OneLogin by One Identity vs Opal comparison

Why PeerSpot?

One Identity and Opal Security are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. One Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5, while Opal Security is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.5. One Identity holds a 2.9% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Opal Security’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Opal Security users who would recommend it.

OneLogin by One Identity

Read 104 OneLogin by One Identity reviews

13,555 Views
5,015 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Opal

Read 2 Opal reviews

1,225 Views
894 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneLogin by One Identity

Opal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

OneLogin and Opal compete in the identity and access management category. OneLogin has an advantage in pricing and customer service, while Opal stands out with its comprehensive features offering more value.

Features: OneLogin provides multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and robust security measures for a streamlined experience. Opal offers advanced data analytics, automation options, and superior analytical capabilities, catering to data-driven organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin features a straightforward deployment process with extensive customer support for seamless integration. Opal, though reliable, has a steeper learning curve due to its complex feature set.

Pricing and ROI: OneLogin has competitive pricing structures conducive to a favorable ROI for budget-conscious companies. Opal's higher cost is justified by its powerful analytics capabilities and potential long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OneLogin by One Identity vs. Opal Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin by One Identity vs. Opal

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OneLogin by One Identity

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

4th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

3rd

Ranking in Access Management

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

104

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Identity Management (IM) (4th)

Opal

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

10th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

21st

Ranking in Access Management

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of OneLogin by One Identity is 2.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Opal is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin by One Identity	2.9%
Opal	1.0%
Other	96.1%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Pranay Jain

Senior software engineer at Simplify vms

Focused workdays have replaced doomscrolling and now reduce my daily screen time significantly

Opal can be improved in some ways. In the paid version, there are multiple features, but in the freemium version, there are fewer features. The blockage of the application can be more rigorous. Right now, if we play two to three games, then a math game or anything, we are able to remove that lock. It should be more rigorous in some manner, and for some applications, it should be more rigorous. Application-wise rigorousness should be introduced. The different modes are good, but they should be more customizable according to the person. The end goal should meet whatever the objective is, so if the person has used more than six hours, then it should remind the person frequently that this application has used this time and this is an application you should not use. It should give us a timer or some kind of notification that the person will not use it anymore.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I am getting very good feedback from the end users regarding OneLogin, they are very happy and say this experience they are getting with this solution is excellent."

"The single sign-on feature of OneLogin is the most valuable and useful for me, as it allows one-click access to all apps, eliminating password juggling and frustration while providing centralized access control."

"OneLogin provides a seamless end-user experience, and we are receiving very good and positive responses from end-users."

"The outcomes since adopting OneLogin are very positive, saving our time with a reduced workload by 30 to 40 percent, and user provisioning, including onboarding or off-boarding, has become very fast by 60 to 80 percent."

"OneLogin is still the market's most exemplary solution."

"Greatly improved our password security and policies surrounding them."

"Overall, it not only strengthens security but also simplifies the access management process, making daily operations more efficient and manageable."

"We have been able to save sixty-five to seventy percent of time, and we have also seen enhanced security overall."

More OneLogin by One Identity pros

"Previously, my phone usage was around nine hours and fifteen minutes or more, but it has significantly reduced to around six hours and thirty minutes to seven hours, meaning two and a half to three hours has been reduced after using Opal as my primary screen time blocker."

"Opal has positively impacted my organization by reducing stress and increasing effectiveness for all our employees; it works better so all our employees have more time to sleep and they can investigate more."

Cons

"OneLogin by One Identity is strong, but there is room to improve."

"OneLogin can be improved by making the initial setup and configuration process simpler, especially for teams like mine that are new to identity and access management."

"OneLogin needs to improve as sometimes there are glitches in the software."

"The areas that do have room for improvement include a learning curve."

"They have downtime twice a year or once in six months. During the downtime, the SSO page did not come up. When users wanted to get to their email, they were redirected to the OneLogin page, but the page did not come up, and MFA and logins failed. It completely crippled us."

"The mobile app is not best and it could be improved."

"Improving the integration of legacy applications would reduce manual work during implementation."

"The one area for enhancement I can suggest is the initial setup, which requires considerable planning to execute the deployment."

More OneLogin by One Identity cons

"Opal can be improved in some ways."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	140
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	70

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

OneLogin by One Identity can be improved by addressing the responsiveness time for requests, which is a bit slow, as well as the limited API limitation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

My main use case for OneLogin by One Identity involves single sign-on and multi-factor authentication. A specific example of how I use single sign-on and multi-factor authentication with OneLogin b...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

Regarding OneLogin by One Identity's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security make it a pretty secure solution with a lot of integration, so it is a very good solution overall. Regardin...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Opal?

The paid version is a little costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Opal?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opal?

The main use case of Opal for me is to reduce my screen time during my work hours, during my wake-up time, and during my sleeping time to improve my focus and feasibility towards my work and my act...

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Platform vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Identity Manager by One Identity vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin by One Identity Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Opal

Compared 19% of the time

Okta Platform vs Opal

Compared 17% of the time

ConductorOne vs Opal

Compared 12% of the time

Idira IGA vs Opal

Compared 10% of the time

Idira Identity vs Opal

Compared 2% of the time

More Opal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin by One Identity

September 2026

Download OneLogin by One Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

August 2026

Download Opal product report

Also Known As

OneLogin Workforce Identity

No data available

Overview

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Opal is a comprehensive platform for identity access management and compliance automation. It excels in streamlining access control, audit preparation, and compliance tracking. Key features include an intuitive interface, robust security measures, and real-time collaboration, significantly improving organizational efficiency and productivity.

Opal Security

Sample Customers

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin by One Identity vs. Opal

September 2026

Free Report: OneLogin by One Identity vs. Opal

Find out what your peers are saying about OneLogin by One Identity vs. Opal and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OneLogin by One Identity vs. Opal report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, best User Provisioning Software vendors, and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.