Okta Customer Identity vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Okta and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Okta is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Ping Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Okta holds a 7.5% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Ping Identity’s 11.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Okta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Okta Customer Identity

Read 16 Okta Customer Identity reviews

782 Views
560 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews

1,199 Views
838 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Okta Customer Identity

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Ping Identity Platform and Okta Customer Identity compete in the identity and access management market. Okta Customer Identity often seems superior due to its comprehensive features that users perceive as worth the price.

Features: Ping Identity Platform is distinguished by its robust security protocols, flexible integration options, and effective multifactor authentication. Okta Customer Identity offers comprehensive identity management, seamless integration with diverse platforms, and efficient scalability.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could enhance its user interface and ease of use while also improving support for complex integrations. Okta Customer Identity could improve its initial cost structure and offer more customization for specific enterprise needs, as well as enhance its support for legacy systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform provides a customizable deployment model with responsive service support. Okta Customer Identity is noted for its straightforward deployment process and efficient customer support, facilitating a smoother onboarding experience.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform offers competitive setup costs and reasonable ROI for businesses focusing on customization and security. Okta is perceived to offer better ROI despite higher initial costs, owing to its comprehensive feature set suited to complex identity management needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Okta Customer Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Okta Customer Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Okta Customer Identity

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (5th), Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Okta Customer Identity is 7.5%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 11.6%, down from 12.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

MiguelPurizaca

IT Manager at Clear Channel

Focus on seamless integration and advanced security management enhances application usage and threat detection across multiple countries

Okta Customer Identity focuses on providing top-notch identity management solutions. One of its most valuable features is its easy integration with various applications through its extensive application directory, offering hundreds or thousands of applications ready to configure. This integration is significantly easier compared to Microsoft Entra ID, where we encountered numerous issues. We particularly value its real-time reporting capabilities. For example, we detected cyberattacks from countries like Russia and Asia and were able to block those IP addresses and configure our system for more security. These advanced security features and reporting capabilities make it easy to manage.

Read full review

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has great multifactor authentication."

"The most valuable feature of this solution for most customers is access management."

"Okta Customer Identity is considered cheaper compared to other tools in the market, such as IBM and CyberArk products."

"There is no password hash saved on the cloud, which is the part that I like the most."

"We primarily use it to manage the community onboarding and offboarding of users, and it's quite a simple solution for that."

"Overall, I would rate Okta Customer Identity a ten."

"It is very seamless."

"The most valuable features of Okta Customer Identity are there is no infrastructure cost, integrated, has plenty of documentation, and is user-friendly."

More Okta Customer Identity pros

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"We use the product to run different reports."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."

"I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

"The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities."

"I work on the application onboarding process because we have multiple customers and get data from different sources."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"I would like to see the provisioning simplified."

"The initial setup could be easier to do."

"Users sometimes have difficulty getting verification codes."

"The product must be provided for free."

"Some limitations in scalability. Each application we work with can be completely different, resulting in highly variable implementation processes."

"This solution would be improved by adding biometrics features."

"In Okta Identity Governance and Okta Privileged Access, some features are still being developed. Integration with Active Directory servers, Cisco routers, and switches is not currently available."

"Okta has a limitation with directory integrations. If you have multiple Active Directory integrations, the user distinguished name (DN) and the manager DN don't get imported properly into the Okta user profile."

More Okta Customer Identity cons

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

"There is room for improvement in the solution, particularly in security."

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

"One significant challenge was ensuring smooth user migration during system upgrades in Ping."

"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay 23 pence (approximately $0.30 USD) per user, annually, for 150,000 users."

"Pricing might be high, but it comes down when the number of people using the product goes up."

"The solution is really expensive."

"The price of the solution is fair for what it offers."

"Okta's pricing is right where it needs to be and right in the middle of the market."

"Okta Customer Identity is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Okta Customer Identity?

Okta has more when it comes to the policy level. It has distinctive features where you can do a mix and combination to have users access applications for various business cases.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Customer Identity?

Okta Customer Identity is considered cheaper compared to other tools in the market, such as IBM and CyberArk products. Further details on costs would require consultation with our sales team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Customer Identity?

In Okta Identity Governance ( /categories/identity-management-im ) and Okta Privileged Access, some features are still being developed. Integration with Active Directory servers, Cisco routers, and...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra External ID vs Okta Customer Identity

Compared 30% of the time

ForgeRock vs Okta Customer Identity

Compared 21% of the time

Auth0 vs Okta Customer Identity

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs Okta Customer Identity

Compared 11% of the time

Salesforce Identity vs Okta Customer Identity

Compared 7% of the time

More Okta Customer Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 21% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 9% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Okta Customer Identity

May 2025

Download Okta Customer Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

May 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Okta Customer Identity is an identity service that enables frictionless experience, speed-to-market, centralized management, and internet-scale security. Okta Customer Identity is developer friendly and secure with minimal custom code.

Okta

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

FedEx, Adobe, National Geographic, Tyson, Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Okta Customer Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2025

Free Report: Okta Customer Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Okta Customer Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Okta Customer Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.