Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo

Pure Storage FlashBlade pros and cons

Vendor: Pure Storage
4.4 out of 5
181 followers
Start review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Pure Storage FlashBlade is easy to deploy and manage, simplifying storage tasks and capacity management.
Speed, ease of use, and excellent performance are significant features of Pure Storage FlashBlade.
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers seamless integration, especially with VMware, and enhances backup reliability.
Pure Storage FlashBlade is noted for its scalability, fast performance, and low latency.
Cost-effectiveness and significant time savings are benefits associated with Pure Storage FlashBlade.

CONS

Pure Storage Orchestrator poses challenges, as users desire more influence in feature development for specific use cases.
Pure Storage FlashBlade's deduplication performance falls short of initial expectations, posing a challenge for users.
Public cloud integration and hybrid solutions need improvement, and better cloud feature integration is desired.
The cost of Pure Storage FlashBlade is high, and improvements are needed in licensing fees and price per terabyte.
Technical support has degraded, with delayed problem-solving and inadequate responsiveness, requiring improvements.
 

Pure Storage FlashBlade Pros review quotes

Eric Black - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 15, 2024
The performance of FlashBlade is excellent. It does not necessarily leverage the SOS API that some of the newer products leverage, but I found its speed pretty much on par and comparable. It is fast, and it does what it is supposed to do.
reviewer2587263 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 22, 2024
FlashBlade offers low latency, high throughput, and seamless scalability.
PM
Apr 25, 2022
The snapshots, replication, and the ability to have immutable blades are the most valuable features. You're putting data snapshots out in those blades, and they cannot be touched. Its performance is great.
Learn what your peers think about Pure Storage FlashBlade. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Pandurangan Parisa - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 22, 2024
The most valuable features of FlashBlade include its replication capabilities, reports, and easy allocation. Everything is user-friendly.
Solution3f8e - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 3, 2019
The most valuable features include the ease of implementation, ease of use and the speed that you can do backup and recovery on.
PP
Jun 25, 2025
Approximately 40% to 50% of my time is saved using Pure Storage FlashBlade compared to different products.
VpOfEngic9de - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 10, 2018
The initial setup was straightforward. If you know how to plug in power and network you're pretty much qualified. They were on site to configure the network, the box to fit into our network architecture. Other than that, we self-managed from there.
reviewer1360377 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 24, 2021
The product is scalable and easy to expand.
Meesam Raza - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 25, 2024
Among its most appealing features are its ease of handling and minimal maintenance requirements.
MK
Oct 6, 2022
What I like best about Pure Storage FlashBlade is its object storage functionality, plus it has fast underlying hardware. Pure Storage FlashBlade is also very stable. I find its stability one of its valuable features.
 

Pure Storage FlashBlade Cons review quotes

Eric Black - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 15, 2024
The only thing I feel FlashBlade is missing is the SOS API. If it had SOS API, that would put it well over the top.
reviewer2587263 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 22, 2024
To improve FlashBlade, some analysts suggest enhancing its handling of relational database management systems and SQL queries.
PM
Apr 25, 2022
It usually comes down to just what you hit and the value you're getting when you spend the money and license the products. I would always go, "If you want to make things better, lower your price and make your licensing simpler." There's always an opportunity around that.
Learn what your peers think about Pure Storage FlashBlade. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Pandurangan Parisa - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 22, 2024
Recently, while upgrading the version code, one of the controllers failed. Replacing the controller took between 14 to 20 days.
Solution3f8e - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 3, 2019
In terms of scalability, it doesn't expand out quite as robustly as some of the others, but it covers 90% of the market in what it does.
PP
Jun 25, 2025
In terms of technical support, the experience has been mixed. The support is done through email and is not that great, making it a very problematic area I've been dealing with for over four years.
VpOfEngic9de - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 10, 2018
The Pure Storage Orchestrator is our biggest pain point at the moment. If we can have more say in future developments of feature sets that we will need to support for our use case, that would be pretty beneficial to us.
reviewer1360377 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 24, 2021
I want efficiency. FlashBlade doesn't have efficiency now.
Meesam Raza - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 25, 2024
We initially encountered challenges with the assembly process due to issues with the documentation required during setup, an area where Pure Storage needs improvement.
MK
Oct 6, 2022
An area for improvement in Pure Storage FlashBlade is its price. It could be reduced. The technical support for Pure Storage FlashBlade also needs improvement. It used to be good, with more experienced engineers. Nowadays, it isn't, and it takes longer for support to solve problems.