Rapid7 AppSpider vs Veracode comparison

Read 208 Veracode reviews

32,067 Views
16,354 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Veracode and Rapid7 AppSpider are leading competitors in the application security testing category. Rapid7 AppSpider has the upper hand due to extensive features and vulnerabilities coverage, making it a preferred choice for advanced users despite its higher costs.

Features: Veracode is known for its extensive reporting capabilities, seamless integration with development tools, and user-friendly setup. Rapid7 AppSpider is favored for its broad vulnerability coverage, ease of automation, and superior scanning depth.

Room for Improvement: Veracode users suggest enhancements in the dashboard, streamlined onboarding process, and operational efficiency. Rapid7 AppSpider users call for improved speed, reduced false positives, and accuracy of results.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode offers straightforward deployment and attentive customer service, which benefits new users. Rapid7 AppSpider provides a robust, customizable deployment model, offering flexibility for customers seeking advanced solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode offers lower initial setup costs, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers, with promises of a quick ROI. Rapid7 AppSpider, while more expensive upfront, provides long-term value through extensive features and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Rapid7 AppSpider vs. Veracode Report (Updated: November 2026).

Rapid7 AppSpider vs. Veracode

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Container Security (14th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 4.9%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Veracode	4.9%
Rapid7 AppSpider	0.8%
Other	94.3%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

Clients benefit from broad authentication and effective crawling but need localization improvements

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization.…

Read full review

Yash Shende

Software Development Engineer II at Rocket Software

Monthly scans have provided baseline security but still miss critical vulnerabilities

Veracode can improve to stand in this market. They do not have to do much; they just need to improve their UI experience and add more documentation within the application rather than just creating documentation pages on different websites. They need to ensure their web application guides whoever uses it. Since whoever uses Veracode must be a technical person, they just need to guide them to the actual points. They can also improve their security capabilities by adding more filters to identify what vulnerabilities their application has. They need to improve their scanning engine to scan for more critical defects. Also, the integration part can be enhanced by adding features to integrate with a CLI, such as introducing a CLI version or a Jenkins plugin. If such features exist, they should show it as a pop-up, signaling that they have a new feature. Currently, it feels Veracode from two years ago is still the same, so that is something Veracode needs to improve. They can improve the security part. Some of the severe security issues were never caught by Veracode in the reports. In fact, I have never seen any high or critical severity issues pop up in my Veracode report. That is one thing they can improve on their scanning ability to catch high severity issues. Next is integration; Veracode does not provide any tools to integrate with Jenkins or CLI. I do not even know if there is any CLI for Veracode that I can use to automate in my pipeline. The last thing is the UI interface that they have, as it is a bit confusing. I remember we did not have the capability to handle authentications of our internal application. We had to write Selenium code using a Selenium IDE. To write a Selenium script for a Veracode scan, you have to download a Selenium IDE, record it, and then paste that file into Veracode. I can see that Selenium IDE is already decommissioned, so it is no longer used by anyone. Still, we have to use it because Veracode only supports that kind of file for Selenium to automate. They can add more ways to authenticate our application using normal JavaScript or Python or Shell script. I feel these are the four main points. They can document it more by adding tooltips into the application that explain why a parameter is required and what other options are available. For the same example with the Selenium script, they can add a link to their documentation that explains what other kinds of scripts can be written for authentication. I feel they can also make the UI more intuitive so that whoever uses it can guide themselves, as whoever uses Veracode is already a technical person.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."

"This solution is a leader in the industry."

"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."

"Customer service has been quite good."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."

"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

"Source code composition analysis for vulnerabilities and license compliance is the most valuable feature."

"I like the static scanning, and Veracode's interface is excellent. The dashboard is easy to navigate."

"Their dashboard is really good, overall. In my opinion, it's one of the best in the market, and I say that because we have used other service providers."

"It's not "one policy fits all." I really like that Veracode allows me to set up specific policies that I can apply to applications."

"Veracode has helped immensely with developer security training and in building developer security skills."

"I like Veracode's integration with our CI/CD. It automatically scans our code when we do the build. It can also detect any security flaws in our third-party libraries. Veracode is good at pinpointing the sections of code that have vulnerabilities."

"The best features in Veracode include static analysis and the early detection of vulnerable libraries; it integrates with tools such as Jenkins."

"It has improved the way our organization functions mostly because we can perfect the security issues on our products, allowing our product managers to plan fixes based on severity for specific releases and improving our external image by showing that we take security seriously and address issues in a timely way."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"It needs better integration with mobile applications."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"The enterprise interface is too simple. It should be more customizable."

"One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions."

"This price of this solution is a little bit expensive."

"AppSpider could improve in the area of integration. They need to add more integration opportunities."

"For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"Integration could be better. For example, while doing the scanning, using the recording username and passwords, there are issues."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

"The JIRA integration automation aspect of it could be improved significantly. We want to have a way to create tickets that are going to allow people to work through those flaws that we're finding. We don't want people to feel like they're missing out on something or that they're not following directions in the right way."

"The overall reporting structure is complicated, and it's difficult to understand the report."

"However, they were quick to comment that the product is too expensive and that there are too many false positives which take too much time to remediate."

"Calypso (our application) is large and the results take up to two months. Further, we also have to package Calypso in a special manner to meet size guidelines."

"The scanning takes a lot of time to complete."

"Sometimes the scans are not done quickly, but the solutions that it provides are really good. The quality is high, but the analysis is not done extremely quickly."

"Straightforward to set up, but the configuration of the rules engine is difficult and complicated."

"Veracode isn't important to the organization's shift-left security strategy itself. It's a tool."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"The price is pretty fair."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"Veracode's price is reasonable."

"I found Veracode very expensive, though I'm not the person paying for it. I was surprised to find out how much the subscription costs and that the executive board approved it, but it was a no-brainer because now my company has better security scans."

"The price of Veracode Static Analysis could improve."

"Veracode's pricing is competitive."

"Veracode provides value for the cost, with no additional charges apart from the standard licensing fee."

"We are still considering it at the enterprise level. It has a subscription-based model. We find its price a little high based on the features it provides."

"They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey."

"It has good, fair licensing. If the price could depend on the scope of its scanning or the languages supported, then that would be better."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	70
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	114

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 5% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 3% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

GitLab vs Veracode

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Veracode

Compared 2% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Rapid7 AppSpider

October 2026

Download Veracode product report

October 2026

Also Known As

AppSpider

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Rapid7 AppSpider provides rapid vulnerability detection and comprehensive reporting, integrating seamlessly with development cycles to enhance web application security. It is widely recognized for its detailed remediation steps and compliance with international standards like ISO27001.

Renowned for its robust security assessment capabilities, Rapid7 AppSpider stands out by offering advanced crawling technology and interactive interface features. Despite its slower performance compared to some competitors, it efficiently manages applications with configurable reporting and a focus on reducing false positives. Users find its automation and extensive integration capabilities valuable, although they indicate a need for improved interface enhancements and better report localization for specific regions like Japan.

What are the key features of Rapid7 AppSpider?

Rapid Vulnerability Detection: Quickly identifies security issues within applications.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed, configurable reports for thorough analysis.
International Compliance: Aligns with standards such as ISO27001 for security assurance.
Extensive Integration: Integrates with various software development life cycles.
Interactive Interface: User-friendly design enhances ease of use and engagement.
Automation: Streamlines processes with automated scanning capabilities.
Portability: Easily managed across different environments and platforms.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Rapid7 AppSpider?

Detailed Remediation Steps: Provides guidance on addressing identified vulnerabilities.
Low False Positives: Ensures higher accuracy in scan results.
Compliance Control: Helps maintain adherence to security standards and regulations.
API Auditing Capabilities: Extensive checks on web application interfaces.
Comprehensive Reports: Detailed documentation aids in security decision-making.

In sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology, companies leverage Rapid7 AppSpider to enhance their security management. It plays an integral role in vulnerability assessment processes, aiding in the compliance with international security standards and reforms in security testing strategies, especially during auditing and routine application scans.

Rapid7

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

Microsoft

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.