OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

OpenText and Parasoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #36, while Parasoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in FT, compared to Parasoft’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

493 Views
419 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,949 Views
1,062 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and OpenText Business Processing Testing compete in software testing solutions. Parasoft SOAtest has an advantage in support and user satisfaction, while OpenText stands out for its advanced features despite potentially higher costs.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers robust API testing with advanced service virtualization, extensive automation, and CI/CD integration. OpenText Business Processing Testing provides powerful load testing tools, excels in handling complex business processes, and offers strong analytical features tailored for enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its feature set for complex business processes, improve its analytical capabilities, and offer more low-code testing options. OpenText Business Processing Testing needs simplification in deployment, better user interface design, and more streamlined CI/CD integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is praised for its efficient deployment, quick setup, and excellent support services. OpenText Business Processing Testing has a more complex deployment due to its feature-rich environment but provides comprehensive resources and detailed onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest features a straightforward pricing structure focused on simplicity for a quick ROI. OpenText Business Processing Testing incurs higher initial setup costs, but its rich features justify the investment for large-scale operations seeking extensive testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

36th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), API Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 2.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	2.0%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.8%
Other	97.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The solution is scalable."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 14% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 12% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

March 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

March 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

SOAtest

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest

March 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.