OpenText Diagnostics vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

OpenText and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #61, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

OpenText Diagnostics

Read 4 OpenText Diagnostics reviews

549 Views
538 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 253 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

12,143 Views
9,472 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Diagnostics

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 17, 2025

OpenText Diagnostics and Splunk AppDynamics operate in the diagnostics and monitoring domain. OpenText Diagnostics is favored for its cost-effectiveness and support, while Splunk AppDynamics has an edge with advanced features and extensive services, justifying its higher price.

Features:OpenText Diagnostics includes data analytics tools, customizable dashboards, and efficient monitoring of application diagnostics. Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive application performance management, detailed reporting, and in-depth analysis capabilities. Its advanced features make it well-suited for businesses needing extensive diagnostics.

Room for Improvement:OpenText Diagnostics could improve its advanced monitoring capabilities. More intuitive dashboards and enhanced reporting would offer better insights. Splunk AppDynamics could simplify deployment and reduce the complexity of its extensive feature set. Offering tiered pricing might attract more cost-sensitive users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText Diagnostics allows for quick deployment and is supported by a strong customer service framework. Splunk AppDynamics, in contrast, requires more effort for deployment due to its comprehensive offerings, but compensates with excellent customer service and in-depth instructions to ease the process.

Pricing and ROI:OpenText Diagnostics is well-regarded for its competitive pricing, appealing to businesses that seek a high return on investment without a significant upfront cost. Splunk AppDynamics demands higher initial expenses but delivers superior returns through its robust analysis and feature-rich platform, ideal for organizations pursuing deep insights.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Diagnostics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

61st

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

253

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Diagnostics is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 4.1%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk AppDynamics	4.1%
OpenText Diagnostics	0.3%
Other	95.6%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ravi Suvvari

Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees

Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training

HP Diagnostics is a very good monitoring tool especially for transaction level monitoring -- it shows hot spots which can be drilled down to DB level, table, query, SP's, record and field level and also at Object level, Classes level,method or Augment levels instead of pinpointing bottlenecks at layer level it goes deep inside for information. It has very good tracing capabilities despite being an agent based tool compared to other agent less monitoring tools. Overall a very good tool for monitoring application diagnostics for quick and easy resolution with help of thread information. Drills down from slow, end-user transactions to the bottle necked component, method, or SQL statement, helping to solve memory, exception, and other common problems Key features and benefits • Automatically detects all components touched by a business process and traces them with no user intervention • Provides complete application visibility across the application lifecycle, enabling higher application quality when applications go live • Reduces mean time to resolution (MTTR) in your J2EE, .NET, ERP, or CRM (SAP, Oracle®, PeopleSoft) environment • Integrates fully with HP Business Availability Center software, HP LoadRunner, and HP Performance Center.

Read full review

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Application performance management and error resolution improved with data-driven insights

Dynatrace has multiple functions compared to Splunk AppDynamics, so Splunk AppDynamics should add those functions, which are not available as of now. Dynatrace has a universal agent that collects all information related to their CI, and if one CI has multiple languages, then there is no need to instrument multiple agents. However, Splunk AppDynamics requires multiple agents; if I have one server with multiple applications in different languages, then I need to instrument different agents for each application. Splunk AppDynamics should work with Dynatrace with one single universal agent that works with all application languages, eliminating the need for multiple implementations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."

"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out."

"The solution is great for database monitoring. You don't have to install an agent on the database. You just install the server to a database agent. It's a good product for some database administration if you don't want to install an agent on the database for security."

"The feature we find most valuable, is that the solution creates a unified platform making it really easy to pinpoint a problem, and then drill down into a transaction to resolve the issue."

"Once you get past installation, AppDynamics is highly stable and we get good results."

"It has improved my organization because we are able to proactively and reactively look at performance issues."

"The most valuable feature is the end-user monitoring."

"The alert mechanism in AppDynamics enhances server management tasks by using agents installed on each server."

"Capacity planning is, in my opinion, the most useful."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ability to discover and track transactions."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"The interface could be more user friendly."

"The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."

"The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI."

"The solution could be more mobile friendly."

"An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side."

"Installation and configuration can be very tough. An average user without specialized knowledge can't do this. You need to have DevOps and QA teams handle it. During installation, a lot of customers get stuck trying to track the database or the API part, and they have to contact customer support."

"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."

"The limitations are often due to the vendors not supplying all the profiling features to AppDynamics."

"The solution has performance issues after we deploy the agent."

"It is stable, but the only downside is the licensing part."

"AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring needs to offer an end-to-end experience, including the internet layer and third-party elements that come into play on websites."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"My understanding is that the price of this solution is quite high, compared to other products."

"There is an annual cost for the use of this solution."

"Yearly payments have to be made toward the licensing costs of the solution. The solution has no additional costs apart from the licensing costs."

"The pricing is very competitive."

"The price of AppDynamics could be reduced in my region."

"The pricing model for AppDynamics could be better. You have to subscribe to a yearly or a three-year licensing, which isn't very handy. The solution is one of the most expensive in the market today."

"This price of this product is expensive."

"AppDynamics does not usually do monthly payments. They do it on an annual basis, at the very least."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	188

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit

Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppDynamics?

The solution saves time and cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 32% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 20% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 14% of the time

Omnipliance vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 14% of the time

More OpenText Diagnostics Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 14% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2025

Download OpenText Diagnostics product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

September 2025

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics

No data available

Overview

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.

OpenText

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?

Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.

How does AppDynamics benefit users?

Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk

Sample Customers

BSkyB, Alior Bank

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.