OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management vs xMatters comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OnSolve and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. OnSolve is ranked #19, while Everbridge is ranked #12. OnSolve holds a 1.8% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Everbridge users are willing to recommend the solution.

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

Read 1 OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management review

1,684 Views
724 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

3,103 Views
2,762 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management and xMatters based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Splunk, SolarWinds and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Alerting and Incident Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

19th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mass Notification Software (2nd), Critical Event Management (CEM) (6th)

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is 1.8%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 4.2%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
xMatters	4.2%
OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management	1.8%
Other	94.0%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

it_user826692

Business Continuity Specialist at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location, but the user interface is too complicated

Emergency alerting for a global company in 14 countries It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location. It has the same general functions as most emergency alerting systems. The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful. The user interface is…

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location."

"The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful."

"Overall, it's a very capable tool and if you keep working at it, it will do what you need it to do."

"The on-call schedule that they have for groups is amazing in terms of how it works and how it triggers. You don't need to do anything. You just upload the users, and you have the calendar of the schedules. It is amazing how it works and how easy it is to work with this feature."

"Simple features create flow sets and build APIs for integrations."

"xMatters is extremely scalable and extensible, giving you a lot of freedom on the applications that you want to integrate, with a large inventory of application templates and no interruptions even when traffic and volume are high, so alerts are handled without delay or compromising the quality or timeliness of delivery."

"Support has been great. They responded very quickly to all the support cases that I have submitted."

"We have reduced the time it takes to resolve major incidents through xMatters’s conference bridge management solution."

"We have not noticed any scalability issues in the two years that we have used the system."

"The automated callouts, without a doubt, are most valuable. They have been a huge gain for our company. Previous to xMatters, there was no real management of the on-call resources or rotas. So, having that centralized and automated has been a huge gain."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"Conference calling requires a complicated syntax formula."

"The user interface is too complicated and aspects that should be offered, such as email subject line editing, are not."

"The user interface could be more intuitive. When you are not familiar with integrations and you're starting fresh, looking for where to begin, it is a bit daunting and not as clear as it could be."

"We would like to see a greater variety of integrations with ServiceNow. It works fine as it is, but an enhancement would be the ability to interact with the major incident module in ServiceNow... The way our major incident process works, when an incident is elevated from a P1 to a major incident, that is an extra flag in ServiceNow. It would be awesome to have xMatters get notification when something goes from a P1 to a major and then have it go through a different workflow, rather than our regular P1."

"In terms of intuitiveness and flexibility of xMatters when it comes to customizing on-call schedules, rotations, and escalations, for me, as an IT professional, setting it up isn't that big of a deal, but I understand that some people struggle with it because when you get wrapped up into it. You can get lost. It's not super complex, but it's complicated enough to the point where you can say that you should have done it another way. The shift part can be confusing for some people. In that respect, one of the shortcomings my team has found is when we have to add another person, such as a new hire, to xMatters, we can't add them to a group within xMatters without having to put them on a shift. If we put them in a group, they have to be on-call. We can create their account, and then they're just out there in limbo until their team says, "You have to be on this shift." One piece of feedback for xMatters is to figure out how to have manageable groups so that they're contactable from xMatters. They do not necessarily have to be on a shift right from the start or at all for that matter."

"One of the main reasons why we don't use xMatters for monitoring and alerting is that it doesn't use the rota to call the person who's on-call. It doesn't look up the rota to find out who's on-call and then contacts that person directly. I am not sure if this has changed now, but the last time we checked, this functionality wasn't there. This is one of the main improvements. We're happy with the rest of it."

"Support may take longer than desired to resolve some issues."

"The REST API is still missing some important functionality, which we require."

"Beyond the typical grouping, xMatters has what is referred to as dynamic teams. Dynamic teams are criteria for setting up and targeting a group of people that meet specific criteria. The bad thing about this setup is that you cannot alter those criteria through the typical xMatters import/export process. The attributes that create the criteria for dynamic teams can only be altered via the Web UI. So, if you want to create a new dynamic team in a mature xMatters environment (one that is already populated with hundreds of users), and you want to add, say, 100 users to that dynamic team, you have to do it manually."

"Unfortunately, we have no way to prevent people from choosing not to receive that level of notification."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I am not really privy to how much my client is paying for this service. They just tell me the number of licenses that they have. Every time that I say, "I need extra licenses to make sure that all Level 1 and 2s have their own xMatters account," they keep telling me that it is too expensive. If the only purpose is to call people, it doesn't justify the cost of paying more than the number of licenses that they already have."

"I would definitely say it's worth the value. I wouldn't say it's expensive, but most people who pick xMatters are not going to select xMatters based on price. There are other lower-priced competitors that are out there. But I would say for what we're getting, it's worth the money."

"The only potential concern is professional services. They are capable, but like to bill on an hourly basis."

"Cost is probably my biggest concern. I know the solution was recently acquired by Everbridge, and Everbridge was one of the competitors that was included in our RFP five years ago. Everbridge's costs were astronomical compared to where every other solution was, not just xMatters."

"The pricing and licensing are okay. I wish that the user licenses were cheaper but the stakeholder licenses are at a reasonable cost."

"There's a significant difference between a full license, which allows people to respond to and acknowledge receipt of messages, and a more scaled-down license, which just allows people to see the notification. So we need to evaluate what license they need when onboarding new users because the full license is significantly more expensive."

"The cost depends very much on the company's size and usage. We're a very high use case compared to many companies, so we had to consider licensing costs carefully. If we added all our users, that would be 30,000, and that's no good; we wouldn't have been able to afford it. For example, we had to put in customization to sync across on-call users. For the license per user, the price is very reasonable and comparable to ServiceNow when factoring in everything that needs to get up and running."

"It is worth the cost. You need to know the number of users that are going to use it, which is usually pretty easy to calculate. It's on a per-user license."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Healthcare Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Comparisons

Everbridge Mass Notification vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 27% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 14% of the time

Rave Alert vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 10% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 9% of the time

RAYVN vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 24% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 16% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 16% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 8% of the time

BigPanda vs xMatters

Compared 3% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

August 2026

OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management report

Download OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

August 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

Send Word Now, OnSolve MIR3, OnSolve CodeRED, OnSolve SmartNotice, OnSolve TelAlert

xMatters IT Management

Overview

The OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management provides data-driven insights and communication solutions to effectively manage and mitigate risks in rapidly changing environments.

OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management helps organizations anticipate, respond to, and recover from critical events. With real-time analytics, automated alerting, and robust security protocols, it empowers decision-makers to act swiftly and efficiently. The platform integrates with existing systems to enhance risk management strategies and ensure continuous operations even during disruptions. Its scalable architecture supports a wide range of industry needs, making it adaptable and reliable.

What are the most important features?

Real-time Alerts: Immediate notifications for informed decision-making.
Threat Intelligence: Advanced analytics to identify potential risks.
Automation: Streamlined processes for quick and efficient response.
Integration: Seamless connectivity with existing tools and systems.
Scalability: Supports varying levels of operational demands.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Response Times: Accelerates the ability to react to critical situations.
Cost Efficiency: Minimizes disruption-related expenses through proactive management.
Enhanced Safety: Protects people and assets with timely interventions.
Operational Continuity: Reduces downtime ensuring uninterrupted operations.

In the healthcare industry, OnSolve Platform supports emergency readiness by ensuring seamless communication during crises. In transportation, it enhances logistics planning by addressing route disruptions. Retailers use it for supply chain continuity, accommodating sudden market changes efficiently. Financial institutions utilize it to safeguard data against potential breaches, ensuring compliance and security. Across different sectors, its implementation varies but consistently delivers robust event management capabilities tailored to industry-specific challenges.

OnSolve

xMatters provides robust automated notifications and incident management, enhancing alerting and critical IT incident handling with seamless integrations, ensuring timely communications.

xMatters is designed for efficient incident management and streamlined IT alerting. It offers flexibility through integrations with ServiceNow, Slack, and others, enhancing communication and workflow management during critical events. Users highlight the SaaS model, customizable on-call scheduling, and effective communication tools. These features reduce incident response times, enhance message delivery, and support team collaboration across platforms.

What features make xMatters stand out?

REST API Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.
Intuitive UI: Simplifies the user experience for managing workflows.
Workflow Builder: Enhances customization for incident processes.
Integration Flexibility: Supports various tools like ServiceNow and Slack.
Customizable Scheduling: Offers tailored on-call schedules and escalation paths.
Automated Notifications: Streamlines incident response times.
Robust Logging: Ensures reliability in tracking system activities.
Device Management: Offers comprehensive control over notification devices.
Self-Service Capabilities: Empowers users in managing their alerts and settings.
Conference Bridging: Facilitates communication during incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by seamless integrations.
Improved Incident Response: Driven by automated notification and escalation pathways.
User Empowerment: Through self-service and device management features.
Accessibility: Enabled by a SaaS-based infrastructure.
Collaboration: Boosted through messaging and conference features.

xMatters supports industries in managing IT incidents and emergency notifications. Teams prioritize alerts, maintain on-call schedules, and automate response workflows, particularly integrating with tools like ServiceNow for critical event handling. Its application in infrastructure monitoring and proactive engagement is notable across sectors.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Gift of Life Michigan, The Salvation Army Greater New York Division, PR Newswire, Carnival Group, The United Network for Organ Sharing, Virgin Atlantic, University of Delaware, NetApp, CME Group

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Splunk, SolarWinds and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.