OpenText Core Application Security vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

OpenText and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OpenText is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3, while Rapid7 is ranked #30. OpenText holds a 3.0% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Application S...

Read 62 OpenText Core Application Security reviews

6,593 Views
4,945 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

1,512 Views
922 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Application S...

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Core Application Security and Rapid7 AppSpider compete in the application security solutions category. Rapid7 AppSpider seems to have the upper hand due to its efficient reporting and versatile capabilities.

Features: OpenText Core Application Security provides a comprehensive platform with static and dynamic code scanning, HIPAA compliance, and extensive application management, known for user-friendliness and efficient security integration. Rapid7 AppSpider handles compliance needs effectively with detailed vulnerability reporting, robust data management, versatile user authentication, and efficient scanning processes.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Application Security could improve its reporting capabilities, reduce false positives, enhance reporting visuals, and offer better incident management integration. Rapid7 AppSpider should focus on improving stability, reducing false positives, addressing challenges with integration, and enhancing mobile application scanning and executive reporting features for non-technical stakeholders.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both OpenText Core Application Security and Rapid7 AppSpider offer flexible deployment options across on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud environments. OpenText receives mixed reviews for customer support, with some users experiencing long wait times. In contrast, Rapid7 generally receives praise for providing timely and knowledgeable support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Application Security is priced high, with users valuing its features but seeking more flexible subscription models. Rapid7 AppSpider is moderately priced, with users able to negotiate pricing structures, perceiving the costs as fair and appreciating the return on investment through its detailed insights and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Application Security vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Application S...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (14th)

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 3.0%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Core Application Security	3.0%
Rapid7 AppSpider	0.7%
Other	96.3%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Supports secure development pipelines and improves issue detection but limits internal visibility and needs broader dashboard integration

If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. That was the only reason we migrated from Fortify on Demand to another solution. Fortify has another tool which is Fortify WebInspect. On Demand is the outsourcing solution, and WebInspect you can use with your in-house team, which is basically the product developed by the Fortify team. For automated scanning, Fortify helps a lot. Regarding the visibility for the internal team, everyone is moving toward the DevSecOps side, and Fortify team has made good progress that you can integrate into your CICD pipeline. One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together. If you have one tool that works for different solutions, it helps a lot. They are doing good, but they should invest more on the AI side as well because AI security is evolving these days. On the cloud side, they have already made good progress, but I believe they should explore the new area related to AI security as well.

Read full review

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

Clients benefit from broad authentication and effective crawling but need localization improvements

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We identified a lot of security vulnerability much earlier in the development and could fix this well before the product was rolled out to a huge number of clients."

"Fortify on Demand is easy to use and the reporting is good."

"The most important feature of the product is to follow today's technology fast, updated rules and algorithms (of the product)."

"Fortify supports most languages. Other tools are limited to Java and other typical languages. IBM's solutions aren't flexible enough to support any language. Fortify also integrates with lots of tools because it has API support."

"I use the solution in my company for security code scans."

"It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades."

"This product is top-notch solution and the technology is the best on the market."

"The static code analyzers are the most valuable features of this solution."

More OpenText Core Application Security pros

"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."

"The entire solution is interactive and has a point-and-click user experience, which makes it easy to find items or drill down on information. You don't need specialized skills to use the product."

"It scans all the components developed within a web application."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."

"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."

"The initial deployment is very straightforward and simple. The product is stable if configured properly."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"The Visual Studio plugin seems to hang when a scan is run on big projects. I would expect some improvements there."

"It's still a little bit too complex for regular developers. It takes a little bit more time than usual. I know static code scan is not the main focus of the tool, but the overall time span to scan the code, and even to set up the code scanning, is a bit overwhelming for regular developers."

"We typically do our bulk uploads of our scans with some automation at the end of the development cycle but the scanning can take a lot of time. If you were doing all of it at regular intervals it would still consume a lot of time. This could procedure could improve."

"There's a bit of a learning curve. Our development team is struggling with following the rules and following the new processes."

"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand can improve by having more graphs. For example, to show the improvement of the level of security."

"They could provide features for artificial intelligence similar to other vendors."

"I would rate the support for OpenText at no more than three out of ten; it is really bad, and we encounter a lot of problems when getting support."

"The thing that could be improved is reducing the cost of usage and including some of the most pricey features, such as dynamic analysis and that sort of functionality, which makes the difference between different types of tools."

More OpenText Core Application Security cons

"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."

"AppSpider has some problems with the RAM needed while scanning."

"The product needs to be able to scale for large companies, like ours. We have millions of IP addresses that need to be scanned, and the scalability is not great."

"Integration could be better."

"This price of this solution is a little bit expensive."

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

"The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model it's based on how many applications you wish to scan."

"The solution is expensive and the price could be reduced."

"It is quite expensive. Pricing and the licensing model could be improved."

"We used the one-time application, Security Scan Dynamic. I believe the original fee was $8,000."

"We are still using the trial version at this point but I can already see from the trial version alone that it is a good product. For others, I would say that Fortify on Demand might look expensive at the beginning, but it is very powerful and so you shouldn't be put off by the price."

"Fortify on Demand is moderately priced, but its pricing could be more flexible."

"I believe the rental license is not too expensive, but it provides a lot of information about the vulnerabilities."

"Their subscriptions could use a little bit of a reworking, but I am very happy with what they're able to provide."

More OpenText Core Application Security pricing and cost advice

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"The price is pretty fair."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	44

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 18% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 11% of the time

Coverity Static vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 15% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 9% of the time

GitLab vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 3% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security

January 2026

OpenText Core Application Security report

Download OpenText Core Application Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

January 2026

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

AppSpider

Overview

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?

Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

February 2026

Free Report: OpenText Core Application Security vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Application Security vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Application Security vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.