NetScaler vs SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager comparison

"The solution can be configured very granularly and has good control over security."

"The program is easy to install and to set up."

"Available on any device and can be accessed on a wide area network."

"Load balancing, cache redirection, content switching, all connected with traffic management."

"I like app flows and custom flows. They integrate with multiple flows."

"Content filtering, security layer, and application customization features are the most valuable."

"We like the periodic upgrades and backups, also made via ADMs, and it makes our environment much more robust and reliable."

"The most valuable feature of Citrix ADC is its ease of use."

"SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager improves the mean time to repair significantly, bringing measurable benefits to customers."

"SolarWinds NCM provides updates on the status of your network infrastructure. If any issues arise, such as a link failure or a device going offline, you will receive notifications and alerts. Additionally, if someone unplugs a cable, SolarWinds NCM will detect it. It also features a Topology Mapper that displays the connectivity of your network devices, giving you a visual representation of the network's structure. With SolarWinds NCM, you have a clear understanding of what's happening within your network and can generate comprehensive reports."

"Configuration pushing, upgrade capabilities, job backup, configuration backup, and real-time configuration change monitoring are highly beneficial features of SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager."

"What's nice with NCM is you can set up policies that you can then check against the configs to ensure that your device configs adhere to a baseline or standard that you've set in place."

"The configuration compliance aspect of SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager allows for easy comparison of configuration settings across branches, ensuring adherence to security guidelines and best practices. Automation capabilities have greatly impacted workflows, enabling tasks such as configuration backups, template deployment, and firmware upgrades to be automated, thereby streamlining processes and saving time. Compliance reporting features provide valuable insights into network compliance, offering pre-built security audit reports and customizable options to meet specific requirements."

"The installation is straightforward."

"The solution's view is very nice, and they have a great customized dashboard."

"We push all our configurations to the servers with ease and the logs capture almost all the transactions needed for an internal audit."

"The GUI should be improved."

"There are some features which are missing.​"

"Too many bugs in the software and it's always difficult when you need to update."

"The vendor provides frequent patches, however, the security of the website has room for improvement."

"The solution is a bit more expensive than some of the available solutions in this region. One solution in particular that I noticed was cheaper was Kemp."

"The product could be improved by making it easier to use and easier to implement."

"We have issues with the certificates. All authorization processes need certificates, however, every three months we needed to change certificates. This process iss complicated for us because Citrix does not have a not user-friendly interface and does not off user-friendly services. This needs a lot of improvement."

"I will try to migrate all the tools to the cloud because there is more lab and more VPN scalability available in the cloud. It is not available on-premises."

"The network flow is a problem for this solution."

"The third-party plugins available in the solution could improve. I have received some issues with the templates."

"I would like to see more integration tools. Something like dialysis, for example."

"It would be great if they include a network service manager, network performance manager, or a privileged assessment in the next release."

"Releasing a product compatible with operating systems other than Windows would be advantageous."

"I'd like to see additional features like support for devices that don't use CLI for configuration backups, expanded inventory support for other vendors beyond Cisco, and compatibility with newer SD WAN devices. These enhancements would further improve the product's versatility and utility for users. we hope for future enhancements, especially in supporting security devices that lack CLI backup options."

"There are certain limitations of node-related monitoring"

"When it comes to the way of managing the network devices, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager should provide the simplest way that devices can relate to the server. For example, when we want to get the devices on board, we go by SSH to make the SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager create the connectivity with the device. After that, we pull the configuration. It would be helpful if they could combine both so that everything will be done in one step."

"You can do CapEx and then a yearly monthly fee, or you can do a subscription model, whether that's one month, month-to-month, or three-year subscription model."

"The licenses for this product are payable as a yearly subscription, and carry a high price-point. The subscription scheme is quite complicated, and costs will increase with each additional feature that is required, outside of the basic setup."

"It is very pricey, but we get it. If you need the best, money shouldn't be a problem."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten since it is expensive."

"Citrix NetScaler's pricing is slightly above average but not overly expensive. I would consider F5 BIG IP to be the most expensive, Citrix NetScaler to be the second most expensive, and then Kemp Load Balancer to be the third."

"The license for Citrix NetScaler is on an annual basis and it is reasonably priced."

"We have all the features and functions of Citrix because we have a premium license."

"The solution's pricing is very high compared to its competitors."

"The price of the solution is high compared to other solutions."

"The pricing is good."

"There is a license for the use of this solution and it is priced well, there is a lot of value for the money."

"Available at a moderate price"

"We have to pay additionally for its support and maintenance."

"Pricing is reasonable and competitive."

"With a minimal bundle, we pay about $3000 a year in licensing costs. If you have multiple devices in your network, you must buy the bundle, which is 100% identical for your infrastructure. If you have 15 devices, you need 15 licenses, for example. That's one bundle. You don't pay for anything over and above that."

"Additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee are inevitable."