PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters comparison

PagerDuty and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. PagerDuty is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Everbridge is ranked #13. PagerDuty holds a 8.3% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of PagerDuty users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Everbridge users who would recommend it.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Read 92 PagerDuty Operations Cloud reviews

9,341 Views
4,857 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

2,813 Views
2,504 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2026

PagerDuty Operations Cloud and xMatters compete in incident management. PagerDuty excels with its alerting and integration capabilities, making it standout for rapid response, while xMatters has advantages in workflow automation and customization.

Features: PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers real-time mobile notifications for critical incidents, enabling immediate awareness and response. Its integration capabilities are notable, allowing seamless connection with various tools, and it is recognized for its system reliability. xMatters provides strong automation features with a REST API, supporting custom workflows and detailed logging, enhancing flexibility for users.

Room for Improvement: PagerDuty Operations Cloud could benefit from more integration with monitoring and observability tools, enhancements to its mobile app, and more competitive pricing for small to mid-sized teams. xMatters needs improvement in noise reduction during alert handling, and some users find the interface challenging, which could be refined for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PagerDuty Operations Cloud supports Hybrid, Private, and Public Cloud deployments, and generally receives praise for responsive customer service, although some users face delays. xMatters offers straightforward deployment options, especially in Hybrid and Public Clouds, with reliable customer service, though users occasionally raise pricing concerns.

Pricing and ROI: PagerDuty Operations Cloud is perceived as expensive, notably for smaller teams, but showcases significant ROI through time savings and improved incident response efficiency. xMatters is also noted for high pricing; however, it justifies costs through savings on potential incident expenses and productivity gains.

To learn more, read our detailed PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (5th), AIOps (5th), Critical Event Management (CEM) (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (3rd)

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of PagerDuty Operations Cloud is 8.3%, down from 22.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 4.4%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PagerDuty Operations Cloud	8.3%
xMatters	4.4%
Other	87.3%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2879727

Cloud Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Unified incident response has reduced alert noise and improves on-call focus and coordination

PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its noise reduction by making deduplication and suppression more automated instead of manually tuned, and the service dependency graph could be more intuitive with cleaner visuals and easier-to-understand root cause tracing during major incidents. Automation could go further with smarter runbook triggers and AI-driven suggestions to help find root causes, which could save a lot of time for engineers who are struggling to understand what is actually happening. These AI capabilities could lower the time by maybe 50–60%. Analytics and reporting could be more flexible, allowing custom dashboards and filters and team-level MTTA and MTTR breakdowns, so that it is segregated based on teams and it is much easier to have custom dashboards for the teams to understand more. Alert storms were a recurring frustration for the on-call team, and escalation overrides and service dependency graphs can get a bit confusing in larger environments. More customizable analytics and smarter automation would make the platform even easier, more flexible and more powerful for the team to understand. PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its analytics flexibility with customized dashboards and AI capabilities to be more trained and more reliable. Service dependency mapping can also feel cluttered in big environments, making it harder to trace upstream and downstream impacts during bigger incidents. We implemented PagerDuty Operations Cloud's AI to help with alert grouping and early incident insights, but accuracy was not consistent enough to rely on during critical events. It occasionally grouped unrelated alerts or missed correlations, which limited the operational efficiency gains we expected. The on-call team still depended heavily on manual triage because AI suggestions were not always aligned with the real root cause. Overall, AI added some value but it has not yet reached the reliability needed to significantly improve the incident response efficiency. It needs more training or more work.

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Because of the alert mechanism, our support technicians are prompted about support cases at risk."

"PagerDuty Operations Cloud has positively impacted our organization by accelerating incident response and reducing MTTR by up to 27%, and we are also integrating AI and ML into PagerDuty Operations Cloud."

"Using PagerDuty Operations Cloud is a very crucial part for us; if we do not use it, we don't know what is happening in the customer's environment."

"With one solution, we are able to do the triaging, and that definitely reduced the outage window and the average outage window."

"PagerDuty Operations Cloud's alert reduction feature has significantly impacted my organization, preventing approximately ninety to ninety-five percent of critical incidents from occurring."

"While using PagerDuty hasn't resulted in a decrease in issues, it has allowed us, in combination with the monitoring systems, to know about issues before customers are alerting us."

"The best features that PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers are that it is user-friendly, the design is scalable, and it is quite easy to use for a newbie as well."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud pros

"There are a lot of tools that can do standard notifications, however, the one feature that separates xMatters from others is the ability for it to integrate with any system that has REST API or SOAP API capabilities."

"xMatters is extremely scalable and extensible, giving you a lot of freedom on the applications that you want to integrate, with a large inventory of application templates and no interruptions even when traffic and volume are high, so alerts are handled without delay or compromising the quality or timeliness of delivery."

"One of the things that really attracted me is in workflows, you can write your own custom steps in JavaScript. You are not restricted to the steps that they provide. If you can write it in JavaScript, you can pretty much do anything. It gives me flexibility in ways that other platforms don't. For example, the online dashboard system we use is not a widely used one, but they have an API. So, I'm able to write the JavaScript steps to do things like check if a system's in the maintenance window or create an instant on the dashboard or change the status of an instant. I'm not dependent on the dashboard provider or xMatters creating steps for me."

"Using xMatters to notify our IT and Emergency Management partners is vital for bringing back IT services and notifying our partners about emergencies."

"It has improved our time to respond; prior to the use of xMatters, it might take hours or even a day to get someone involved on a problem, and now it's down to minutes."

"It has been easy to use and very reliable."

"The cloud solution reduces alarming to the core, which means no need to provision your server, which is great."

"We definitely saved money because of time to react and minimized downtime."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"They need to sort out the date / time function when the time zones switch over from Normal to Daylight savings, and vise versa."

"We have seen some inconsistencies with receiving alerts on an iPhone versus an Android device from time to time."

"Currently, New Relic and Datadog handle monitoring and observability better than PagerDuty Operations Cloud."

"I would like to see more content in the notification messages; although, that might be a configuration on our end."

"There is room for improvement with the time schedule. The way the schedule currently works is you assign all the team members in one schedule and it automatically spreads them around throughout the schedule... It would be better to be able to edit the schedule and place my team members where I want, or at least to have that option in addition to the automatic process."

"I would rate PagerDuty Operations Cloud as eight out of ten because the cons include a complex configuration process and high costs for each add-on that I try to obtain, making subscriptions costly, along with limited customization in certain incident workflows."

"Our developers noted that integrating incident bots or chatbots created with AI tools occasionally presents challenges with PagerDuty Operations Cloud."

"The biggest area for improvement with PagerDuty is noise suppression."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud cons

"We cannot go back in time to check out the previous schedules that we had. We can only see them moving forward. I wish we were able to go back and see the previous schedules that we had. That's the biggest thing."

"One of the shortcomings or room for improvement is that their mobile application seems subpar. They could really revamp it and make it function a lot better."

"I've asked for the ability to have tags on groups, and for dynamic lists, meaning the ability to pull data from another location and use it in xMatters dynamically. Right now, for example, if I have a form and want to populate a list, it's a manual process. I have to copy and paste the list items."

"One of the main reasons why we don't use xMatters for monitoring and alerting is that it doesn't use the rota to call the person who's on-call. It doesn't look up the rota to find out who's on-call and then contacts that person directly. I am not sure if this has changed now, but the last time we checked, this functionality wasn't there. This is one of the main improvements. We're happy with the rest of it."

"I would like some minor UI changes."

"The only thing that has caught us out a little bit is that on certain screens, you don't have the same admin options. There should be more consistency with the admin options because not all screens provide you with the same options. As an administrator, it feels like they should always be there. For example, on some screens, there is an Export button that provides fantastic, detail-rich exports, which obviously are very handy because then you can, as an administrator, do your administration, and extract what has been done to share with or prove to others. However, the Export button is not always present, and on the screens where it isn't, you miss it. You're like, "Oh, where's the Export button?", which can be quite problematic. There should be more consistency in the UI in terms of available options for anything that is referenced data or configurable. If you can put it in, there should be a way to run an export function to essentially pull it out. That's the only improvement that I can really think of."

"If you want to alter a custom field, you can do so via import/export. But you can't have an unlimited number of custom fields, so in a large environment with a lot of teams, team provisioning becomes more difficult."

"I would like xMatters to provide users with the capability of administering it on their own. I do a lot of hand-holding with them."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is very high."

"PagerDuty has monthly and yearly licenses available, the costs of which can get quite high if you have a large number of users."

"If we wanted phone calls or additional SMSs, we would have to pitch up for those. They give us so many per month per user, then we have to pay extra if it goes over that."

"The cost is based on the package you select."

"Licensing costs are around $700 a month, and the only additional costs, are phone costs in some instances."

"There is a license needed to use PagerDuty."

"They're very good in pricing compared to the competitors in the area. I would rate them a five out of five in terms of pricing."

"The solution is paid on a monthly basis and represents about 1% of the platform's budget."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud pricing and cost advice

"It seemed comparable or more reasonable than some of the other solutions, at least when we evaluated it. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. Its cost is good, given the breadth of features provided by xMatters."

"Licensing varies widely, depending on usage. It can be cheap or quite expensive, depending on volume and features."

"It feels like good value in the sense that the service is excellent. The people above me who look at such things have renewed it a couple of times, and I think they would have thought whether it was good value, whether it was wildly overpriced, or whether there were better and cheaper alternatives. So, from that perspective, the pricing is fair and proper."

"Then, in pricing, you are limited on your number of SMS messages that you can send a month and the licensing cost annually."

"I'm not really involved with the cost standpoint. I've only heard rumors of how much it costs, and if it costs what I think it costs, its cost is very high as compared to a lot of other tools that we're using here. It seems on the higher end from a cost standpoint."

"The pricing is tiered so we took that into account. If we were to license 10 or 20 people, that would be a certain price. And if we were to license 50 or 100, there would be a little bit of discounting. But the per-user license was right in line with what we were expecting."

"The pricing is too high... we procured 150 licenses and we have almost 1,500 users in IT. We had to come up with a few ideas for determining which users get a license and which users don't need one. Due to the limitation of the number of licenses, we were unable to integrate the user profiles with Active Directory."

"The cost depends very much on the company's size and usage. We're a very high use case compared to many companies, so we had to consider licensing costs carefully. If we added all our users, that would be 30,000, and that's no good; we wouldn't have been able to afford it. For example, we had to put in customization to sync across on-call users. For the license per user, the price is very reasonable and comparable to ServiceNow when factoring in everything that needs to get up and running."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Performing Arts

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	74

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PagerDuty?

I am not sure about the influence of PagerDuty Operations Cloud on revenue protection in terms of reducing alert fatigue and incident costs, as these are organizational-level decisions, and employe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PagerDuty?

I think PagerDuty Operations Cloud could be improved by having two fields for incident updates. In my work, I handle incidents that have two fields: work notes visible only to developers working on...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PagerDuty?

My usual use cases with PagerDuty Operations Cloud involve handling incidents through a full flow. When there is an outage, an incident is created that can be either severity one or severity two. A...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Opsgenie vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

BigPanda vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk On-Call vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Moogsoft vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud Competitors

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 19% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 17% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 10% of the time

ServiceNow vs xMatters

Compared 5% of the time

Rootly vs xMatters

Compared 5% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

July 2026

Download PagerDuty Operations Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

July 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

No data available

xMatters IT Management

Overview

PagerDuty Operations Cloud focuses on efficient incident management, featuring advanced alert and notification systems, mobile alerts, and AI-driven functionalities that facilitate streamlined on-call schedules and integrations with major monitoring tools.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers comprehensive incident management with real-time alerts and notifications via mobile, SMS, and calls. This empowers teams to respond swiftly and reduce missed incidents. Efficient on-call management through automated scheduling and escalation enhances team productivity, while AI-driven alert grouping minimizes noise. Integration with tools like AWS and Datadog further streamlines operations.

What are the key features of PagerDuty Operations Cloud?

Real-time Incident Alerts: Improves response times by ensuring immediate notifications.
AI-driven Alert Grouping: Minimizes noise for enhanced focus and efficiency.
Automated Scheduling: Streamlines on-call management and escalation.
Monitoring Tool Integration: Seamlessly works with tools like AWS and Datadog.
Mobile Alerts: Enables SMS and call notifications for instant communication.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces operational burden through automation.
Improved Team Productivity: Lowers incident noise and accelerates resolution.
Enhanced Customization: Tailors alert prioritization and escalation policies.
Time Savings: Expedites incident management and reduces error rates.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud implementation spans industries like e-commerce and IT services, where it automates anomaly detection and manages high-severity incidents. Its integration capabilities and AIOps features significantly enhance incident management, proving valuable for sectors demanding real-time performance and responsiveness.

PagerDuty

xMatters provides robust automated notifications and incident management, enhancing alerting and critical IT incident handling with seamless integrations, ensuring timely communications.

xMatters is designed for efficient incident management and streamlined IT alerting. It offers flexibility through integrations with ServiceNow, Slack, and others, enhancing communication and workflow management during critical events. Users highlight the SaaS model, customizable on-call scheduling, and effective communication tools. These features reduce incident response times, enhance message delivery, and support team collaboration across platforms.

What features make xMatters stand out?

REST API Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.
Intuitive UI: Simplifies the user experience for managing workflows.
Workflow Builder: Enhances customization for incident processes.
Integration Flexibility: Supports various tools like ServiceNow and Slack.
Customizable Scheduling: Offers tailored on-call schedules and escalation paths.
Automated Notifications: Streamlines incident response times.
Robust Logging: Ensures reliability in tracking system activities.
Device Management: Offers comprehensive control over notification devices.
Self-Service Capabilities: Empowers users in managing their alerts and settings.
Conference Bridging: Facilitates communication during incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by seamless integrations.
Improved Incident Response: Driven by automated notification and escalation pathways.
User Empowerment: Through self-service and device management features.
Accessibility: Enabled by a SaaS-based infrastructure.
Collaboration: Boosted through messaging and conference features.

xMatters supports industries in managing IT incidents and emergency notifications. Teams prioritize alerts, maintain on-call schedules, and automate response workflows, particularly integrating with tools like ServiceNow for critical event handling. Its application in infrastructure monitoring and proactive engagement is notable across sectors.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

40% of the Fortune 100 TrustPagerDuty. Customers include: Slack, Intuit, Zendesk, Panasonic, Pinterest, Airbnb, eHarmony, McKesson, Comcast

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters

June 2026

Free Report: PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters report.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.