OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs StresStimulus comparison

OpenText and Stimulus Technology are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1, while Stimulus Technology is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 8.8% mindshare in PTT, compared to Stimulus Technology’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Stimulus Technology users who would recommend it.

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Read 44 OpenText LoadRunner Cloud reviews

2,809 Views
1,625 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

StresStimulus

Read 3 StresStimulus reviews

441 Views
163 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

StresStimulus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and StresStimulus are performance testing products. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud stands out for scalability and comprehensive support, whereas StresStimulus is noted for affordability and user-friendliness, offering significant value through unique testing capabilities and flexibility.

Features:OpenText LoadRunner Cloud includes extensive integration capabilities with various platforms, detailed performance analysis, and access to cloud-based resources. StresStimulus provides robust test creation and execution, user-friendly scripting, and the ability to test complex web applications efficiently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers a straightforward SaaS deployment with helpful onboarding and comprehensive support options. StresStimulus delivers ease of deployment with a simpler setup process, focusing on quick start and efficient test execution. Customer service for StresStimulus is recognized for its responsiveness. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is praised for its detailed documentation and proactive service, while StresStimulus gains preference for practical assistance and ease of configuration.

Pricing and ROI:OpenText LoadRunner Cloud has a higher setup cost, justified by its advanced features and scalability. StresStimulus presents a more budget-friendly option, showing a quicker return on investment through its affordable pricing and efficient resource utilization.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. StresStimulus Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. StresStimulus

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

StresStimulus

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is 8.8%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StresStimulus is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Cloud-based testing accommodates high user scenarios while anticipating location improvement

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines. This scalability and network bandwidth capability are essential for high-scale load testing. Additionally, it allows me to upload common LoadRunner scripts to the cloud for testing without requiring a license for scripting tools, offering a flexible and comfortable high-scale load testing solution.

Read full review

Shiju Chandran

Manager - Performance & Site Reliability at AssureCare LLC

Good performance testing, simple UI, and the ability to run the same script across different domains

StresStimulus simulates browser HTTP calls. I would love to see where it can also simulate a real browser to measure visually complete time. For example, to be something similar to TruClient. We run tests on SQL statements and stored procedures directly, even before integrating with UI. I wish there were a way to connect to my application DB and run SQL queries using a JDBC connection. In a world where the applications are changing every day, I hope StresStimulus comes up with an option to compare HTTP requests before and after deployment and tell me what requests have changed. This would help avoid rescripting every time, and this would be a huge deal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover."

"It's a fast product, so you don't have much trouble in terms of maintenance overhead. You don't want to just look into configuring load generators, look for upgrades, and end up having that take up a lot of your time. With this solution, you just log in and you start using it. This means that there is a huge benefit in terms of the overhead of maintaining the infrastructure and the maintenance effort."

"A vital feature of the solution is its ability to compose realistic scenarios for performance testing"

"One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols."

"The TCO has been optimized along with the total ROI."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to configure browser settings for different operating systems and on different versions without the need to install every single version on each machine and to manage them."

"I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud a ten out of ten for scalability."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the Vuser license; it allows us to reduce the cost as per requirement."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pros

"Technical support is great."

"Designed to be a modern testing tool, StresStimulus made it easy for us to upgrade from an older deprecated testing tool and adapt to Agile DevOps testing principles by shifting left with performance testing."

"Compared to other tools, there is not a whole lot to Stress Stimulus UI. This makes it easy to use, be it while scripting, executing, or having to train someone new to the team."

Cons

"Improvements to the reporting would be good."

"We encounter hurdles while running the professional version for on-premise setup."

"We did have some challenges with the initial implementation."

"We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD."

"One area for improvement in LoadRunner Cloud, especially for agile models, is its limited support for functional testing alongside its robust non-functional testing capabilities."

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"Sometimes, you are utilizing one of the low generators, then all of a sudden if you discontinue from one project, it actually deletes the entire low generator."

"There is a steep learning curve for the product, too."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud cons

"Result analysis (snap-out tabs for side-by-side comparisons) need improvement."

"We run tests on SQL statements and stored procedures directly, even before integrating with UI. I wish there were a way to connect to my application DB and run SQL queries using a JDBC connection."

"StresStimulus has a dedicated blog where users of the tool can log new feature requests or enhancements to existing features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I would prefer it to be cheaper. On a scale of one to ten, the price is a five. It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter ( /products/apache-jmeter-reviews ), which is free.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 28% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Competitors

Apache JMeter vs StresStimulus

Compared 67% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs StresStimulus

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs StresStimulus

Compared 17% of the time

More StresStimulus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

May 2025

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

StresStimulus

April 2025

Download StresStimulus product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

No data available

Overview

Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.

OpenText

StresStimulus is a load testing tool for websites, mobile and Enterprise apps. It determines the web performance and scalability of your application under the rigors of heavy traffic load. Hundreds or thousands of physical users are realistically emulated through on-premise load generators or in a cloud testing environment

Stimulus Technology

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. StresStimulus

May 2025

Free Report: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. StresStimulus

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. StresStimulus and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. StresStimulus report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.