Norton Small Business vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

Why PeerSpot?

NortonLifeLock and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. NortonLifeLock is ranked #42, while OpenText is ranked #32. NortonLifeLock holds a 0.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of NortonLifeLock users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Norton Small Business are competing in the endpoint protection market. Norton Small Business appears to have the upper hand due to its robust feature set and perceived value.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides advanced threat protection, endpoint visibility, and integration capabilities for enterprise environments. Norton Small Business offers intuitive setup, device management, and malware protection tailored for small business needs.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection could benefit from a less complex deployment process, more affordable pricing, and enhanced usability for non-enterprise users. Norton Small Business may improve by adding more advanced features, expanding integration capabilities, and enhancing scalability for larger organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is known for a more complex deployment process but offers strong customer support. Norton Small Business is praised for its easy installation and responsive customer service, making it preferable for smaller companies.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection has higher upfront costs but promises long-term ROI through comprehensive endpoint management. Norton Small Business offers competitive pricing and significant ROI by safeguarding multiple devices efficiently, making it a cost-effective choice for small businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Norton Small Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Norton Small Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Norton Small Business is 0.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.9%
Norton Small Business	0.9%
Other	93.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

William_Bowers

CEO at Evise.ai

Provides a secure and hassle-free environment

One area where Norton 360 could improve is the constant push for upselling. The notifications urging me to buy additional services, like dark web monitoring or a secure browser, can be overwhelming. It feels like they are trying to sell me more than I actually need. I would prefer a more straightforward approach where essential features are included in the base license without constant prompts to purchase extras. While notifications about actions taken for my security are good, they could be more informative, letting me know exactly what they did to protect me without the upsell pitches. Simplifying the user experience and providing clearer information about the actions taken would make Norton 360 more user-friendly for me.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Traps is quite a stable product. Once it was properly deployed and configured, you have nothing to be worried about."

"Stability is one of the features we like the most."

"Cortex XDR can integrate the firewalls and determine the tendencies of the attacks. It's a new generation antivirus, with protection endpoints and detection response. It is very easy to use and everybody can operate the solution."

"Has great threat detection capabilities."

"Its ability to react to cyber data attacks is awesome. That is pretty much the use of it. What blows your mind is the ability to access your assets remotely and see what is actually going on with them. You can not only see them in a console. You can also react very rapidly to your assets that are compromised."

"The biggest positive impact I see from Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a significant reduction in the number of people required to manage it."

"The solution allows us to make investigations. Other XDR solutions also provide similar capabilities but for investigation, Cortex XDR is better."

"Once you become familiar with it, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a more powerful tool and I would say that I prefer it over MDE because it is a stronger tool for me."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Norton 360 offers the best defense compared to other low-priced antivirus solutions. Its most valuable feature is storage and automatic backup. You can restore materials from the tool's cloud backup. It is encrypted with authentication."

"The most valuable feature of Norton 360 has been its robust notification system."

"The performance is fine."

"The product’s valuable feature is the availability of support services 24/7."

"The solution detects viruses very, very fast."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it offers alerts if I get a spam email."

"It offers diverse features, such as antivirus protection, firewall, identity protection, secure VPN, device backup, password management, parental controls, and performance optimization."

"The solution has good performance."

"Webroot pioneered integration of novel concepts in endpoint protection."

"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."

"Previously, we used a mix of Trend/Sophos/Symantec. Webroot has all their best bits combined into one solution."

"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable."

"The Webroot cloud console is very powerful."

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"Cortex XDR is trickier to configure than other Palo Alto products. This is one area where we are not so satisfied."

"I have faced some issues with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks; there is room for improvement in the sense that certain options prevent us from seeing and segregating data."

"Whenever the tool releases a new version when deploying the product across the organization, I feel like there are some disturbances in the CPU usage after upgrading the tool to the latest version."

"If you compare it to SentinelOne, which has more functionalities and detection capabilities on an open platform, the pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks."

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"It's not an ideal choice for smaller businesses, as you need a minimum of 200 endpoints to even use the solution at all."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"There's a need for enhanced security measures."

"The tool should be easily available in the market and should be cheaper."

"The product should be improved with more storage. Though included in its price, the tool's auto VPN doesn't work at times."

"The tool's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution’s stability could be improved."

"The updates must be less frequent."

"One area where Norton 360 could improve is the constant push for upselling."

"Norton 360’s features for device optimization could be better."

"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."

"We need to know more details about how the virus interacted with the computer."

"Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention."

"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."

"We were attacked by CryptoLock. It didn't protect us in the way we needed to and an attack was able to get through their defenses."

"They should provide more information on the type of cyber attacks."

"Reporting system could be improved."

"One of the biggest pain points is that it's not really ransomware-oriented. They will be able to catch some, but that's where Sentinel One is a better player compared to Webroot."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The solution is cost-effective."

"On a scale of one to ten, if ten is the most expensive and one is the cheapest, I rate the price as nine."

"The price is fairly acceptable."

"It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

"The tool has a yearly licensing."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two ou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's adverti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the con...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs Norton Small Business

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Norton Small Business

Compared 6% of the time

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Norton Small Business

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Norton Small Business

Compared 5% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs Norton Small Business

Compared 4% of the time

More Norton Small Business Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 47% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 3% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 1% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

November 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

October 2026

Download Norton Small Business product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

October 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Norton Small Business provides comprehensive security with reliability for small enterprises, ensuring robust protection and easy management.

Norton Small Business delivers superior security services tailored for small businesses. With rapid issue resolution and constant support, it offers powerful antivirus protection, a reliable firewall, identity protection, secure VPN, and password management. Automatic encrypted backup, parental controls, and spam email alerts further enhance its utility. Users appreciate its seamless integration with dashboards, offering a more consistent and efficient user experience. Although improvements in device optimization and security measures are needed, it stands as a robust option for those seeking reliable security solutions. Some challenges include frequent pop-up ads, pricing concerns, and stability issues.

What are the key features of Norton Small Business?

24/7 Support: Provides immediate assistance whenever required.
Antivirus and Firewall: Offers continuous device protection against threats.
Secure VPN: Ensures safe and encrypted internet browsing.
Password Management: Protects and simplifies password organization.
Automatic Encrypted Backup: Safeguards critical data with secure storage solutions.
Parental Controls: Filters harmful content to protect younger users.
Performance Optimization: Enhances system efficiency by managing resources effectively.

Why should users consider Norton Small Business?

Comprehensive Security Coverage: Encompasses a broad range of security features for total peace of mind.
User Convenience: Easy integration with business management tools contributes to streamlined operations.
Support Assurance: 24/7 support mitigates downtime and enhances reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Delivers robustness expected by smaller enterprises without significant expenses.

Norton Small Business thrives in industries that require a seamless blend of robust security and management simplicity. It supports antivirus protection, identity protection, and seamless data backups, making it ideal for businesses focusing on protecting customer information and ensuring operational continuity.

NortonLifeLock

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

Norton Small Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

September 2026

Free Report: Norton Small Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Norton Small Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Norton Small Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.