Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker comparison

Nintex and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0, while ProcessMaker is ranked #36. Nintex holds a 1.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,991 Views
1,974 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

829 Views
771 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and ProcessMaker compete in business process management, each with unique advantages. Nintex is more flexible with integrations, while ProcessMaker offers cost-effectiveness and intuitive design.

Features: Nintex Process Platform supports a wide range of automation tools with seamless integration to platforms like Microsoft 365 and Salesforce. It’s ideal for organizations needing strong connectivity. ProcessMaker provides efficient process mapping tools and a low-code development environment. Its focus is on providing accessible and straightforward solutions. Nintex emphasizes integration capabilities, whereas ProcessMaker prioritizes user-friendly functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ProcessMaker offers cloud-based deployment, simplifying installation with minimal IT needs. Its customer service is responsive and helpful. Nintex offers both cloud and on-premise deployment but may take longer to set up. It has extensive documentation and troubleshooting resources. The ease of cloud deployment is a highlight for ProcessMaker, while Nintex benefits from dual deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform usually involves higher initial costs, focusing on long-term value through integrations and advanced features. ProcessMaker presents a budget-friendly pricing model, enabling faster ROI for organizations. While Nintex justifies its pricing with robust capabilities, ProcessMaker attracts budget-conscious buyers by balancing affordability with essential functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (22nd), Workload Automation (21st)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.6%
ProcessMaker	0.9%
Other	97.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is very good."

"The technical support provided by Nintex is very helpful."

"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."

"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."

"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."

"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."

"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."

"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

Cons

"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."

"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

"It's very tedious to manage."

"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"

"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."

"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Flowable vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 35% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs ProcessMaker

Compared 11% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker

Compared 8% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

January 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Overview

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

February 2026

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.