OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs ReadyAPI Performance comparison

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. ReadyAPI Performance

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

4th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReadyAPI Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 7.8%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Performance is 2.4%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	7.8%
ReadyAPI Performance	2.4%
Other	89.8%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Centralized cloud testing has improved global load generation and real-time performance insights

The most valuable features I have found in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are that everything is online and centralized, so I do not need to go anywhere to check the configuration and everything. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well. The cloud-based load generators in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) have benefited my testing setup because we can generate the load across the globe, which was previously a little bit difficult on the on-premises version. The user interface in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is intuitive and this will be easy to communicate and collaborate amongst the team also because sharing the online URL with the team, they can simply check the analysis and everything.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Open-source and flexible but needs client-side scripting

It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS. Also, the APIs tested with SoapUI can be directly used, avoiding the need to create collections like in Postman. The client-side scripting, if incorporated, would provide a complete solution for performance tests. It can handle user distribution and transaction throughput distribution effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud eliminates the need for our own testing infrastructure when running tests."

"This software solution has allowed us to run larger, high concurrency performance testing cycles in a very repetitive manner…a requirement for validating our application solutions and supporting infrastructure for customer facing web apps."

"Before LoadRunner, we weren't even testing performance and now we're performance testing."

"We can determine response times for our external applications, from most places around the world, for a small fee."

"The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way."

"It's fast, easy to use, has a user-friendly UI, and you can split users."

"Customer Service is immaculate."

"The solution has been quite good and integrates well with other products."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

"he initial deployment process is easy."

"Eventually, we enhanced the whole automation, and how it should get integrated with the hardware, or another tool like Jenkins for CI/CD automation."

"It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS."

"ReadyAPI automation can help us validate the functionality of most web services, allowing us to find out the exact number of defects before deployment to the user interface."

"It has helped improve productivity and functionality."

"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."

"We can scale."

"It's like a centralized interface that allows us to increase the quality of our APIs."

Cons

"There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other."

"One area of improvement in the software's support is the replaying of captured data within the development environment. It would be beneficial if the replay feature could accurately mimic what the actual application is doing for better analysis and testing."

"It needs the ability to execute other protocols, especially the TruClient for Firefox without having to convert them."

"The documentation could absolutely be improved and scripts."

"I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check."

"This vendor, Micro Focus, is not very good at technical support."

"The analysis feature in OpenText LoadRunner Cloud requires improvement. In-depth analysis tools found in the standalone LoadRunner analysis, such as graph merging and setting granularity, would be beneficial."

"I think the product is still immature because we have some problem reaching the mobile center connection related to a proper configuration on our machine."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

"This solution could be improved by offering artificial AI testing in addition to API testing. For example, we would like to have machine learning testing because when test applications, manual work could be completed automatically using this functionality."

"I want the solution to be able to monitor Apache Kafka activity as well."

"It is very slow sometimes. If they could improve its performance, it would be really great for the users."

"We need some time to understand and configure the solution."

"The solution’s interface could be improved."

"The client-side scripting mostly isn't needed for performance testing, however, if implemented, it would enhance the tool."

"It is very slow sometimes."

"I'd not sure if they have the same level of documentation for performance and security testing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

"We find the cost to be affordable."

"This solution operates on a licence basis and the usage and cost varies according to the use case. It is more expensive if you include access to the learning center. On average it costs approximately 800 Euros."

"ReadyAPI Performance’s pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows it is very high and very costly.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) can be improved by incorporating code improvements. I would add that it reduces the initial setup complexity, improves the learning curve op...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ReadyAPI Performance?

Load UI is mostly free, and the pricing for the pro version is very affordable compared to other tools like LoadRunner.

What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Performance?

The client-side scripting mostly isn't needed for performance testing, however, if implemented, it would enhance the tool.

What is your primary use case for ReadyAPI Performance?

The primary use case is to conduct server-side performance tests, scalability tests, and endurance tests using SoapUI and Load UI.

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 16% of the time

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 13% of the time

k6 Open Source vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 6% of the time

Product Reports

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

ReadyAPI Performance

Download ReadyAPI Performance product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

LoadUI NG Pro

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

ReadyAPI Performance is known for its powerful load, spike, and operational volume testing, supported by robust reporting and security features. It ensures easy deployment and seamless integration with platforms like Azure and AWS.

ReadyAPI Performance stands out due to its ability to handle comprehensive performance tests and measure transactions per second effectively. Its client-side scripting, coupled with impressive scalability and stability, aids in efficient defect identification and functionality validation. The tool is appreciated for supporting multiple assertions and generating detailed reports. Although users suggest enhancements like improved speed and better Apache Kafka activity monitoring, ReadyAPI Performance continues to be a trusted option for teams conducting server-side tests and evaluating web services.

What are the key features of ReadyAPI Performance?

Load and Spike Testing: Effective for evaluating site response under variable traffic conditions.
Extensive Reporting: Generates detailed performance analysis and user distribution reports.
Integration Capabilities: Bridges seamlessly with Azure, AWS, and multiple frameworks.
Client-side Scripting: Offers customization and automation for complex scenarios.
Multiple Assertions: Supports various types of assertions for thorough validation.

What are the advantages of using ReadyAPI Performance?

Scalability: Reliable under heavy loads, perfect for growing business demands.
Stability: Provides a stable environment for consistent testing outcomes.
Efficient Defect Identification: Automation boosts early bug detection.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers comprehensive features despite higher upfront costs.

Development and QA teams across industries leverage ReadyAPI Performance for fine-tuning API responses, integrating backend codes, and ensuring optimal performance in FinTech and banking services. By configuring automation for scalability and endurance tests, they validate transaction efficacy and backend integrations, especially with open banking services.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. ReadyAPI Performance