OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #35, while Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 1.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

1,625 Views
1,398 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

6,409 Views
3,845 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Business Processing Testing compete in testing environments. Visual Studio Test Professional is stronger in terms of pricing and support, though OpenText Business Processing Testing is favored for its comprehensive features, suggesting superior value for its price.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates seamlessly into the Microsoft ecosystem, supporting collaboration and efficient coding processes with features like a rich IDE, advanced debugging capabilities, and easy code deployment. OpenText Business Processing Testing excels with end-to-end testing capabilities, extensive automation, and process validation, adding significant value to complex business environments, focusing on business processes and cross-technology scalability.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could enhance its tools for business process modeling, improve its learning curve for new users, and expand its integration capabilities beyond Microsoft products. OpenText Business Processing Testing could benefit from streamlined deployment processes, a more user-friendly interface, and reduced complexity in setting up tests to make it accessible for nontechnical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional benefits from integration with Microsoft tools, ensuring straightforward deployment and community-driven technical support. OpenText Business Processing Testing, while providing extensive deployment frameworks, presents a steeper learning curve, requiring more detailed setup but offering substantial documentation and support for intricate business operations.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional offers a competitive setup cost with potential for high ROI due to integration with Microsoft services, aiding cost-effective development processes. OpenText Business Processing Testing, although higher in initial costs, provides justified returns through its focus on specialized sectors and detailed process validation, delivering substantial ROI for businesses requiring comprehensive test environments.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

35th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 2.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	2.5%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	1.0%
Other	96.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."

"The integrated unit testing and extensive search features have made things easier."

"The integration of Visual Studio with Azure DevOps has improved team collaboration significantly."

"Searching is extensive and helpful."

"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."

"The interface is easy to use."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is great for the development of .NET and we use it both as a cloud solution and on-premises."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the speed of the application, it is a well-documented, complete product, and reasonably priced."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."

"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."

"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."

"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."

"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."

"The stability of this solution needs to be improved because sometimes it hangs and crashes."

"The interface should be made attractive."

"The performance could be faster."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"It is a price-effective solution"

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."

"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."

"I think that the pricing is quite good."

"The product is very expensive."

"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Construction Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?

We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 14% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

Testim vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 3% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

October 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

October 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

Visual Studio Test Professional offers sophisticated testing capabilities with a focus on integration with Azure DevOps. Supporting software development, it aids in application creation, lifecycle management, and testing, accommodating a wide array of programming languages.

Visual Studio Test Professional delivers robust features essential for software developers, including seamless integration with C# and .NET projects and extensive customization options. The platform's robust debugging, unit testing, and memory analysis help streamline the development process. Its intuitive interface and integration with tools like IntelliSense and NuGet package manager enhance productivity, alongside its collaboration capabilities with Azure DevOps. While beneficial, it faces challenges such as integration issues with CI tools, high technical skill requirements, and concerns about pricing and stability. Refinements in user interface design, platform compatibility, and support for AI and machine learning technologies remain necessary.

What are the most important features of Visual Studio Test Professional?

Seamless Integration: Works efficiently with C# and .NET, reducing setup complexities.
Intelligent Tools: Includes IntelliSense for coding, simplifying complex tasks.
Robust Debugging: Offers advanced debugging features for troubleshooting.
Extensive Customization: Adaptable to meet development needs effectively.
Azure DevOps Collaboration: Enhances project collaboration and tracking.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines development workflow, saving time.
Enhanced Collaboration: Team integrations facilitate smoother project execution.
Expanded Capabilities: Supports automation, leading to increased productivity.
Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive resources aid in navigating platform complexities.

Visual Studio Test Professional finds its application in software development and automation testing industries, where technical teams use it to create and manage applications across multiple environments. It supports test-driven development, ensuring secure and functional project outputs, and aids in the integration of DevOps practices, enhancing collaborative efforts in software solutions creation.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

October 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.