OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #36, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 9.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

940 Views
808 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

21,385 Views
12,831 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Tricentis Tosca and OpenText Business Processing Testing compete in the software testing automation category. Tricentis Tosca appears to have an edge due to its broader test automation capabilities compared to OpenText's notable integration with other business solutions.

Features: Tricentis Tosca emphasizes model-based testing, allows continuous testing for comprehensive end-to-end automation, and integrates well with various DevOps tools. OpenText Business Processing Testing specializes in SAP environment support, offers efficient performance testing, and integrates seamlessly with OpenText's suite of business solutions.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could enhance its user interface to be more intuitive and improve documentation to aid less technical users. Additional system resources may yield more efficient performance. For OpenText Business Processing Testing, expanding beyond SAP environments and enhancing its testing scope could be beneficial. It could also benefit from improved mobile testing capabilities and broader tool integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers both cloud-based and on-premises deployment, supported by responsive technical support to ensure quick deployment. OpenText Business Processing Testing also supports flexible deployment but highlights integration into existing enterprise structures. Both products provide strong customer service, with Tricentis Tosca acknowledged for comprehensive support across diverse environments.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is associated with a higher initial cost, offering extensive automation that promises significant long-term ROI. Alternatively, OpenText Business Processing Testing provides a more competitive pricing strategy suitable for organizations with substantial SAP investments, facilitating quicker ROI initially. The distinction lies in Tosca's higher upfront investment for extensive long-term benefits, whereas OpenText presents a cost-effective option tailored to specific enterprise requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

36th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 9.9%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	9.9%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.9%
Other	89.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"The most important feature is its ability to support the technical automation of specific clients that we cannot use with other tools."

"Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira."

"The primary driver for us is that it puts automation into the hands of non-technical testers."

"Testcase design is most valuable, as it has helped in two different aspects, storing the test data in one place, and deciding how many test cases are needed for a given scenario using one of the inbuilt algorithms, thereby ensuring the test coverage."

"Tests written once can be reused across different projects."

"It is easy to automate tasks, highly flexible, straightforward to learn, and easy to maintain."

"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."

"This tool has test data management capability along with test management."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."

"The main area where there is room for improvement is how they do upgrades."

"Exploratory testing engine needs improved element recognition (at lease in JAVA Swing)"

"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."

"Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It should improve the testing of legacy systems and interfaces."

"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."

"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."

"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."

"There are two licenses: single user and multiple user. A multiple-user license means that several people can work together on one project and collaborate on code stored in a central location. A single-user license is for people working alone on a one particular application. It's much cheaper than a multi-user workspace. If you are getting a large volume of licenses for an enterprise, you can probably negotiate a discount, but I'm not sure about that."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

"It is expensive."

"There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies."

"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."

"It is expensive. There is also the training cost, but it does speed up the process. So, you get a return on investment."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	74

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 20% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Testim vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

June 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

May 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.