Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp Snapshot vs OpenText Availability​ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Snapshot
Ranking in Data Replication
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Availability​
Ranking in Data Replication
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of NetApp Snapshot is 17.9%, down from 23.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Availability​ is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar13 - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently complete large database snapshots quickly for reliable backup
The most valuable feature of NetApp Snapshot is its ability to complete a sixty-terabyte database snapshot in less than three minutes. This efficiency means we do not have to manage tape backups, which are time-consuming, and it uses less storage as snapshots are compressed. NetApp Snapshot is also easy to restore or copy to another location for disaster recovery. Overall, it has helped us meet our service level agreements due to its performance.
Rias Majeed - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to run multiple jobs to multiple locations simultaneously and offers quick recovery times
It was a very good product. It is real-time synchronization. It is a really beautiful product line. Once it is synchronized, it is a bit-level synchronization across the VPN. And the one beauty I really liked about the product line is you can run multiple jobs to multiple locations simultaneously. Usually, whether it’s electronic or any other solution, you finish one job, and then it goes for the second replication job, not simultaneously. In Carbonite Availability, you can have one DR service standby server in the head office, another one across the VPN at another DR site, and another one at a third site, like in the cloud. And all these three jobs will be going simultaneously once the initial synchronization is completed. Like, if you delete here, it just deletes everywhere. That means it’s a bit-level synchronization. That beauty, I cannot find in any other product line. It is real-time synchronization. It is high availability. That means if you delete something here, it deletes everywhere. That is the difference.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has a user-friendly interface."
"The replication and SV protocol features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of NetApp Snapshot is its ease of management."
"You never have to worry about maintaining millions of files stored across several thousands of virtual machines."
"NetApp Snapshot's most valuable features are the snapshot capabilities, you can take snaps of shared directories, files, and VMs."
"One of the best features in the industry is that data snapshots can be synchronise for database consistency."
"The most important feature to us is creating live snapshots without impacting user access to the file. NetApp's processes are transparent to users and allow us to create point-in-time snapshots, enabling us to replicate that data into the cloud in real time without any impact."
"SnapMirror and Snapshot are both very reliable products."
"We have tested up to a terabyte of data, and it is doing very well."
 

Cons

"I would like some sort of notification that lets me know when a snapshot is done or not done."
"The initial setup process of NetApp Snapshot is not easy and needs improvement."
"One area for improvement is enhancing the compression capabilities further to minimize storage requirements, especially given its costs with Oracle integration."
"I would like to see cloud features added to the next release of this solution."
"The next release should include developments on the step center for purpose or bandwidth."
"If your data is more dynamic and changes frequently, you need more granular retention levels and need to save it for a longer duration, then this becomes a real challenge."
"The UI is probably their biggest weakness. There are always glitches in the HTML UI."
"The solution could include more databases and make it accessible to the DBAs. The automation process should be run in a way where it could be run from the database itself."
"The only thing I didn’t like about this is when you do a failover or failback again."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not too expensive."
"The price of NetApp Snapshot depends on the use case. They charge by how much data you need, the capability, and for snap licenses."
"If there is a way to save more on the number of snapshots, it should be included in the next release."
"As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose."
"Snapshot is free and comes with the NetApp storage software. It's purely free of cost."
"The price of the solution is reasonable but could improve. However, if you are in a country that has a poor currency then the price will be considered expensive."
"The price of this solution is fair."
"NetApp Snapshot is expensive since you need to buy an additional premium license for it which is an extra cost over the payments made for NetApp...The license works during the entire life cycle of NetApp Snapshot."
"Price-wise, it’s a bit expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
24%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What method of data replication does NetApp Snapshot use?
Here's a breakdown of how the data replication by NetApp Snapshot works: it's through the snapshot replication method. What does that mean? Well, in simple words, the software creates copies of dat...
What is the storage scale of NetApp Snapshot?
Last time I checked, the NetApp Snapshot data replication software could go up to 255 snapshot copies. I'm not sure how familiar you are with similar software, but that's a pretty good number. It g...
Will NetApp Snapshot recover data in an emergency?
Well yes, the snapshots that NetApp Snapshot creates are your backup. But then there's also their feature for advanced backup. This allows you to copy backups to offline locations and also make arc...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Availability?
Price-wise, it’s a bit expensive. But, again, when I compare it to the enterprise segment, it is not that costly because you understand what the solution you are taking is. You’re not taking a back...
What needs improvement with Carbonite Availability?
The only thing I didn’t like about this is when you do a failover or failback again. That was the only slow process. But otherwise, it is, like one way it runs beautifully.
What is your primary use case for Carbonite Availability?
We had applications that are file servers. The file server, and then we had the Oracle application. Then we have ERP software. It’s the full server, physical server to virtual, physical to physical...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mazda
Quantitative Investment Management, Peak 10, KEB Hana Bank USA
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.