No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo

OpenText Business Processing Testing Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is OpenText Business Processing Testing?

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

Get the OpenText Business Processing Testing Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing, Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Functional Testing and more!
OpenText Business Processing Testing is the #36 ranked solution in top Functional Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Business Processing Testing an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. OpenText Business Processing Testing is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis Tosca.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Business Processing Testing
April 2026
Get the report
Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText Business Processing Testing mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Business Processing Testing0.9%
Tricentis Tosca10.1%
OpenText Functional Testing6.8%
Other82.2%
Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsMay 9, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis ToscaMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Business Processing Testing vs Worksoft CertifyMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Business Processing Testing vs OpenText Functional TestingMay 9, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.110.1%96%113 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Functional Testing4.06.8%87%98 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers modularity in test design, separating test development from automation. Users value its reusability, ease of integration, and simplicity in designing tests. Both technical and non-technical teams, including business analysts, effectively collaborate using pre-designed components. The scalability, maintainability, and cross-technology support, alongside boosting productivity, are highly appreciated aspects.
  • "This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."
  • "The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."
  • "We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Business Processing Testing requires speed improvements for test execution since it remains a concern. Quality Center integration contributes to prolonged script access and modification time. Implementing offline editing options and local script copies would be beneficial. Users desire less reliance on the ALM tool and more repository flexibility. Improved stability was noted in version 12.01. Moreover, integrating in-tool guidance akin to Selenium's could aid newcomers. Slow script run speed is observed often due to the client/server approach.
  • "There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."
  • "The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."
  • "Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

Service and Support

Customer service for OpenText Business Processing Testing is generally rated highly, but technical support has several areas needing improvement. Users report inefficiency, with issues often unresolved as support tends to circulate between tickets. Many rely on external consultancy services for quicker responses. R&D offers assistance for unresolved problems. Some note limited technical expertise in certain regions, while satisfaction levels vary, ranging from below Tricentis Tosca standards to satisfactory, with some not engaging technical support at all.

Deployment

Users found OpenText Business Processing Testing's initial setup simple and straightforward. Test automation specialists recommended assistance from experienced users to optimize architecture. Flexibility and scalability were highlighted, yet inexperienced users might face challenges. Employing skilled professionals with prior knowledge, like Marco, proved beneficial. Understanding the framework's intricacies, including data and shared assets, is crucial for effective implementation. For those familiar with its capabilities, OpenText Business Processing Testing is not complex, ensuring easier configuration.

Scalability

OpenText Business Processing Testing exhibits effective scalability. Users report no issues with scalability. For optimal scaling, a dedicated framework team is beneficial while the remaining team members employ it. Scalability is largely determined by the framework and the team responsible for its setup. Several groups successfully employ the testing aspect for numerous users. Although some users don't have immediate plans to scale further, they are currently satisfied with its scalability performance.

Stability

Users find OpenText Business Processing Testing stable, reporting no significant issues. It's praised for versatility, robustness, and seamless integration with Jenkins, enabling autonomous testing and reporting. Tasks are generally achievable with scalability and cross-platform usability not posing challenges. Stability is noted with SAP, but users experience difficulties with web-based flex objects due to lack of clear solutions. Despite minor web constraints, the stability remains largely positive.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OpenText Business Processing Testing Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Compare OpenText Business Processing Testing with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText Business Processing Testing

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?
  • Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
  • Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
  • Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
  • Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
  • Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
  • Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
  • Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
  • Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText Business Processing Testing was previously known as Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing.

OpenText Business Processing Testing customers

Migros Bank AG

Related questions

  • 40
Cross-Platform Automated Testing Tool
  • 82
Anyone have a good example of a Test Automation Business Case?
  • 51
When evaluating Functional Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 47
What is the best automation tool to test dynamic data?
  • 63
SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?
  • 61
Tosca Testsuite Version 10.0
  • 61
What is the best tool for SAP testing?
  • 89
Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?
  • 91
What are some common causes for software failure?
  • 80
Is Panaya Test Dynamix better than Tricentis Tosca?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Functional Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
Testim vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
Testim vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
Zeenyx AscentialTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo
Zeenyx AscentialTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing
See all alternatives
 
OpenText Business Processing Testing Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies4.0I find Micro Focus Business Process Testing very helpful for automating use cases. My main suggestion is adding in-tool explanations for new users, similar to Selenium, to ease learning. I rate it 8/10 and recommend it.
Testing Automation Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I appreciate this solution's usability for non-technical testers and SAP stability. My main concerns are its tight ALM integration and web flex object difficulties. Despite this, the setup was straightforward, and I'm generally satisfied, rating it 7-8 out of 10.
Test Automation Architect at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5I find BPT valuable as it enables business analysts to create quality test cases, improving maintainability and reducing technical dependency, though its run speed is slower and HP support could be better. Overall, it's best-in-class for DevOps.
Regional Infrastructure Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.0I found this solution robust, enabling comprehensive, cross-platform test automation from web services to GUI, delivering significant ROI. Initial instability resolved quickly. Deployment and scalability were excellent, though local technical support was limited.
Test Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees3.0I value this solution's simplicity, integration, and ability to boost productivity through tester automation. However, test access in Quality Center is slow, components can't copy, and customer service is poor. I'd recommend it for long-term vision despite the price.
Test Automation Engineer with 51-200 employeesWe value its content reusability, ease of building tests, and reduced maintenance for a faster ROI. It's stable, deployed easily, and scalable, though test execution speed needs improvement.
Automation QA Specialist at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I value BPT for its modularity and fast test development, which separates automation from test design and enables manual testers to contribute. Setup was simple, unlike QTP. My main concern is execution speed.