Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp Snapshot vs OpenText Availability​ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Snapshot
Ranking in Data Replication
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Availability​
Ranking in Data Replication
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of NetApp Snapshot is 5.6%, down from 23.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Availability​ is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
NetApp Snapshot5.6%
OpenText Availability​1.7%
Other92.7%
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Tanveer Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technical Office at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Snapshots have enabled us to restore critical data quickly and confidently after unexpected changes
The functions or features I have found most valuable in NetApp Snapshot are that it is easy to do and takes very little time. The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something. It gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else. I use NetApp's WAFL architecture as it is their way of doing things, how to save the files and everything else. It is built-in. You cannot avoid WAFL when you use NetApp. Regarding the integration of NetApp Snapshot with applications and workloads, we have NetApp Snapshot integrated with our OpenStack platform.
Rias Majeed - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Exceed NetSec LLC
Ability to run multiple jobs to multiple locations simultaneously and offers quick recovery times
It was a very good product. It is real-time synchronization. It is a really beautiful product line. Once it is synchronized, it is a bit-level synchronization across the VPN. And the one beauty I really liked about the product line is you can run multiple jobs to multiple locations simultaneously. Usually, whether it’s electronic or any other solution, you finish one job, and then it goes for the second replication job, not simultaneously. In Carbonite Availability, you can have one DR service standby server in the head office, another one across the VPN at another DR site, and another one at a third site, like in the cloud. And all these three jobs will be going simultaneously once the initial synchronization is completed. Like, if you delete here, it just deletes everywhere. That means it’s a bit-level synchronization. That beauty, I cannot find in any other product line. It is real-time synchronization. It is high availability. That means if you delete something here, it deletes everywhere. That is the difference.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"SnapMirror and Snapshot are both very reliable products."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the repurposing and backup features."
"You never have to worry about protecting your virtual machines."
"NetApp Snapshot's most valuable features are the snapshot capabilities, you can take snaps of shared directories, files, and VMs."
"This is a very mature product that does exactly what it needs to in taking temporary pictures of data states."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It doesn't occupy a lot of space and is very easy to use once you schedule the snapshots."
"The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something; it gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else."
"We have tested up to a terabyte of data, and it is doing very well."
 

Cons

"If your data is more dynamic and changes frequently, you need more granular retention levels and need to save it for a longer duration, then this becomes a real challenge."
"The initial setup of NetApp Snapshot is not straightforward. It's not something that you can do just by clicking on the next step button. It has to be designed and it has to be implemented according to your network capabilities and the use case scenario."
"The next release should include developments on the step center for purpose or bandwidth."
"NetApp Snapshot's price could improve to allow them to capture more market shares."
"In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost."
"The information on this panel doesn't always give good information; sometimes, the disk space left gives wrong information, and we have to go in the SSH with the console to control this."
"The licensing cost could be improved."
"In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost."
"The only thing I didn’t like about this is when you do a failover or failback again."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable but could improve. However, if you are in a country that has a poor currency then the price will be considered expensive."
"The price of this solution is fair."
"If there is a way to save more on the number of snapshots, it should be included in the next release."
"As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose."
"NetApp Snapshot is expensive since you need to buy an additional premium license for it which is an extra cost over the payments made for NetApp...The license works during the entire life cycle of NetApp Snapshot."
"It's not too expensive."
"Snapshot is free and comes with the NetApp storage software. It's purely free of cost."
"The price of NetApp Snapshot depends on the use case. They charge by how much data you need, the capability, and for snap licenses."
"Price-wise, it’s a bit expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What method of data replication does NetApp Snapshot use?
Here's a breakdown of how the data replication by NetApp Snapshot works: it's through the snapshot replication method. What does that mean? Well, in simple words, the software creates copies of dat...
What is the storage scale of NetApp Snapshot?
Last time I checked, the NetApp Snapshot data replication software could go up to 255 snapshot copies. I'm not sure how familiar you are with similar software, but that's a pretty good number. It g...
Will NetApp Snapshot recover data in an emergency?
Well yes, the snapshots that NetApp Snapshot creates are your backup. But then there's also their feature for advanced backup. This allows you to copy backups to offline locations and also make arc...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Availability?
Price-wise, it’s a bit expensive. But, again, when I compare it to the enterprise segment, it is not that costly because you understand what the solution you are taking is. You’re not taking a back...
What needs improvement with Carbonite Availability?
The only thing I didn’t like about this is when you do a failover or failback again. That was the only slow process. But otherwise, it is, like one way it runs beautifully.
What is your primary use case for Carbonite Availability?
We had applications that are file servers. The file server, and then we had the Oracle application. Then we have ERP software. It’s the full server, physical server to virtual, physical to physical...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mazda
Quantitative Investment Management, Peak 10, KEB Hana Bank USA
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: January 2026.
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.