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Huawei FusionStorage
3.8 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade attracts tech buyers for its rapid data processing and efficient workload management. In comparison, Huawei FusionStorage appeals due to its scalability and comprehensive feature set, offering substantial long-term value despite higher initial costs and a complex deployment process.
Download Huawei FusionStorage vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Pure Storage FlashBlade requires a significant initial investment, while Huawei FusionStorage offers a more budget-friendly setup cost. The higher setup cost of FlashBlade contrasts with FusionStorage's affordability, emphasizing the price difference in initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashBlade requires a significant initial investment, while Huawei FusionStorage offers a more budget-friendly setup cost. The higher setup cost of FlashBlade contrasts with FusionStorage's affordability, emphasizing the price difference in initial expenditure.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
DDN IntelliFlash
3.8 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
DDN IntelliFlash
3.8 out of 5
DDN IntelliFlash offers cost-effectiveness and strong support. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides advanced features, justifying a higher price. DDN IntelliFlash's hybrid capabilities make it reliable, while Pure Storage FlashBlade's scalable architecture ensures high throughput for data-intensive applications, making each suited for different needs.
Download DDN IntelliFlash vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
DDN IntelliFlash offers a more affordable setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing a significant difference in setup expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
DDN IntelliFlash offers a more affordable setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing a significant difference in setup expenses between the two solutions.
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
DDN Storage Fusion Architecture NVMe
1 out of 5

DDN Storage Fusion Architecture® (SFA®) appliances are purpose-built to deliver scalable flash performance and capacity to flexibly meet your changing business demands. The SFA NVMe platforms deliver 100% NVMe storage with multiple high-speed connectivity options.

View comparison
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Superna
1 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Superna
1 out of 5
Superna provides robust data protection use cases offering efficient backup and disaster recovery. Users appreciate its comprehensive cloud management and automation features. However, there is room for improving its integration with other systems and refining certain technical support aspects for enhanced user experience.
View comparison
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
StoneFly SCVM
1 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
StoneFly SCVM
1 out of 5

SCVM™ Overview: Software Defined Storage Virtualization Software. StoneFly SCVM™ (Storage Concentrator Virtual Machine) enables data center owners to make the most of their data storage infrastructure. ... SCVM is a Software Defined Storage (SDS) solution which means that there is no dependency on specific manufacturers.

View comparison

Related categories

File and Object Storage
All-Flash Storage
Software Defined Storage (SDS)