No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nozomi Networks vs SCADAfence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (2nd)
SCADAfence
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 15.2%, down from 29.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SCADAfence is 1.8%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks15.2%
SCADAfence1.8%
Other83.0%
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

Apurva Nigam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint
Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation
On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.
reviewer2352084 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Easy to integrate, enhances operational efficiency, and has machine learning capabilities
We are satisfied with the product. We can passively scan the network for anomalies and let it learn through machine learning about the normal state of the network. If it deviates from that, then it is an anomaly. It would give an alert about anomalous behaviors like a cyber attack. The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency. It is easy to integrate the solution with the existing industrial control systems.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."
"Nozomi Networks is an easy-to-use and powerful tool."
"I believe it is the best."
"I chose Nozomi because it is far ahead of other competitors, like Curator and Elastic."
"It brings visibility into the OT environment because most of the enterprises only have methods to check their IT environment."
"It has impacted security operations in a better way."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"This is a good product and I definitely recommend it."
"The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency."
 

Cons

"The solution should include an integration library."
"I would like more customizable options for configurations."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
"Regarding the functionality of Nozomi Networks, the query syntax is very complicated. The syntax of the queries is very complex, so sometimes you will not get what you want."
"We have faced downtimes, crashes, or performance issues with certain implementations."
"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."
"The tool must provide new features similar to Radiflow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."
"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty are on the expensive end of the market, so the client should have those budgets available.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
The potential area of improvement I see for Nozomi Networks is that there are many unknown malwares that cannot be identified because they are not updated in the National Vulnerability Database. Th...
What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?
My main use case for Nozomi Networks is that I have experience with implementation, designing, and configuration.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

SCADAguardian
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Siemens, ABB, Schneider Electric, Mitsubishi, General Electric, Honeywell
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, CyberArk and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.