Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OneLogin by One Identity based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, and Okta Workforce Identity.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
One Identity Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with One Identity, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
OneLogin excels in integration with numerous SaaS providers, offering straightforward SSO and user provisioning. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID provides robust security features like multifactor authentication, appealing to organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem for comprehensive security and seamless integration.
OneLogin by One Identity typically has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Entra ID, making it budget-friendly for initial deployment. Microsoft Entra ID may involve higher initial investment, but it often includes advanced features.
OneLogin by One Identity typically has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Entra ID, making it budget-friendly for initial deployment. Microsoft Entra ID may involve higher initial investment, but it often includes advanced features.
SailPoint excels in identity governance, offering extensive features and versatility for complex enterprises, though it requires technical expertise and has cost considerations. In comparison, OneLogin focuses on user-friendly access management with efficient cloud deployment, though UI customization and reporting enhancements are needed.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud offers a streamlined setup with competitive initial costs, whereas OneLogin by One Identity provides a more extensive configuration process, potentially leading to higher setup expenses.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud offers a streamlined setup with competitive initial costs, whereas OneLogin by One Identity provides a more extensive configuration process, potentially leading to higher setup expenses.
Okta Workforce Identity excels in Active Directory sync and app management, making it suitable for organizations needing extensive integration and lifecycle management. In comparison, OneLogin's strength lies in its affordable pricing and simplified onboarding, appealing to businesses prioritizing cost-efficiency and straightforward deployment.
Okta Workforce Identity's setup cost tends to run higher upfront, while OneLogin by One Identity offers more competitive initial pricing, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Okta Workforce Identity's setup cost tends to run higher upfront, while OneLogin by One Identity offers more competitive initial pricing, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
OneLogin simplifies identity management with features like SSO and multifactor authentication, ideal for cloud deployments. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator excels in on-premises environments, providing strong integration within the Fortinet ecosystem with robust two-factor authentication and token management.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's setup can be more complex and costly. The differences in setup costs may influence user preferences based on budget and implementation needs.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's setup can be more complex and costly. The differences in setup costs may influence user preferences based on budget and implementation needs.
OneLogin excels in role management and user-friendly features like Desktop SSO. In comparison, Saviynt provides in-depth identity management and integrates complex systems like SAP and AWS. A tech buyer might prefer OneLogin for ease, while Saviynt suits those needing comprehensive identity solutions.
OneLogin by One Identity has a lower setup cost compared to Saviynt's higher setup fees. While OneLogin focuses on cost-effectiveness, Saviynt requires a larger initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing approach.
OneLogin by One Identity has a lower setup cost compared to Saviynt's higher setup fees. While OneLogin focuses on cost-effectiveness, Saviynt requires a larger initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing approach.
OneLogin is favored for ease of use, offering centralized management and effective security features like single sign-on. In comparison, Auth0 appeals to developers needing extensive customization, especially in authentication and API features, making it ideal for those requiring flexibility and social media integration.
OneLogin excels in ease of integration and onboarding, appealing to those seeking streamlined processes. In comparison, Ping Identity offers superior customization and federated identity management, making it ideal for organizations needing flexible security solutions and personalized authentication protocols.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, whereas Ping Identity Platform involves a higher upfront investment, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, whereas Ping Identity Platform involves a higher upfront investment, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
OneLogin by One Identity excels in Active Directory integration and multifactor authentication, appealing to enterprises. In comparison, Google Cloud Identity offers a user-friendly interface with Google Workspace integration but needs enhanced security measures, making it ideal for startups valuing simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a scalable setup cost structure, while Google Cloud Identity provides a more straightforward pricing model. The differences in setup costs highlight diverse strategic approaches to onboarding users efficiently.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a scalable setup cost structure, while Google Cloud Identity provides a more straightforward pricing model. The differences in setup costs highlight diverse strategic approaches to onboarding users efficiently.
ForgeRock excels in deployment efficiency and customer support, appealing to enterprises with complex needs. In comparison, OneLogin by One Identity offers simplicity and user-friendly features, making it attractive for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions with straightforward setups, despite more initial user engagement requirements.
ForgeRock typically involves higher initial setup costs, while OneLogin by One Identity offers a more budget-friendly setup, making them distinctly different in financial entry points for users.
ForgeRock typically involves higher initial setup costs, while OneLogin by One Identity offers a more budget-friendly setup, making them distinctly different in financial entry points for users.
OneLogin excels in affordability, SSO, and user provisioning, appealing to those needing seamless integration and efficient management. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM, with its advanced security protocols and scalability, is ideal for complex environments requiring customizable solutions despite higher costs.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, whereas F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) typically involves higher complexity and setup expenses.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, whereas F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) typically involves higher complexity and setup expenses.
OneLogin offers centralized access management and user-friendly role management enhancing productivity. In comparison, JumpCloud excels in device management and directory integration. OneLogin provides competitive pricing, while JumpCloud is cost-effective for startups with transparent pricing. Each solution has its unique value propositions.
OneLogin excels in security with features such as multi-factor authentication, ideal for secure access control. In comparison, LastPass appeals through its intuitive password management features, making it a streamlined choice for businesses seeking ease of use in password security solutions.
OneLogin offers cost-effective solutions with easy deployment and excellent support, ideal for quick implementation. In comparison, IBM Security Verify Access delivers advanced security features like risk-based authentication, appealing to those prioritizing security and willing to invest in comprehensive capabilities.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a competitive setup cost, while IBM Security Verify Access tends to be higher, highlighting a cost-efficient factor in OneLogin's favor.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a competitive setup cost, while IBM Security Verify Access tends to be higher, highlighting a cost-efficient factor in OneLogin's favor.
Imprivata OneSign excels in secure single sign-on for healthcare, with competitive pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, OneLogin by One Identity offers a versatile and feature-rich platform, providing flexible cloud-based deployment and robust security for diverse industry needs.
Imprivata OneSign's setup cost is a key differentiator, offering a straightforward process, while OneLogin by One Identity presents a more flexible pricing approach, appealing to those seeking customizable cost solutions.
Imprivata OneSign's setup cost is a key differentiator, offering a straightforward process, while OneLogin by One Identity presents a more flexible pricing approach, appealing to those seeking customizable cost solutions.
OneLogin by One Identity is noted for its competitive pricing and efficient support. In comparison, Thales SafeNet Trusted Access offers advanced security features for a comprehensive user experience. Tech buyers may prefer OneLogin for cost-effectiveness, whereas Thales SafeNet appeals with its robust security capabilities.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a faster and cost-effective setup, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access has a more comprehensive but costly setup process.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a faster and cost-effective setup, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access has a more comprehensive but costly setup process.
OneLogin by One Identity offers intuitive navigation and rapid deployment, appealing to businesses prioritizing ease of use and cost-efficiency. In comparison, IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence provides robust analytics and risk-based controls, making it ideal for organizations needing comprehensive security and in-depth governance.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a lower setup cost compared to IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence, highlighting cost efficiency against IBM's more comprehensive initial investment.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a lower setup cost compared to IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence, highlighting cost efficiency against IBM's more comprehensive initial investment.
OneLogin by One Identity excels in flexibility and extensive features for robust security control. In comparison, Tools4ever HelloID focuses on cost-efficiency and ease of use, offering cloud-based access management ideal for swift implementation and budget-conscious organizations.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a moderate setup cost, while Tools4ever HelloID is more affordable. OneLogin provides a broader feature set, contrasting with Tools4ever's streamlined approach.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a moderate setup cost, while Tools4ever HelloID is more affordable. OneLogin provides a broader feature set, contrasting with Tools4ever's streamlined approach.
OneLogin attracts tech buyers with its pricing and seamless integration across applications. In comparison, Intercede MyID is ideal for organizations prioritizing security due to its advanced credential management, offering significant value for sectors with stringent security requirements.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Intercede MyID presents a higher setup investment with additional features.
OneLogin by One Identity offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Intercede MyID presents a higher setup investment with additional features.
i-Sprint AccessMatrix offers advanced security with scalability, appealing for security-focused buyers. In comparison, OneLogin by One Identity prioritizes user-friendly integration and application management. i-Sprint's competitive pricing attracts cost-conscious buyers, whereas OneLogin's ease and integration justify its higher price for enhanced productivity.
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management requires higher initial setup costs, while OneLogin by One Identity offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The key pricing difference lies in the cost-effectiveness of OneLogin's initial implementation.
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management requires higher initial setup costs, while OneLogin by One Identity offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The key pricing difference lies in the cost-effectiveness of OneLogin's initial implementation.
