OpenText Functional Testing vs Testim comparison

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 10 Testim reviews

3,550 Views
2,130 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing and Testim compete in automated testing solutions. Testim has the upper hand due to its AI-driven capabilities, offering greater versatility and innovation.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing delivers flexibility for enterprise-level testing, advanced automation, and integration with tools like Oracle and SAP. Testim specializes in AI-driven technology, smart locators, and seamless integration with agile environments, highlighted for efficiency and innovation.

Room for Improvement: OpenText can enhance AI integration, reduce setup complexity, and improve adaptability to new tech. Testim could improve its documentation, broaden support for legacy systems, and offer more detailed reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides stable deployment with customization options and extensive documentation. Testim offers straightforward deployment ideal for agile teams, backed by responsive customer support ensuring quick resolutions.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves higher setup costs with a gradual ROI, ideal for extensive customization. Testim provides an accessible pricing model with a quicker ROI, emphasizing cost-effectiveness for agile teams.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing vs. Testim Report (Updated: April 2026).

OpenText Functional Testing vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing is 6.8%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.3%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing	6.8%
Testim	2.3%
Other	90.9%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Kevin Copple

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Has supported faster test execution and increased flexibility while offering room to improve support responsiveness

Reducing the levels of support is something they could continue to improve. They tend to have an entry-level person that may not be as familiar with the product that fields the calls, which creates another day of delay to get to the level that's needed. This is a common practice across most companies where you call, you get the entry-level person, and then they work their way up to help screen calls so that they are more focused.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Micro Focus UFT One gives us integration capabilities with both API and GUI components. I like the user interface. It doesn't require that much skill to use and has automatic settings, which is useful for users who don't know what to select. It also has dark and light themes."

"The most valuable features are the API testing, the integration with DevOps and accessibility to people without a lot of technical skill."

"The UFT tool can be such a huge boon to a testing organization that can commit to its use."

"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."

"For test automation, it helps to speed up the testing and to speed up the software delivery, especially for HPE UFT because you have lots of test automation tools."

"At our company, we have everything from mainframe to modern web UI, and UFT allows us to test all of those sites."

"I like the direction the solution is heading and am really happy with how they keep adding new features."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

"The stability has been great; we can add stable tests very easily and improve our automation coverage, which allows us to deploy a new version into production every few days with minimum manual labor."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"We primarily use the solution for business E2E testing, as it is fast and reliable, easy to maintain, and allows for the involvement of QA as well as Dev and BA."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The Testim technical support is very responsive and worked with a specific team member on the First Databank side to answer hard technical questions and took enhancement requests as needed."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"It enabled us to cover our app in end-to-end tests very quickly with quality results."

More Testim pros

Cons

"When I ran the script for two or three times sequentially, the tool hung and wouldn’t respond."

"It needs to be able to be used on Chrome, Firefox, and other browsers on Macs and not just Safari. That's a very key requirement for my organization."

"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."

"There is a gap in technical support which is also part of our review. We've raised issues in the past, which have not been fixed in two years."

"Object identification has room for improvement, to make it more efficient."

"We used to run it as a test suite. OpenText provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available."

"They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."

"The problem with the solution is that you need to have highly specialized skills in order to make the scripts."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind, for instance - instead of going in and out of the editor every time I want to view test data for a test, I could just view the test data in the table, or the ability to copy steps through tests."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"The tool's price is high."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"The solution is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	71

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT One?

I'm more familiar with Functional Testing. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is a different product set that functions as an IDE for writing custom code. We don't leverage that product bec...

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

What is your primary use case for Testim?

As a Quality Engineering leader, I'm responsible for testing our 20-25 applications. Manual testing is becoming increasingly challenging due to their growing scope and complexity. We've been automa...

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 4% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 9% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText

Testim offers a comprehensive automation testing toolkit with features like smart locators and AI functionality. It supports developers and QA teams in managing testing across environments efficiently, even with UI changes.

Testim is designed for automation testing with robust features such as record and playback capabilities, a smart locator system, and a reliable algorithm to maintain stability during UI modifications. Its pre-defined tests, customizable JS testing, and accessibility features improve usability. Organizations benefit from its REST API, CLI, and shared steps, alongside AI advancements that simplify test storage and accelerate delivery times. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements in pricing, visual testing, and element selection tools, with calls for enhanced mobile app support and better report features. Multiple test runs may cause stability issues, leaving room for enhanced API integrations and more detailed documentation.

What are Testim's most important features?

Record and Playback: Simplifies test creation with easy-to-use recording tools
Smart Locator: Maintains test accuracy despite UI changes
Accessible Pre-defined Tests: Offers templates for quicker setup
AI Functionality: Enhances test case management and delivery
REST API and CLI: Facilitates integration into development workflows

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Speeds up testing processes and script automation
Usability: Intuitive interface supports both technical and non-technical users
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse web platforms and applications
Collaboration: Enhances teamwork by sharing steps across projects

Industries primarily employ Testim for automating business end-to-end tests, integrating it within complicated applications. It serves both developers and QA teams by supporting web app testing, API calls, accessibility checks, and JavaScript-focused test data. This low-code platform suits team members with varying technical expertise, adding efficiency to QA and development processes.

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

OpenText Functional Testing vs. Testim