OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #36, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

437 Views
363 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,615 Views
10,424 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and OpenText Business Process Testing are leading contenders in software testing, each offering unique strengths. Tricentis Tosca is renowned for its support and ease of deployment, whereas OpenText is favored for its feature-rich capabilities, especially in SAP testing.

Features: Tricentis Tosca provides model-based test automation, robust CI/CD pipeline integration, and seamless support for multiple software ecosystems. It allows for codeless automation, enabling easier usage for non-technical users. OpenText excels in SAP application testing, comprehensive test management capabilities, and has a strong focus on enterprise applications, supporting complex business processes.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could enhance its user interface and improve its capabilities in integrating with niche enterprise applications. Expanding advanced analytics and reporting features would be beneficial. Additionally, support for more bespoke environments could increase adaptability. OpenText could benefit from streamlined initial setup processes to reduce IT complexity. An enhanced user interface and better support for small to mid-sized enterprises will make it even more versatile. More intuitive documentation and user guidance would also enhance the deployment experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca is known for its straightforward deployment process, with dedicated customer service enhancing user onboarding and troubleshooting. This makes it appealing for rapid implementation. OpenText, while potentially requiring a more in-depth IT commitment, offers extensive enterprise support that is particularly beneficial for large-scale SAP implementations. Its strong customer service helps navigate deployment challenges for significant returns.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is competitively priced, offering a rapid return on investment due to quick deployment and time-saving automation features. Its cost-effectiveness attracts businesses seeking rapid implementation with minimal initial outlay. OpenText, while potentially incurring higher initial costs, delivers significant ROI over time, especially for enterprises focusing on comprehensive SAP business process testing. Its deep integration potential promises long-term benefits, making the investment worthwhile.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

36th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 12.9%, down from 20.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis Tosca	12.9%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.8%
Other	86.3%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"It's been very helpful to have connectivity with mobile. The tool also identifies some of the actual changes from the recordings on the actual testing suite. That is something that I really like."

"Makes optimal use of Model-based Test practice in getting Object-references from the application."

"It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting."

"It's a simple tool, particularly in terms of system testing. You can also convert and automate using Tricentis Tosca with ease."

"It offers many features, such as risk-based testing and scenario creation using Kafka."

"As a codeless automation tool, the product offers a user-friendly experience without requiring extensive coding knowledge. Users can easily handle various applications, including web applications, SAP applications, Windows applications, and even Salesforce applications, without manual coding."

"Tosca can go through platforms to make end-to-end testing across CRM, billing, provisioning, order management flow, and databases to check for errors."

"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."

"Their license management should be improved. One of our customers is a global customer. They want to use one licensed server and then split the licenses based on the different users of the different business units, but currently, there is only one license server that everybody can access. There is no control, and that's why sometimes congestion can happen."

"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."

"The product needs to improve object identification. The identify with properties and anchor methods work perfectly, while the by-index and image methods may face challenges."

"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."

"Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution."

"You need to spend much more time learning the tool and how to use it, compared to others."

"In terms of areas for improvement, Tricentis has a variety of tools, even its test management tool called qTest. Tricentis Tosca does have integration with different Tricentis tools, but the integration is geared towards a larger organization perspective. For very small organizations that have minimal licenses, the integration needs to be improvised. For example, I belong to a smaller organization that has only one license, so the capability that the tool provides for integration isn't sufficient because my company needs to have separate workspaces. When Tricentis Tosca is going to be running, it is going to use that license, but my company wants another separate workspace to record, relay, and test. This is what my team has been struggling with, and the mechanism is probably there, but that needs more time and investigation, so I can't say that I'm one hundred percent certain that Tricentis Tosca, in terms of integration for a smaller organization is insufficient. Another area for improvement is that Tricentis Tosca is currently just a Windows-based tool which affects the market because nowadays, Windows isn't the only operating system, for example, there's also Apple or IOS that's moving much faster than Windows."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."

"I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to talk about the pricing, but it has some significant costs. For example, you have to pay a license and maintenance fee. Then the rest of the terms are negotiable. We have to consider what we need and what benefit we get from it."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

"The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten."

"Pricing could be better."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive tool and the licensing is not simple."

"We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 35% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 28% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

January 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.