OpenText Functional Testing and Qualibrate are competing in the software testing market. OpenText Functional Testing offers a broad feature set that appeals to large-scale operations, but Qualibrate's user-friendly interface and innovative features provide an edge for agile environments.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing is known for comprehensive testing capabilities with advanced automation tools, seamless integration, and robust enterprise-level attributes. Qualibrate simplifies the process with a cloud-based platform, integrating process documentation, test automation, and learning into a single solution.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance user interface simplicity and reduce complexity for smaller teams. Its steep learning curve and higher initial investment could also be improved. Qualibrate could expand its feature set for enterprise-level needs and improve integration with other systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing provides a traditional deployment model, suited for heavy enterprise support with a longer setup time. Qualibrate offers a quick deployment with its cloud-based solution, favoring fast onboarding and flexibility, making it ideal for dynamic, agile projects.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing involves greater setup costs, justifying this with its extensive functionalities for large operations. Qualibrate offers a more cost-effective approach with a lower initial investment, delivering a higher ROI through efficiency and less complexity.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.5% |
| Qualibrate | 0.4% |
| Other | 91.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
